Literature DB >> 24990977

Rate of and Risk Factors for Reoperations After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada.

Timothy Leroux1, David Wasserstein1, Patrick Henry1, Amir Khoshbin1, Tim Dwyer2, Darrell Ogilvie-Harris3, Nizar Mahomed3, Christian Veillette3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reoperation rates following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of midshaft clavicle fractures have been described, but reported rates of nonunion, malunion, infection, and implant removal have varied. We sought to establish baseline rates of, and risk factors for, reoperations following clavicle ORIF in a large population cohort.
METHODS: Administrative databases were used to identify patients sixteen to sixty years of age who had undergone an ORIF of a closed, midshaft clavicle fracture from April 2002 to April 2010. The primary outcome was a reoperation within two years (isolated implant removal, irrigation and debridement [deep infection], pseudarthrosis reconstruction [nonunion], or clavicle osteotomy [malunion]). The secondary outcome was rare perioperative complications, including pneumothorax, subclavian vasculature injury, and brachial plexus injury. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the influence of patient and provider factors on these outcomes.
RESULTS: We identified 1350 patients who underwent midshaft clavicle ORIF (median age, thirty-two years [interquartile range, twenty-one to forty-four years]; 81.3% male). One in four patients (24.6%) underwent at least one clavicle reoperation. The most common procedure was isolated implant removal (18.8%), and females were at highest risk (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; p = 0.002). The median time to implant removal was twelve months. A reoperation secondary to nonunion, deep infection, and malunion occurred in 2.6%, 2.6%, and 1.1% of the patients after a median of six, five, and fourteen months, respectively. Risk factors for clavicle nonunion included female sex (OR, 2.2; p = 0.04) and a high comorbidity score (OR, 2.8; p = 0.009). For surgeons, fewer years in practice was associated with a small risk of the patient developing an infection (OR, 1.1; p < 0.001). Sixteen pneumothoraces (1.2%) were identified; however, brachial plexus and subclavian vessel injuries were each found in five or fewer patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Following clavicle ORIF, one in four patients underwent a reoperation. The most common procedure was implant removal, and although the rates of reoperations secondary to nonunion, malunion, and infection were low they were higher than previously reported. Pneumothoraces and neurovascular injuries were infrequent and should continue to be considered rare complications of clavicle ORIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24990977     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  34 in total

1.  Operative versus nonoperative interventions for common fractures of the clavicle: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Tahira Devji; Ydo Kleinlugtenbelt; Nathan Evaniew; Bill Ristevski; Shoghag Khoudigian; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-11-10

Review 2.  [Intramedullary nailing in diaphyseal clavicle fractures using minimally invasive percutaneous reduction].

Authors:  M Müller; T Freude; U Stöckle; T M Kraus
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  High Irritation and Removal Rates After Plate or Nail Fixation in Patients With Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.

Authors:  Martijn H J Hulsmans; Mark van Heijl; R Marijn Houwert; Eric R Hammacher; Sven A G Meylaerts; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Egbert J M M Verleisdonk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Implant Removal Due to Infection After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: Trends and Predictors.

Authors:  Alec S Kellish; Alisina Shahi; Julio A Rodriguez; Kudret Usmani; Michael Boniello; Ali Oliashirazi; Kenneth Graf; Henry Dolch; David Fuller; Rakesh P Mashru
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-06

5.  Comparative study suggests that human bone morphogenetic proteins have no influence on the outcome of operative treatment of aseptic clavicle non-unions.

Authors:  Christian von Rüden; Mario Morgenstern; Jan Friederichs; Peter Augat; Simon Hackl; Alexander Woltmann; Volker Bühren; Christian Hierholzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The effect of patient, provider and surgical factors on survivorship of high tibial osteotomy to total knee arthroplasty: a population-based study.

Authors:  Amir Khoshbin; Ujash Sheth; Darrell Ogilvie-Harris; Nizar Mahomed; Richard Jenkinson; Rajiv Gandhi; David Wasserstein
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Unplanned Operations and Adverse Events after Surgery for Diaphyseal Fracture of the Clavicle.

Authors:  Femke M A P Claessen; Ilse Schol; David Ring
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 8.  Clavicle Malunions: Surgical Treatment and Outcome-a Literature Review.

Authors:  Claudia Christine Sidler-Maier; Nicolas J Dedy; Emil H Schemitsch; Michael D McKee
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-11-02

9.  Trauma fellowship impact on trends and complications of operatively treated clavicle fractures in recently trained orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  Mufaddal M Gombera; Brent J Morris; Hussein A Elkousy; Mitzi S Laughlin; Emily A Vidal; Mark R Brinker
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-09-06

10.  Outcomes and complications after dual plate vs. single plate fixation of displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Z You; Halli Krzyzaniak; Joseph K Kendal; C Ryan Martin; Prism S Schneider
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.