Literature DB >> 24989790

Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.

K McMaster1, L Sanchez-Ramos, A M Kaunitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of misoprostol for the induction of labour remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol tablets for the induction of labour and cervical ripening. SEARCH STRATEGY: We performed electronic and manual searches to identify relevant randomised trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: The efficacy outcomes assessed were rates of vaginal delivery within 24 hours, delivery within one dose, and oxytocin augmentation, and interval to delivery. The safety outcomes assessed were incidences of tachysystole, hyperstimulation, caesarean delivery, cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart rate (FHR), operative vaginal delivery, abnormal 5-minute Apgar score, abnormal cord gas values, admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and meconium passage. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Thirteen studies (1945 women) were included. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed-effects and random-effects models. MAIN
RESULTS: We found that 25 micrograms was less efficacious, with lower rates of delivery after one dose (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39-0.88) and vaginal delivery within 24 hours (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.79-0.96), and with increased rates of oxytocin augmentation (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.36-1.75). We noted an improved safety profile with 25 micrograms, however, with decreased rates of tachysystole (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.35-0.61), hyperstimulation (RR 0.5; 95% CI 0.31-0.78), caesarean deliveries for non-reassuring FHR (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.52-0.87), NICU admissions (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.4-0.98), and meconium passage (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.45-0.96).
CONCLUSIONS: Although 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol may be more efficacious, safety concerns make the 25-microgram dose preferable.
© 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical ripening; induction of labour; misoprostol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24989790     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  2 in total

1.  Comparative study of dinoprostone and misoprostol for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 35 weeks.

Authors:  Flavie Sire; Laure Ponthier; Jean-Luc Eyraud; Cyrille Catalan; Yves Aubard; Perrine Coste Mazeau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study.

Authors:  Markus Schmidt; Maria Neophytou; Olaf Hars; Julia Freudenberg; Maritta Kühnert
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.344

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.