BACKGROUND: Advances in therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly biologics, have transformed the treatment paradigm for RA. However, the associated costs of these therapies result in a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. As a chronic disease requiring lifelong treatment, most health plans now position RA drugs as a high-priority therapeutic category. OBJECTIVE: To identify provider and payer practices and perceptions regarding coverage of RA biologics in the current marketplace, as well as emerging trends in reimbursement practices. METHOD: In November 2011, Reimbursement Intelligence, a healthcare research company, collected and analyzed quantitative and qualitative data via parallel-structure online surveys of 100 rheumatologists and 50 health plan payers (medical and pharmacy directors) who represent more than 80 million covered lives. The surveys included approximately 150 questions, and the surveys were designed to force a response for each question. RESULTS: Payers reported using tier placement, prior authorization, and contracting in determining coverage strategies for RA biologics. Among providers, experience with older RA agents remains the key driver for the choice of a biologic agent. A majority of payers and providers (68% and 54%, respectively) reported that they did not anticipate a change in the way their plans would manage biologics over the next 2 to 4 years. Payers' responses indicated uncertainty about how therapeutic positioning of newer, small-molecule drugs at price parity to biologics would affect the current reimbursement landscape. Survey responses show that approval of an indication for early treatment of RA is not likely to change the prescribing and reimbursement landscape for RA biologics. This survey further shows that payers and providers are generally aligned in terms of perceptions of current and future treatments for RA. CONCLUSION: Advances in RA therapies allow patients increasing options for effective disease management. However, the high cost of biologic therapies and the need for lifelong treatment raise economic concerns. Payer satisfaction with current therapies and uncertainty about added value of new therapies will create challenges for new medications coming to market.
BACKGROUND: Advances in therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly biologics, have transformed the treatment paradigm for RA. However, the associated costs of these therapies result in a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. As a chronic disease requiring lifelong treatment, most health plans now position RA drugs as a high-priority therapeutic category. OBJECTIVE: To identify provider and payer practices and perceptions regarding coverage of RA biologics in the current marketplace, as well as emerging trends in reimbursement practices. METHOD: In November 2011, Reimbursement Intelligence, a healthcare research company, collected and analyzed quantitative and qualitative data via parallel-structure online surveys of 100 rheumatologists and 50 health plan payers (medical and pharmacy directors) who represent more than 80 million covered lives. The surveys included approximately 150 questions, and the surveys were designed to force a response for each question. RESULTS: Payers reported using tier placement, prior authorization, and contracting in determining coverage strategies for RA biologics. Among providers, experience with older RA agents remains the key driver for the choice of a biologic agent. A majority of payers and providers (68% and 54%, respectively) reported that they did not anticipate a change in the way their plans would manage biologics over the next 2 to 4 years. Payers' responses indicated uncertainty about how therapeutic positioning of newer, small-molecule drugs at price parity to biologics would affect the current reimbursement landscape. Survey responses show that approval of an indication for early treatment of RA is not likely to change the prescribing and reimbursement landscape for RA biologics. This survey further shows that payers and providers are generally aligned in terms of perceptions of current and future treatments for RA. CONCLUSION: Advances in RA therapies allow patients increasing options for effective disease management. However, the high cost of biologic therapies and the need for lifelong treatment raise economic concerns. Payer satisfaction with current therapies and uncertainty about added value of new therapies will create challenges for new medications coming to market.
Authors: Daniel Aletaha; Tuhina Neogi; Alan J Silman; Julia Funovits; David T Felson; Clifton O Bingham; Neal S Birnbaum; Gerd R Burmester; Vivian P Bykerk; Marc D Cohen; Bernard Combe; Karen H Costenbader; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Johanna M W Hazes; Kathryn Hobbs; Tom W J Huizinga; Arthur Kavanaugh; Jonathan Kay; Tore K Kvien; Timothy Laing; Philip Mease; Henri A Ménard; Larry W Moreland; Raymond L Naden; Theodore Pincus; Josef S Smolen; Ewa Stanislawska-Biernat; Deborah Symmons; Paul P Tak; Katherine S Upchurch; Jirí Vencovsky; Frederick Wolfe; Gillian Hawker Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Kenneth G Saag; Gim Gee Teng; Nivedita M Patkar; Jeremy Anuntiyo; Catherine Finney; Jeffrey R Curtis; Harold E Paulus; Amy Mudano; Maria Pisu; Mary Elkins-Melton; Ryan Outman; Jeroan J Allison; Maria Suarez Almazor; S Louis Bridges; W Winn Chatham; Marc Hochberg; Catherine MacLean; Ted Mikuls; Larry W Moreland; James O'Dell; Anthony M Turkiewicz; Daniel E Furst Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-06-15
Authors: David M Kern; Lawrence Chang; Kalyani Sonawane; Cynthia J Larmore; Natalie N Boytsov; Ralph A Quimbo; Joseph Singer; John T Hinton; Sze-Jung Wu; Andre B Araujo Journal: Rheumatol Ther Date: 2018-05-30
Authors: Peter C Taylor; Rieke Alten; Juan J Gomez Reino; Roberto Caporali; Philippe Bertin; Emma Sullivan; Robert Wood; James Piercy; Radu Vasilescu; Dean Spurden; Jose Alvir; Miriam Tarallo Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Vance J Bray; Aaron Broadwell; Herbert S B Baraf; Shawn Black; Brenna L Brady; Joseph Tkacz; Lorraine Yarngo; Raphael J DeHoratius Journal: Drugs R D Date: 2018-09
Authors: Hong J Kan; Kirill Dyagilev; Peter Schulam; Suchi Saria; Hadi Kharrazi; David Bodycombe; Charles T Molta; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 5.156