Marie-José Durand1, Marc Corbière1, Marie-France Coutu1, Daniel Reinharz2, Valérie Albert1. 1. University of Sherbrooke, Center for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Hôpital Charles-LeMoyne Research Center, Longueuil, QC, Canada. 2. Laval University, Social and Preventive Medicine, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, QC, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Workplace absenteeism is still a curse for developed countries, and more systematic practices need to be adopted to address this issue. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on best practices for managing work absences related to musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. METHODS: A review was conducted by performing a search in bibliographic databases and on work-disability research institute websites. Recommendations regarding work-absence management and return-to-work practices were extracted from all the retained documents and organized within a chronological framework. RESULTS: In total, 17 documents were analyzed, leading to identification of common work-absence management and return-to-work practices, the importance of a worker support approach, and recommended roles and responsibilities for stakeholders. These practices were then integrated into a six-step process: (1) time off and recovery period; (2) initial contact with the worker; (3) evaluation of the worker and his job tasks; (4) development of a return-to-work plan with accommodations; (5) work resumption, and (6) follow-up of the return-to-work process. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review, we constructed a comprehensive work-absence management and return-to-work process designed to assist organizations. Our results indicate that such a process must be included within a broader policy of health promotion and job retention. Adaptations will be required for implementation in the workplace.
BACKGROUND: Workplace absenteeism is still a curse for developed countries, and more systematic practices need to be adopted to address this issue. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on best practices for managing work absences related to musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. METHODS: A review was conducted by performing a search in bibliographic databases and on work-disability research institute websites. Recommendations regarding work-absence management and return-to-work practices were extracted from all the retained documents and organized within a chronological framework. RESULTS: In total, 17 documents were analyzed, leading to identification of common work-absence management and return-to-work practices, the importance of a worker support approach, and recommended roles and responsibilities for stakeholders. These practices were then integrated into a six-step process: (1) time off and recovery period; (2) initial contact with the worker; (3) evaluation of the worker and his job tasks; (4) development of a return-to-work plan with accommodations; (5) work resumption, and (6) follow-up of the return-to-work process. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review, we constructed a comprehensive work-absence management and return-to-work process designed to assist organizations. Our results indicate that such a process must be included within a broader policy of health promotion and job retention. Adaptations will be required for implementation in the workplace.
Entities:
Keywords:
Absenteeism; mental illness; organizational policy; pain; work disability
Authors: Patrizia Villotti; Andrea Gragnano; Christian Larivière; Alessia Negrini; Clermont E Dionne; Marc Corbière Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2021-03
Authors: Tyler J Lane; Rebbecca Lilley; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Anthony D LaMontagne; Malcolm R Sim; Peter M Smith Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2018-06