Literature DB >> 24990634

Relationship of Inglehart's and Schwartz's value dimensions revisited.

Henrik Dobewall1, Micha Strack.   

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between Inglehart's and Schwartz's value dimensions-both at the individual and the country levels. By rotating one set of items towards the other, we show that these value dimensions have more in common than previously reported. The ranking of countries (N = 47) based on Schwartz's Embeddedness--Autonomy and the Survival--Self-Expression dimensions reached a maximum of similarity, r = .82, after rotating Inglehart's factor scores 27 degrees clockwise. The correlation between the other pair of dimensions (Schwartz's Hierarchy-Mastery--Egalitarianism-Harmony and Inglehart's Traditional--Secular-Rational values) was near zero before and after rotation. At the individual level (N = 46,444), positive correlations were found for Schwartz's Conservation--Openness dimension with both of Inglehart's dimensions (Survival--Self-Expression and Traditional--Secular-Rational values). The highest correlation with this Schwartz dimension was obtained at the Secular-Rational/Self-Expression diagonal, r = .24, after rotating the factor scores 45 degrees clockwise. We conclude that Schwartz's and Inglehart's originally proposed two-dimensional value structures share one dimension at the country level and some commonality at the individual level, whereas the respective other pair of dimensions seem to be more or less unrelated.
© 2013 International Union of Psychological Science.

Keywords:  Canonical analysis; Cross-cultural studies; Individual and country level of analysis; Rotation of orthogonal factors; Values

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24990634     DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychol        ISSN: 0020-7594


  2 in total

1.  Effects of country success on COVID-19 cumulative cases and excess deaths in 169 countries.

Authors:  A Kaklauskas; V Milevicius; L Kaklauskiene
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.958

2.  An Empirical Comparison of Human Value Models.

Authors:  Paul H P Hanel; Lukas F Litzellachner; Gregory R Maio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.