PURPOSE: We evaluated the ability of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 3 tesla for diagnosing T stage and detecting stalks in bladder cancer. METHODS: In total, 39 consecutive patients with bladder tumors underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging that included T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and DWI using a 3T MR scanner. Two radiologists interpreted T2WI plus DWI and T2WI for diagnosis of T stage and for detection of stalks. We used McNemar's test to examine differences in diagnostic performance and Fisher's exact test to evaluate differences in stalk detection frequency. RESULTS: Specificity and accuracy in differentiating T1 tumors from T2 to T4 tumors were significantly better with T2WI plus DWI (83% [20/24] and 85% [33/39]) than T2WI (50% [12/24] and 67% [26/39]; P = 0.02), and accuracy for diagnosing tumor stage was significantly better with T2WI plus DWI (82% [32/39]) than T2WI alone (59% [23/39]; P = 0.03). The observers identified stalks in 11 tumors by T2WI (48% [11/23]) and 17 by DWI (74% [17/23]) (P < 0.03). CONCLUSION: DWI at 3T was superior to T2WI for evaluating the T stage of bladder cancer, particularly in differentiating T1 tumors from those T2 or higher, and in detecting stalks of papillary bladder tumors.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the ability of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 3 tesla for diagnosing T stage and detecting stalks in bladder cancer. METHODS: In total, 39 consecutive patients with bladder tumors underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging that included T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and DWI using a 3T MR scanner. Two radiologists interpreted T2WI plus DWI and T2WI for diagnosis of T stage and for detection of stalks. We used McNemar's test to examine differences in diagnostic performance and Fisher's exact test to evaluate differences in stalk detection frequency. RESULTS: Specificity and accuracy in differentiating T1 tumors from T2 to T4 tumors were significantly better with T2WI plus DWI (83% [20/24] and 85% [33/39]) than T2WI (50% [12/24] and 67% [26/39]; P = 0.02), and accuracy for diagnosing tumor stage was significantly better with T2WI plus DWI (82% [32/39]) than T2WI alone (59% [23/39]; P = 0.03). The observers identified stalks in 11 tumors by T2WI (48% [11/23]) and 17 by DWI (74% [17/23]) (P < 0.03). CONCLUSION: DWI at 3T was superior to T2WI for evaluating the T stage of bladder cancer, particularly in differentiating T1 tumors from those T2 or higher, and in detecting stalks of papillary bladder tumors.