Literature DB >> 24991062

ACASI Gender-of-Interviewer Voice Effects on Reports to Questions about Sensitive 
Behaviors Among Young Adults.

Jennifer Dykema, Kerryann Diloreto, Jessica L Price, Eric White, Nora Cate Schaeffer.   

Abstract

Although previous research indicates that audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) yields higher reports of threatening behaviors than interviewer-administered interviews, very few studies have examined the potential effect of the gender of the ACASI voice on survey reports. Because the voice in ACASI necessarily has a gender, it is important to understand whether using a voice that is perceived as male or female might further enhance the validity associated with ACASI. This study examines gender-of-voice effects for a set of questions about sensitive behaviors administered via ACASI to a sample of young adults at high risk for engaging in the behaviors. Results showed higher levels of engagement in the behaviors and more consistent reporting among males when responding to a female voice, indicating that males were potentially more accurate when reporting to the female voice. Reports by females were not influenced by the voice's gender. Our analysis adds to research on gender-of-voice effects in surveys, with important findings on measuring sensitive behaviors among young adults.

Year:  2012        PMID: 24991062      PMCID: PMC4079084          DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfs021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Opin Q        ISSN: 0033-362X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Interviewer effects in public health surveys.

Authors:  R E Davis; M P Couper; N K Janz; C H Caldwell; K Resnicow
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-09-17

2.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology.

Authors:  C F Turner; L Ku; S M Rogers; L D Lindberg; J H Pleck; F L Sonenstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Prevention with gay and bisexual men living with HIV: rationale and methods of the Seropositive Urban Men's Intervention Trial (SUMIT).

Authors:  Richard J Wolitski; Jeffrey T Parsons; Cynthia A Gómez; David W Purcell; Colleen C Hoff; Perry N Halkitis
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.177

4.  Interviewer effects on self-reported substance use among homeless persons.

Authors:  T P Johnson; J A Parsons
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 5.  The reporting of sensitive behavior by adolescents: a methodological experiment in Kenya.

Authors:  Barbara S Mensch; Paul C Hewett; Annabel S Erulkar
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2003-05

6.  Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Dindia; M Allen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  The effects of interviewer gender in mental health interviews.

Authors:  M Pollner
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.254

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Actor-Partner Interdependence Model Analysis of Sexual Communication and Relationship/Family Planning Factors Among Immigrant Latino Couples in the United States.

Authors:  Yui Matsuda
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-07-01

2.  Gambian cultural beliefs, attitudes and discourse on reproductive health and mortality: Implications for data collection in surveys from the interviewer's perspective.

Authors:  A J Rerimoi; J Niemann; I Lange; I M Timæus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Measuring Support for Women's Political Leadership: Gender of Interviewer Effects Among African Survey Respondents.

Authors:  Aksel Sundström; Daniel Stockemer
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2022-09-02

4.  Language analysis of spontaneous descriptions of restless legs syndrome: Gender differences?

Authors:  Evi Holzknecht; Frank Domahs; Elisabeth Brandauer; Melanie Bergmann; Tugba Zengin; Margarete Delazer; Margarethe Hochleitner; Birgit Högl; Ambra Stefani
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 5.296

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.