Ali Fakhri1, Mohammadreza Maleki1, Mahmoodreza Gohari2, Patrick Harris3. 1. Department of Health Service Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Statistics and Mathematics, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Centre for Health Equity Training, Research and Evaluation, Part of the Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many countries conduct Health Impact Assessment (HIA) of their projects and policies to predict their positive and negative health impacts. In recent years many guides have been developed to inform HIA practice, largely reflecting local developments in HIA. These guides have often been designed for specific contexts and specific need, making the choice between guides difficult. The objective of the current study is to identify underlying principles in order to guide HIA practice in Iran. METHODS: This study was conducted in three stages: 1) Studies comparing HIA guidelines were reviewed to identify criteria used for comparison seeking emphasized principles. 2) The HIA characteristics extracted from published papers were categorized in order to determine the principles that could guide HIA practice. 3) Finally, these principles were agreed by experts using nominal group technique. RESULTS: The review of the studies comparing HIA guides demonstrated there are no clear comparison criteria for reviewing HIA guides and no study mentioned HIA principles. Investigating the HIA principles from peer-reviewed papers, we found 14 issues. These were, considering of general features in planning and conducting HIAs such as HIA stream, level, timing and type, considering of the wider socio-political and economic context, considering of economic, technical and legal aspects of HIA and capacities for HIA, rationality and comprehensiveness, using appropriate evidence, elaborating on HIA relation to other forms of Impact Assessment, considering of equity, and encouraging intersectoral and interdisciplinary cooperation, involvement of stakeholders and transparency as underlying principles to guide HIA practice. The results emphasize how critical these technical as well as tactical considerations are in the early scoping step of an HIA which plans the conduct of the HIA in reponse to local contextual issues. CONCLUSION: Determining the principles of HIA from peer-reviewed papers provides an opportunity for guiding HIA practice comprehensively. It seems to be feasible to develop a universal guide that covers all principles required.
BACKGROUND: Many countries conduct Health Impact Assessment (HIA) of their projects and policies to predict their positive and negative health impacts. In recent years many guides have been developed to inform HIA practice, largely reflecting local developments in HIA. These guides have often been designed for specific contexts and specific need, making the choice between guides difficult. The objective of the current study is to identify underlying principles in order to guide HIA practice in Iran. METHODS: This study was conducted in three stages: 1) Studies comparing HIA guidelines were reviewed to identify criteria used for comparison seeking emphasized principles. 2) The HIA characteristics extracted from published papers were categorized in order to determine the principles that could guide HIA practice. 3) Finally, these principles were agreed by experts using nominal group technique. RESULTS: The review of the studies comparing HIA guides demonstrated there are no clear comparison criteria for reviewing HIA guides and no study mentioned HIA principles. Investigating the HIA principles from peer-reviewed papers, we found 14 issues. These were, considering of general features in planning and conducting HIAs such as HIA stream, level, timing and type, considering of the wider socio-political and economic context, considering of economic, technical and legal aspects of HIA and capacities for HIA, rationality and comprehensiveness, using appropriate evidence, elaborating on HIA relation to other forms of Impact Assessment, considering of equity, and encouraging intersectoral and interdisciplinary cooperation, involvement of stakeholders and transparency as underlying principles to guide HIA practice. The results emphasize how critical these technical as well as tactical considerations are in the early scoping step of an HIA which plans the conduct of the HIA in reponse to local contextual issues. CONCLUSION: Determining the principles of HIA from peer-reviewed papers provides an opportunity for guiding HIA practice comprehensively. It seems to be feasible to develop a universal guide that covers all principles required.
Keywords:
Health Impact Assessment (HIA); Health Policy; Healthy Public Policy
Authors: Gary R Krieger; Jürg Utzinger; Mirko S Winkler; Mark J Divall; Scott D Phillips; Marci Z Balge; Burton H Singer Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-06-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mirko S Winkler; Gary R Krieger; Mark J Divall; Guéladio Cissé; Mark Wielga; Burton H Singer; Marcel Tanner; Jürg Utzinger Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Fiona Haigh; Fran Baum; Andrew L Dannenberg; Mark F Harris; Ben Harris-Roxas; Helen Keleher; Lynn Kemp; Richard Morgan; Harrison N G Chok; Jeff Spickett; Elizabeth Harris Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Meelan Thondoo; David Rojas-Rueda; Joyeeta Gupta; Daniel H de Vries; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Françoise Jabot; Emile Tremblay; Ana Rivadeneyra; Thierno Amadou Diallo; Geneviève Lapointe Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 3.390