Literature DB >> 24992481

Differences in soil solution chemistry between soils amended with nanosized CuO or Cu reference materials: implications for nanotoxicity tests.

Heather V A McShane1, Geoffrey I Sunahara, Joann K Whalen, William H Hendershot.   

Abstract

Soil toxicity tests for metal oxide nanoparticles often include micrometer-sized oxide and metal salt treatments to distinguish between toxicity from nanometer-sized particles, non-nanometer-sized particles, and dissolved ions. Test result will be confounded if each chemical form has different effects on soil solution chemistry. We report on changes in soil solution chemistry over 56 days-the duration of some standard soil toxicity tests-in three soils amended with 500 mg/kg Cu as nanometer-sized CuO (nano), micrometer-sized CuO (micrometer), or Cu(NO3)2 (salt). In the CuO-amended soils, the log Cu2+ activity was initially low (minimum -9.48) and increased with time (maximum -5.20), whereas in the salt-amended soils it was initially high (maximum -4.80) and decreased with time (minimum -6.10). The Cu2+ activity in the nano-amended soils was higher than in the micrometer-amended soils for at least the first 11 days, and lower than in the salt-amended soils for at least 28 d. The pH, and dissolved Ca and Mg concentrations in the CuO-amended soils were similar, but the salt-amended soils had lower pH for at least 14 d, and higher Ca and Mg concentrations throughout the test. Soil pretreatments such as leaching and aging prior to toxicity tests are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24992481     DOI: 10.1021/es500141h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  3 in total

1.  Considerations of Environmentally Relevant Test Conditions for Improved Evaluation of Ecological Hazards of Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Patricia A Holden; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey; Fred Klaessig; Ronald F Turco; Monika Mortimer; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; David Avery; Damià Barceló; Renata Behra; Yoram Cohen; Laurence Deydier-Stephan; P Lee Ferguson; Teresa F Fernandes; Barbara Herr Harthorn; W Matthew Henderson; Robert A Hoke; Danail Hristozov; John M Johnston; Agnes B Kane; Larry Kapustka; Arturo A Keller; Hunter S Lenihan; Wess Lovell; Catherine J Murphy; Roger M Nisbet; Elijah J Petersen; Edward R Salinas; Martin Scheringer; Monita Sharma; David E Speed; Yasir Sultan; Paul Westerhoff; Jason C White; Mark R Wiesner; Eva M Wong; Baoshan Xing; Meghan Steele Horan; Hilary A Godwin; André E Nel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Towards sensible toxicity testing for nanomaterials: proposal for the specification of test design.

Authors:  Annegret Potthoff; Mirco Weil; Tobias Meißner; Dana Kühnel
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 8.090

Review 3.  Antibacterial properties and toxicity from metallic nanomaterials.

Authors:  Gina V Vimbela; Sang M Ngo; Carolyn Fraze; Lei Yang; David A Stout
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-05-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.