Literature DB >> 24991345

The opportunity for health plans to improve quality and reduce costs by embracing primary care medical homes.

Sarah Collins1, Kevin B Kip Piper2, Gary Owens3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The large and growing costs of healthcare will continue to burden all payers in the nation's healthcare system-not only the states that are struggling to meet Medicaid costs and the federal government, but also the private health plans that serve commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid beneficiaries. Cost will increasingly become a concern as millions more people become newly insured as a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). Primary care delivery through patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) and other coordinated-care models have improved care and reduced costs. Health plans have a strategic opportunity to promote better care at a lower cost by embracing medical homes and encouraging their growth. Health plans can play an important role in transforming the US healthcare system, as well as better position themselves for long-term corporate success.
OBJECTIVES: To discuss several examples of organizations that serve a variety of beneficiaries and have been successful in promoting medical homes and coordinated primary care, and to suggest steps that health plans can take to improve the quality of care and reduce costs. DISCUSSION: The models discussed in this article take a number of different approaches to create incentives for high-quality, cost-effective, coordinated primary care. Several health plans and groups use enhanced fee-for-service or per-member per-month payment models for primary care physician (PCP) practices that reach a specified level of medical home or electronic health record certification. Most of the examples addressed in this article also include an additional payment to encourage care management and coordination. The results showed a significant decline in costs and in the use of expensive medical services. One Medicaid coordinated-care program we reviewed saved almost $1 billion in reduced spending over 4 years, and achieves savings of approximately 15% within 6 months of the beneficiaries' enrollment into their program. Another PCMH payer program led to an approximate 28% reduction in acute care hospital admissions among Medicare beneficiaries and an approximate 38% reduction in admissions among commercial beneficiaries.
CONCLUSION: Based on the review of real-world examples, we recommend 6 steps that health plans can use to take advantage of the opportunity to embrace medical homes as a means to improve healthcare quality and to reduce costs. These recommendations include getting feedback from PCPs to improve plan provider networks, creating value-based primary care reimbursement systems, encouraging biannual visits with high-risk patients, funding case managers for high-risk patients, considering Medicaid coordinated-care models, and promoting ACA policies that support primary care.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24991345      PMCID: PMC4031704     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits        ISSN: 1942-2962


  7 in total

1.  How Geisinger's advanced medical home model argues the case for rapid-cycle innovation.

Authors:  Glenn D Steele; Jean A Haynes; Duane E Davis; Janet Tomcavage; Walter F Stewart; Tom R Graf; Ronald A Paulus; Karena Weikel; Janet Shikles
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Projecting US primary care physician workforce needs: 2010-2025.

Authors:  Stephen M Petterson; Winston R Liaw; Robert L Phillips; David L Rabin; David S Meyers; Andrew W Bazemore
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  The Group Health medical home at year two: cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for providers.

Authors:  Robert J Reid; Katie Coleman; Eric A Johnson; Paul A Fishman; Clarissa Hsu; Michael P Soman; Claire E Trescott; Michael Erikson; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  A nationwide survey of patient centered medical home demonstration projects.

Authors:  Asaf Bitton; Carina Martin; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Value and the medical home: effects of transformed primary care.

Authors:  Richard J Gilfillan; Janet Tomcavage; Meredith B Rosenthal; Duane E Davis; Jove Graham; Jason A Roy; Steven B Pierdon; Frederick J Bloom; Thomas R Graf; Roy Goldman; Karena M Weikel; Bruce H Hamory; Ronald A Paulus; Glen D Steele
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 6.  Primary care shortages: strengthening this sector is urgently needed, now and in preparation for healthcare reform.

Authors:  Sarah Collins
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2012-01

7.  The effect of technology-supported, multidisease care management on the mortality and hospitalization of seniors.

Authors:  David A Dorr; Adam B Wilcox; Cherie P Brunker; Rachel E Burdon; Steven M Donnelly
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.562

  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Status Update on Translation of Integrated Primary Dental-Medical Care Delivery for Management of Diabetic Patients.

Authors:  Ingrid Glurich; Gregory Nycz; Amit Acharya
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2017-04-03

2.  Interactional Resources for Quality Improvement: Learning From Participants Through a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Joanna Veazey Brooks; Ksenia Gorbenko; Charles Bosk
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2017 Apr/Jun       Impact factor: 0.926

3.  Association between primary care appointment lengths and subsequent ambulatory reassessment, emergency department care, and hospitalization: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kristi M Swanson; John C Matulis; Rozalina G McCoy
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-03-06

4.  Primary Care Use Among Commercially Insured Adolescents: Evidence From the 2018 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set.

Authors:  Andrew J Leidner; Zhaoli Tang; Yuping Tsai
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.043

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.