Literature DB >> 24989058

COPD phenotypes in a lung cancer screening population.

Arzu Balkan1, Yonca Bulut2, Carl R Fuhrman3, Stephen N Fisher3, David O Wilson4, Joel L Weissfeld5, Frank C Sciurba4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) is a very heterogeneous disease, and phenotypic categorization of a high-risk population has many potential benefits. The present study uses a symptom questionnaire, low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFT) to phenotypically subgroup a high-risk population.
METHODS: Study group consisted of current or former smokers who underwent lung cancer screening with LDCT as a subgroup of Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study. In addition to LDCT, PFT and a symptom query questionnaire were obtained from each patient.
RESULTS: The study group consisted of 3183 subjects (age 50-79) subdivided into eight groups according to presence of symptoms, obstruction on PFT and presence of emphysema on LDCT. A total of 501 (15.7%) subjects were asymptomatic, with no airflow obstruction or evidence of emphysema. There were 866 (27.2%) subjects with both obstruction on PFT and emphysema on LDCT, but only 660 (20.7%) had symptoms. Five hundred thirty (16.6%) of the subjects had no emphysema on LDCT but had obstruction on PFT, although only 370 (11.6%) had symptoms. Four hundred seventy-four (14.9%) of subjects had emphysema on LDCT, but no airflow obstruction, with 312 (9.8%) symptomatic. Finally, 812 (25.5%) of subjects had no evidence of airflow obstruction on PFT or emphysema on LDCT, but had symptoms.
CONCLUSION: Combining LDCT with PFT and a comprehensive questionnaire allows subgroup classification of COPD phenotypes in a high-risk population and may lead to earlier intervention and an improved framework for future studies.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; computed tomography; pulmonary function tests

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24989058     DOI: 10.1111/crj.12180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Respir J        ISSN: 1752-6981            Impact factor:   2.570


  5 in total

Review 1.  Aging and Lung Disease. Clinical Impact and Cellular and Molecular Pathways.

Authors:  Mauricio Rojas; Ana L Mora; Maria Kapetanaki; Nathaniel Weathington; Mark Gladwin; Oliver Eickelberg
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-12

2.  Radiologic Features of Small Pulmonary Nodules and Lung Cancer Risk in the National Lung Screening Trial: A Nested Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Hua Wang; Qian Li; Melissa J McGettigan; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Alberto L Garcia; Zachary J Thompson; John J Heine; Zhaoxiang Ye; Robert J Gillies; Matthew B Schabath
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Risk of Lung Cancer Associated with COPD Phenotype Based on Quantitative Image Analysis.

Authors:  Ann G Schwartz; Christine M Lusk; Angela S Wenzlaff; Donovan Watza; Stephanie Pandolfi; Laura Mantha; Michele L Cote; Ayman O Soubani; Garrett Walworth; Antoinette Wozniak; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Amy A Ardisana; Michael J Flynn; Thomas Song; David L Spizarny; Paul A Kvale; Robert A Chapman; Shirish M Gadgeel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and subsequent overall and lung cancer mortality in low-income adults.

Authors:  Melinda C Aldrich; Heather M Munro; Michael Mumma; Eric L Grogan; Pierre P Massion; Timothy S Blackwell; William J Blot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prevalence and burden of bronchiectasis in a lung cancer screening program.

Authors:  Maria Sanchez-Carpintero Abad; Pablo Sanchez-Salcedo; Juan P de-Torres; Ana B Alcaide; Luis M Seijo; Jesus Pueyo; Gorka Bastarrika; Javier J Zulueta; Arantza Campo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.