Övgü Kaynak1, Ken C Winters2, John Cacciola3, Kimberly C Kirby3, Amelia M Arria4. 1. Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Center on Young Adult Health and Development, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, Maryland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There have been conflicting findings in the literature concerning the risks to adolescents when parents provide them with alcohol. Studies have examined various ways in which parents directly affect adolescent alcohol consumption through provision (e.g., parental offers, parental allowance/supervision, parental presence while drinking, and parental supply). This review synthesizes findings on the direct ways parental provision can influence a child's alcohol consumption and related problems in an effort to provide parents with science-based guidance. We describe potential mechanisms of the relationship between these parental influences and adolescent problems, suggest future directions for research, and discuss implications for parents. METHOD: Twenty-two studies (a mix of cross-sectional and longitudinal) that empirically examined the association between parental provision and adolescent drinking outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Parental provision was generally associated with increased adolescent alcohol use and, in some instances, increased heavy episodic drinking as well as higher rates of alcohol-related problems. Data in support of the view that parental provision serves as a protective factor in the face of other risk factors were equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: The nature and extent of the risks associated with parental provision, and the potential mechanisms underlying this association, are complex issues. Although more rigorous studies with longitudinal designs are needed, parents should be aware of potential risks associated with providing adolescents with alcohol and a place to drink. It is recommended that parents discourage drinking until adolescents reach legal age.
OBJECTIVE: There have been conflicting findings in the literature concerning the risks to adolescents when parents provide them with alcohol. Studies have examined various ways in which parents directly affect adolescent alcohol consumption through provision (e.g., parental offers, parental allowance/supervision, parental presence while drinking, and parental supply). This review synthesizes findings on the direct ways parental provision can influence a child's alcohol consumption and related problems in an effort to provide parents with science-based guidance. We describe potential mechanisms of the relationship between these parental influences and adolescent problems, suggest future directions for research, and discuss implications for parents. METHOD: Twenty-two studies (a mix of cross-sectional and longitudinal) that empirically examined the association between parental provision and adolescent drinking outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Parental provision was generally associated with increased adolescent alcohol use and, in some instances, increased heavy episodic drinking as well as higher rates of alcohol-related problems. Data in support of the view that parental provision serves as a protective factor in the face of other risk factors were equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: The nature and extent of the risks associated with parental provision, and the potential mechanisms underlying this association, are complex issues. Although more rigorous studies with longitudinal designs are needed, parents should be aware of potential risks associated with providing adolescents with alcohol and a place to drink. It is recommended that parents discourage drinking until adolescents reach legal age.
Authors: Donald W Zeigler; Claire C Wang; Richard A Yoast; Barry D Dickinson; Mary Anne McCaffree; Carolyn B Robinowitz; Melvyn L Sterling Journal: Prev Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Ina M Koning; Wilma A M Vollebergh; Filip Smit; Jacqueline E E Verdurmen; Regina J J M Van Den Eijnden; Tom F M Ter Bogt; Håkan Stattin; Rutger C M E Engels Journal: Addiction Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Brian J Fairman; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Denise L Haynie; Danping Liu; Risë B Goldstein; Ralph W Hingson; Stephen E Gilman Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Hilary F Byrnes; Brenda A Miller; Joel W Grube; Beth Bourdeau; David B Buller; Meme Wang-Schweig; W Gill Woodall Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2019-01-14
Authors: Susan T Ennett; Christine Jackson; Veronica T Cole; Susan Haws; Vangie A Foshee; Heathe Luz McNaughton Reyes; Alison Reimuller Burns; Melissa J Cox; Li Cai Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2015-09-28
Authors: Jennifer L Maggs; Jenna R Cassinat; Brian C Kelly; Sarah A Mustillo; Shawn D Whiteman Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 5.012