Literature DB >> 24990454

Revisiting the left-wing response to sociobiology: the case of Finland in a European context.

Antti Lepistö1.   

Abstract

This article revisits the left-wing response to sociobiology in the 1970s and 1980s by examining the sociobiology debate in Finland in a larger European context. It argues that the Finnish academic left's response to sociobiology represents a "third way" alongside the purely negative, often Marxist denial of biology's relevance, which characterized the left's response to sociobiology in many European countries such as Hungary and Sweden, and alongside the disregard that sociobiology confronted in most parts of Eastern Europe, as well as in Germany. In the context of the last great political conflict of the Cold War in Europe, the controversy over the American "Euromissiles" (Pershing II and Tomahawk) in 1979-1983, the Finnish academic left challenged the allegedly fatalistic sociobiological aggression and war theories with an alternative biological language, turning the increasing enthusiasm over evolutionary ideas into a pacifist cause. Using leftist and pacifist forums to inform citizens and politicians of such biologically evolved human characteristics as mutual care and sociability, the Finnish critics of sociobiology wished to boost the public spirit, and to rationalize the pacifist ideal of the European-wide popular movement against nuclear weapons and militarism. As a result, the academic leftists in Finland revived the early twentieth-century tradition of "peace biology." A proper understanding of this development calls for an analysis that acknowledges Finland's special geopolitical and cultural position in the Cold War world between East and West.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24990454     DOI: 10.1007/s10739-014-9386-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hist Biol        ISSN: 0022-5010            Impact factor:   1.326


  8 in total

1.  The making of a Darwinian left. [Review of: Dickens, P. Social Darwinism, 2000; Lewontin, R. The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment, 2000; Singer, P. A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution and Cooperation, 1999].

Authors:  H L Kaye
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2001-10

2.  Sociobiology--another biological determinism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.589

3.  Science as ideology: the rejection and reception of sociobiology in China.

Authors:  Li Jianhui; Hong Fan
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.326

4.  Anecdotal, historical and critical commentaries on genetics. John Maynard Smith: January 6, 1920-April 19, 2004.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Contexts constrain science in the public: How the sociobiology debate was (not) presented in the German press.

Authors:  Sebastian Linke
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2011-03-01

6.  Public perception of evolution and the rise of evolutionary psychology in Finland.

Authors:  Vienna Setälä; Esa Väliverronen
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2011-07

7.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.

Authors:  S J Gould; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

8.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.