Literature DB >> 24991022

European breast cancer service screening outcomes: a first balance sheet of the benefits and harms.

Eugenio Paci1, Mireille Broeders2, Solveig Hofvind3, Donella Puliti4, Stephen William Duffy5.   

Abstract

A recent comprehensive review has been carried out to quantify the benefits and harms of the European population-based mammographic screening programs. Five literature reviews were conducted on the basis of the observational published studies evaluating breast cancer mortality reduction, breast cancer overdiagnosis, and false-positive results. On the basis of the studies reviewed, the authors present a first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet. For every 1,000 women screened biennially from ages 50 to 51 years until ages 68 to 69 years and followed up until age 79 years, an estimated seven to nine breast cancer deaths are avoided, four cases are overdiagnosed, 170 women have at least one recall followed by noninvasive assessment with a negative result, and 30 women have at least one recall followed by invasive procedures yielding a negative result. The chance of a breast cancer death being avoided by population-based mammography screening of appropriate quality is more than that of overdiagnosis by screening. These outcomes should be communicated to women offered service screening in Europe. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24991022     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  34 in total

1.  Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Natasha K Stout; Clyde B Schechter; Jeroen J van den Broek; Diana L Miglioretti; Martin Krapcho; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Diego Munoz; Sandra J Lee; Donald A Berry; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Oguzhan Alagoz; Karla Kerlikowske; Anna N A Tosteson; Aimee M Near; Amanda Hoeffken; Yaojen Chang; Eveline A Heijnsdijk; Gary Chisholm; Xuelin Huang; Hui Huang; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Ronald Gangnon; Brian L Sprague; Sylvia Plevritis; Eric Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Impact of the Introduction of Digital Mammography in an Organized Screening Program on the Recall and Detection Rate.

Authors:  Cinzia Campari; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Carlo Alberto Mori; Sara Ravaioli; Andrea Nitrosi; Rita Vacondio; Pamela Mancuso; Antonella Cattani; Pierpaolo Pattacini
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Breast Cancer Disparities at Home and Abroad: A Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for System-Level Change.

Authors:  Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  New targeted therapies for breast cancer: A focus on tumor microenvironmental signals and chemoresistant breast cancers.

Authors:  Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje; Paul Faustin Seke Etet; Lorella Vecchio; Richard Simo Tagne; Jeremie Mbo Amvene; Jean-Marc Muller; Mauro Krampera; Kiven Erique Lukong
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Double versus single reading of mammograms in a breast cancer screening programme: a cost-consequence analysis.

Authors:  Margarita C Posso; Teresa Puig; Ma Jesus Quintana; Judit Solà-Roca; Xavier Bonfill
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Point-of-care and point-of-procedure optical imaging technologies for primary care and global health.

Authors:  Stephen A Boppart; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Towards personalized screening: Cumulative risk of breast cancer screening outcomes in women with and without a first-degree relative with a history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Theodora Maria Ripping; Rebecca A Hubbard; Johannes D M Otten; Gerard J den Heeten; André L M Verbeek; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Annual mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in women from age 40 years: long-term follow-up of the UK Age RCT.

Authors:  Stephen Duffy; Daniel Vulkan; Howard Cuckle; Dharmishta Parmar; Shama Sheikh; Robert Smith; Andrew Evans; Oleg Blyuss; Louise Johns; Ian Ellis; Peter Sasieni; Chris Wale; Jonathan Myles; Sue Moss
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Diagnostic and therapeutic path of breast cancer: effectiveness, appropriateness, and costs--results from the DOCMa study.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Giovagnoli; Adriana Bonifacino; Cosimo Neglia; Marco Benvenuto; Francesco Vincenzo Sambati; Lorenzo Giolli; Alessandra Giovagnoli; Prisco Piscitelli
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Autoantibodies in Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Femina Rauf; Karen S Anderson; Joshua LaBaer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.