Literature DB >> 24990549

Diffusion of surgical innovations, patient safety, and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

J Kellogg Parsons1, Karen Messer2, Kerrin Palazzi3, Sean P Stroup4, David Chang5.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Surgical innovations disseminate in the absence of coordinated systems to ensure their safe integration into clinical practice, potentially exposing patients to increased risk for medical error.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations of patient safety with the diffusion of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) resulting from the development of the da Vinci robot. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cohort study of 401 325 patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample who underwent radical prostatectomy during MIRP diffusion between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2009. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), which measure processes of care and surgical provider performance. We estimated the prevalence of MIRP among all prostatectomies and compared PSI incidence between MIRP and open radical prostatectomy in each year during the study. We also collected estimates of MIRP incidence attributed to the manufacturer of the da Vinci robot.
RESULTS: Patients who underwent MIRP were more likely to be white (P = .004), have fewer comorbidities (P = .02), and have undergone surgery in higher-income areas (P = .005). The incidence of MIRP was substantially lower than da Vinci manufacturer estimates. Rapid diffusion onset occurred in 2006, when MIRP accounted for 10.4% (95% CI, 10.2-10.7) of all radical prostatectomies in the United States. In 2005, MIRP was associated with an increased adjusted risk for any PSI (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7; P = .02) vs open radical prostatectomy. Stratification by hospital status demonstrated similar patterns: rapid diffusion onset among teaching hospitals occurred in 2006 (11.7%; 95% CI, 11.3-12.0), with an increased risk for PSI for MIRP in 2005 (adjusted odds ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.3; P = .004), and onset among nonteaching hospitals occurred in 2008 (27.1%; 95% CI, 26.6-27.7), with an increased but nonsignificant risk for PSI in 2007 (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 0.8-5.2; P = .14). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: During its initial national diffusion, MIRP was associated with diminished perioperative patient safety. To promote safety and protect patients, the processes by which surgical innovations disseminate into clinical practice require refinement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24990549      PMCID: PMC4373702          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  25 in total

1.  Robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Gagan Gautam; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Minimally invasive open retropubic prostatectomy: in experienced hands--still the gold standard.

Authors:  Judd W Moul
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.990

3.  A national profile of patient safety in U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Patrick S Romano; Jeffrey J Geppert; Sheryl Davies; Marlene R Miller; Anne Elixhauser; Kathryn M McDonald
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of medicare-age men.

Authors:  Michael J Barry; Patricia M Gallagher; Jonathan S Skinner; Floyd J Fowler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Elena B Elkin; Lindsay M Jacks; David S Yee; Thomas L Jang; Vincent P Laudone; Bertrand D Guillonneau; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; James A Eastham; Caroline Savage; A C Maschino; Vincent P Laudone; Christopher B Dechet; Robert A Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Overcoming the challenges of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  M A Goldstraw; B J Challacombe; K Patil; P Amoroso; P Dasgupta; R S Kirby
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Barry; Anthony V D'Amico; Aaron C Weinberg; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Underreporting of robotic surgery complications.

Authors:  Michol A Cooper; Andrew Ibrahim; Heather Lyu; Martin A Makary
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.095

10.  Has laparoscopic cholecystectomy changed patterns of practice and patient outcome in Ontario?

Authors:  M M Cohen; W Young; M E Thériault; R Hernandez
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  20 in total

1.  [Minimally invasive vs. open surgical procedures in the treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Wirth; M Fröhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Work-system interventions in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review exploring the gap between challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Falisha Kanji; Ken Catchpole; Eunice Choi; Myrtede Alfred; Kate Cohen; Daniel Shouhed; Jennifer Anger; Tara Cohen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches in pediatric urology: Trends in utilization and complications.

Authors:  Rohit Tejwani; Brian J Young; Hsin-Hsiao S Wang; Steven Wolf; J Todd Purves; John S Wiener; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 1.830

4.  National trends and differences in morbidity among surgical approaches for radical prostatectomy in Germany.

Authors:  Jens Uwe Stolzenburg; Iason Kyriazis; Claus Fahlenbrach; Christian Gilfrich; Christian Günster; Elke Jeschke; Gralf Popken; Lothar Weißbach; Christoph von Zastrow; Hanna Leicht
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  The role of the assistant during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: does experience matter?

Authors:  Aaron M Potretzke; Brent A Knight; John A Brockman; Joel Vetter; Robert S Figenshau; Sam B Bhayani; Brian M Benway
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-04-02

6.  Diffusion of robotic-assisted laparoscopic technology across specialties: a national study from 2008 to 2013.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Aditya Mantha; Ahmad Abiri; Anne Lin; Erik Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Development and Validation of Objective Performance Metrics for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Jian Chen; Anthony Jarc; David Hatcher; Hooman Djaladat; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Consensus statement on definition, diagnosis, and management of high-risk prostate cancer patients on behalf of the Spanish Groups of Uro-Oncology Societies URONCOR, GUO, and SOGUG.

Authors:  I Henríquez; A Rodríguez-Antolín; J Cassinello; C Gonzalez San Segundo; M Unda; E Gallardo; J López-Torrecilla; A Juarez; J Arranz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Socioeconomic factors and parity of access to robotic surgery in a county health system.

Authors:  Leah Carey Tatebe; Regan Gray; Ken Tatebe; Fernando Garcia; Bradley Putty
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-02-28

10.  Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share?

Authors:  Deborah R Kaye; Jeffrey K Mullins; H Ballentine Carter; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.