Literature DB >> 24989334

Laser-assisted hatching of cleavage-stage embryos impairs developmental potential and increases DNA damage in blastocysts.

Sachin D Honguntikar1, Shubhashree Uppangala, Sujith R Salian, Guruprasad Kalthur, Pratap Kumar, Satish K Adiga.   

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the influence of two- (day 2) and six-to-eight-cell-stage (day 3) laser-assisted hatchings on the developmental potential and genetic integrity of the embryos. In this prospective experimental study, two- and six-to-eight-cell-stage mouse embryos were subjected to laser hatching using 1,480 nm diode laser, and then assessed for the developmental potential and DNA integrity in blastocysts. Similarly, four-cell-stage human embryos from 20 patients were also subjected to laser hatching, and then assessed for the developmental competence. Laser-assisted hatching in mouse embryos significantly enhanced the blastocyst hatching potential on day 4.5 (P < 0.0001). However, a significant decline in blastocyst total cell number (TCN) was observed in six-to-eight-cell-stage laser-hatched embryos (P < 0.001). Conversely, no significant difference in TCN was observed between laser-hatched and unhatched human four-cell-stage embryos after 24 h. Attempt to understand the genetic integrity in laser-hatched mouse blastocysts revealed significantly higher labeling index when hatching was done at two- (P < 0.01) and six-to-eight-cell stage (P < 0.05). DNA damage induced by the laser manipulation may affect implantation and postimplantation developmental potential of the embryos. However, further studies are required to elucidate the impact of laser-induced DNA damage on the reproductive outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24989334     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-014-1625-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  31 in total

1.  p21 provides stage specific DNA damage control to preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  S K Adiga; M Toyoshima; K Shiraishi; T Shimura; J Takeda; M Taga; H Nagai; P Kumar; O Niwa
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  The role of assisted hatching in in vitro fertilization: a review of the literature. A Committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind study for the evaluation of assisted hatching in patients with advanced maternal age.

Authors:  S E Lanzendorf; F Nehchiri; J F Mayer; S Oehninger; S J Muasher
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Hypersensitivity to DNA damage leads to increased apoptosis during early mouse development.

Authors:  B S Heyer; A MacAuley; O Behrendtsen; Z Werb
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis.

Authors:  J Cohen; M Alikani; J Trowbridge; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Assisted hatching does not enhance IVF success in good-prognosis patients.

Authors:  B S Hurst; K E Tucker; C A Awoniyi; W D Schlaff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Delayed and stage specific phosphorylation of H2AX during preimplantation development of gamma-irradiated mouse embryos.

Authors:  Satish Kumar Adiga; Megumi Toyoshima; Tsutomu Shimura; Jun Takeda; Norio Uematsu; Ohtsura Niwa
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Non-contact microdrilling of mouse zona pellucida with an objective-delivered 1.48-microns diode laser.

Authors:  K Rink; G Delacrétaz; R P Salathé; A Senn; D Nocera; M Germond; P De Grandi; S Fakan
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Randomized controlled study of human zona pellucida dissection using the zona infrared laser optical system: evaluation of blastomere damage, embryo development, and subsequent hatching.

Authors:  Benjamin C Wong; Catherine A Boyd; Susan E Lanzendorf
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  The transition from maternal to embryonic control in the 2-cell mouse embryo.

Authors:  G Flach; M H Johnson; P R Braude; R A Taylor; V N Bolton
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Effect of Assisted Hatching on Live Birth Rate Following Fresh Embryo Transfer in Advanced Maternal Age.

Authors:  Samer Tannus; Yoni Cohen; Sara Henderson; Weon-Young Son; Togas Tulandi
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 2.  The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.

Authors:  Karen Sermon; Antonio Capalbo; Jacques Cohen; Edith Coonen; Martine De Rycke; Anick De Vos; Joy Delhanty; Francesco Fiorentino; Norbert Gleicher; Georg Griesinger; Jamie Grifo; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Georgia Kokkali; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; David Meldrum; Marcos Meseguer; Markus Montag; Santiago Munné; Laura Rienzi; Carmen Rubio; Katherine Scott; Richard Scott; Carlos Simon; Jason Swain; Nathan Treff; Filippo Ubaldi; Rita Vassena; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Willem Verpoest; Dagan Wells; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Epigenetic changes in preimplantation embryos subjected to laser manipulation.

Authors:  Sachin D Honguntikar; Sujith Raj Salian; Fiona D'Souza; Shubhashree Uppangala; Guruprasad Kalthur; Satish Kumar Adiga
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Non-Assisted Hatching Trophectoderm Biopsy Does Not Increase The Risks of Most Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcome and May Be More Practical for Busy Clinics: Evidence From China.

Authors:  Shuo Li; Shuiying Ma; Jialin Zhao; Jingmei Hu; Hongchang Li; Yueting Zhu; Wenjie Jiang; Linlin Cui; Junhao Yan; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.555

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.