Ricardo Cáceda1, Dante Durand, Edmi Cortes, Stefania Prendes-Alvarez, Tori Moskovciak, Philip D Harvey, Charles B Nemeroff. 1. From the Psychiatric Research Institute (R.C.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (D.D., E.C., S.P.-A., T.M., P.D.H., C.B.N.), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; and Research Service (P.D.H.), Miami VA Medical Center, Miami, Florida.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Despite identification of several risk factors, suicide prediction and prevention is still a clinical challenge. Suicide can be seen as a consequence of poor decision making triggered by overwhelming psychological pain. We examined the relationship of choice impulsivity and psychological pain in depressed patients with acute suicidality. METHODS: Impulsive choice (delay discounting), psychological pain, and clinical characteristics were assessed in four groups of adults (N = 20-22): a) depressed patients within 72 hours after a suicide attempt, b) depressed patients with active suicidal ideation, c) nonsuicidal depressed patients, and d) healthy controls. RESULTS: Impulsive choice was higher in the suicide attempt (0.114 [0.027]) and ideation (0.099 [0.020]) groups compared with nonsuicidal depressed (0.079 [0.020]) and healthy (0.066 [0.019]) individuals (F(3,79) = 3.06, p = .042). Psychological pain data showed a similar profile (F(3,78) = 43.48, p < .001), with 43.4 (2.9) rating of psychological pain for the suicide attempt, 54.3 (2.2) for suicide ideation, 37.0 (3.2) for nonsuicidal depressed, and 13.7 (0.5) for healthy groups. Within the suicide attempt group, persisting suicidal ideation was associated with more severe depression (36.6 [2.9] versus 21.5 [3.1], p = .007) and choice impulsivity (0.134 [0.03] versus 0.078 [0.04], p = .015). Both measures normalized within a week: depression (29.9 [2.6] versus 14.4 [3.0], p = .006) and choice impulsivity (0.114 [0.026] versus 0.066 [0.032], p = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Transient impulsive choice abnormalities are found in a subset of those who attempt suicide. Both, suicidal ideation and behavior were associated with choice impulsivity and intense psychological pain.
OBJECTIVE: Despite identification of several risk factors, suicide prediction and prevention is still a clinical challenge. Suicide can be seen as a consequence of poor decision making triggered by overwhelming psychological pain. We examined the relationship of choice impulsivity and psychological pain in depressedpatients with acute suicidality. METHODS: Impulsive choice (delay discounting), psychological pain, and clinical characteristics were assessed in four groups of adults (N = 20-22): a) depressedpatients within 72 hours after a suicide attempt, b) depressedpatients with active suicidal ideation, c) nonsuicidal depressedpatients, and d) healthy controls. RESULTS: Impulsive choice was higher in the suicide attempt (0.114 [0.027]) and ideation (0.099 [0.020]) groups compared with nonsuicidal depressed (0.079 [0.020]) and healthy (0.066 [0.019]) individuals (F(3,79) = 3.06, p = .042). Psychological pain data showed a similar profile (F(3,78) = 43.48, p < .001), with 43.4 (2.9) rating of psychological pain for the suicide attempt, 54.3 (2.2) for suicide ideation, 37.0 (3.2) for nonsuicidal depressed, and 13.7 (0.5) for healthy groups. Within the suicide attempt group, persisting suicidal ideation was associated with more severe depression (36.6 [2.9] versus 21.5 [3.1], p = .007) and choice impulsivity (0.134 [0.03] versus 0.078 [0.04], p = .015). Both measures normalized within a week: depression (29.9 [2.6] versus 14.4 [3.0], p = .006) and choice impulsivity (0.114 [0.026] versus 0.066 [0.032], p = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Transient impulsive choice abnormalities are found in a subset of those who attempt suicide. Both, suicidal ideation and behavior were associated with choice impulsivity and intense psychological pain.
Authors: Seog Ju Kim; Seung-Gul Kang; In Hee Cho; Yu-Jin G Lee; Jin Pyo Hong; Juhyun Park; Yu Jin Lee Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-08 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Elizabeth A Olson; Roselinde H Kaiser; Diego A Pizzagalli; Scott L Rauch; Isabelle M Rosso Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2017-11-16
Authors: Michael Amlung; Emma Marsden; Katherine Holshausen; Vanessa Morris; Herry Patel; Lana Vedelago; Katherine R Naish; Derek D Reed; Randi E McCabe Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Aiste Lengvenyte; Robertas Strumila; Philippe Courtet; Scott Y H Kim; Emilie Olié Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Richard T Liu; Zoë M Trout; Evelyn M Hernandez; Shayna M Cheek; Nimesha Gerlus Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Ricardo Cáceda; G Andrew James; Zachary N Stowe; Pedro L Delgado; Nolan Kordsmeier; Clint D Kilts Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2019-03-23 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Ricardo Cáceda; Jessica M Carbajal; Ronald M Salomon; Jordan E Moore; Greg Perlman; Prasad R Padala; Abdullah Hasan; Pedro L Delgado Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 4.600