| Literature DB >> 24990594 |
H Quan1, L Moskal2, A J Forster3, S Brien4, R Walker1, P S Romano5, V Sundararajan6, B Burnand7, G Henriksson8, O Steinum8, S Droesler9, H A Pincus10, W A Ghali11.
Abstract
Hospital-based medical records are abstracted to create International Classification of Disease (ICD) coded discharge health data in many countries. The 'main condition' is not defined in a consistent manner internationally. Some countries employ a 'reason for admission' rule as the basis for the main condition, while other countries employ a 'resource use' rule. A few countries have recently transitioned from one of these approaches to the other. The definition of 'main condition' in such ICD data matters when it is used to define a disease cohort to assign diagnosis-related groups and to perform risk adjustment. We propose a method of harmonizing the international definition to enable researchers and international organizations using ICD-coded health data to aggregate or compare hospital care and outcomes across countries in a consistent manner. Inter-observer reliability of alternative harmonization approaches should be evaluated before finalizing the definition and adopting it worldwide.Keywords: benchmarking; international classification of disease; measurement of quality; standards
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24990594 PMCID: PMC4207866 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Qual Health Care ISSN: 1353-4505 Impact factor: 2.038