| Literature DB >> 24987437 |
Jen-Hwey Chiu1, Chun-Ju Chang2, Jing-Chong Wu3, Hui-Ju Liu4, Che-Sheng Wen5, Chung-Hua Hsu4, Jiun-Liang Chen6, Ling-Ming Tseng7, Wei-Shone Chen8, Yi-Ming Shyr9.
Abstract
Aim. Our aim the was to screen the commonly used Chinese herbs in order to detect changes in ERBB2 and ESR1 gene expression using MCF-7 cells. Methods. Using the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line, cell cytotoxicity and proliferation were evaluated by MTT and trypan blue exclusion assays, respectively. A luciferase reporter assay was established by transient transfecting MCF-7 cells with plasmids containing either the ERBB2 or the ESR1 promoter region linked to the luciferase gene. Chinese herbal extracts were used to treat the cells at 24 h after transfection, followed by measurement of their luciferase activity. The screening results were verified by Western blotting to measure HER2 and ER α protein expression. Results. At concentrations that induced little cytotoxicity, thirteen single herbal extracts and five compound recipes were found to increase either ERBB2 or ESR1 luciferase activity. By Western blotting, Si-Wu-Tang, Kuan-Shin-Yin, and Suan-Tsao-Ren-Tang were found to increase either HER2 or ER α protein expression. In addition, Ligusticum chuanxiong was shown to have a great effect on ERBB2 gene expression and synergistically with estrogen to stimulate MCF-7 cell growth. Conclusion. Our results provide important information that should affect clinical treatment strategies among breast cancer patients who are receiving hormonal or targeted therapies.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24987437 PMCID: PMC4058453 DOI: 10.1155/2014/965486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Commonly used Chinese single herbs and compound recipes in this study.
| Nature | Scientific name | Chinese name | Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qi-supplying |
| huang qi | A |
|
| bai zhu | B | |
|
| fu ling | C | |
|
| gan cao | D | |
|
| huo xiang | E | |
|
| dang shen | F | |
|
| sheng jiang | G | |
|
| |||
| Blood-regulating |
| dang gui | H |
|
| chuan xiong | I | |
|
| suan tsao jen | J | |
|
| ji xue teng | K | |
|
| e zhu | L | |
|
| |||
| Heat-clearing |
| he ye | M |
|
| chai hu | N | |
|
| bo he | O | |
|
| zhi zi | P | |
|
| mu dan pi | Q | |
|
| pu gong ying | R | |
|
| zhi mu | S | |
|
| |||
| Yin-nourishing |
| bai shao | T |
|
| di huang | U | |
|
| nv zhen zi | V | |
|
| |||
| Compound recipes and abbreviations | Si-Wu-Tang | SWT | |
| Jia-Wei-Xiao-Yao-San | JWXYS | ||
| Suan-Zsao-Ren-Tang | SZRT | ||
| Reduced formula of Suan-Zsao-Ren-Tang | r-SZRT* | ||
| K'uan-Hsin-Yin | KHY | ||
| VGH-S4 | VGH-S4 | ||
Scientific name is coded by international binomial nomenclature. VGH-S4 is a compound recipe commonly used in Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
*Reduced formula of Suan-Zsao-Ren-Tang (r-SZRT) is composed of those materials in Suan-Zsao-Ren-Tang except for Ligusticum chuanxiong which is absent.
Effects of commonly used Chinese herbs on cytotoxicity.
| Scientific name | Dose range | Cell survival ≦ 80% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qi-supplying |
| 0.1~10 | (—) |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| |||
| Blood-regulating |
| 0.1~10 | 3 |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| |||
| Heat-clearing |
| 0.1~10 | (—) |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| |||
| Yin-nourishing |
| 0.1~10 | 10 |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| 0.1~10 | (—) | |
|
| |||
| Compound recipes and abbreviations | Si-Wu-Tang | 0.1~10 | (—) |
| Jia-Wei-Xiao-Yao-San | 0.1~10 | (—) | |
| Suan-Zsao-Ren-Tang | 0.1~10 | (—) | |
| Reduced formula of Suan-Zsao-Ren-Tang | 0.1~10 | (—) | |
| K'uan-Hsin-Yin | 0.1~10 | (—) | |
| VGH-S4 | 0.1~10 | (—) | |
Cell cytotoxicity was determined by MTT assay as described in the Methods section. VGH-S4 is a compound recipe commonly used in Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
*P < 0.05 versus vehicle group (n ≥ 4~6).
Figure 1Effects of commonly used Chinese herbal extracts on ERBB2-luciferase activity using the MCF-7 cell line. The MCF-7 line (1 × 105 cells/well) was seeded for 24 h, followed by transfection with the ERBB2-luciferase plasmid and treatment individually with twenty-two single herbal extracts (a) and six compound recipes (b) as described in Section 2. The codes for the twenty-two herbs (from A to V) are described in Section 2. Data are presented as the relative optic density ratio, namely, the ratio of luciferase activity to Renilla luciferase ratio and were analyzed using four to six independent experiments. An asterisk indicates a P value < 0.05 versus the vehicle group by one-way ANOVA.
Figure 2Effects of commonly used Chinese herbal extracts on ESR1-luciferase activity using the MCF-7 cell line. The MCF-7 line (1 × 105 cells/well) was seeded for 24 h, followed by transfection with the ESR1-luciferase plasmid and treated with twenty-two single herbal extracts (a) and six compound recipes (b) as described in Section 2. The codes of twenty-two herbs (from A to V) are described in Section 2. Data are presented as the relative optic density ratio, namely, the ratio of luciferase activity to Renilla luciferase ratio and were analyzed using four to six independent experiments. An asterisk indicates a P value < 0.05 versus the vehicle group by one-way ANOVA.
Effects of Qi-supplying and Blood-regulating herbs on ERBB2 and ESR1 gene expression.
| Nature | Scientific names | Code | Dose range ( |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≦1.5 | 1.5–2 | ≧2 | ≦1.5 | 1.5–2 | ≧2 | ||||
| Qi-supplying |
| A | 0.3, 1, 3 | ||||||
|
| B | 1, 3, 10 | 1* | ||||||
|
| C | 0.3, 1, 3 | 0.3 | 1, 3 | |||||
|
| D | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | 0.1 | 0.3, 1 | |||||
|
| E | 0.3, 1, 3 | 0.3, 1, 3 | ||||||
|
| F | 1, 3, 10 | 3, 10 | ||||||
|
| G | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Blood-regulating |
| H | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | 1 | |||||
|
| I | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | 1 | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | |||||
|
| J | 0.3, 1, 3 | |||||||
|
| K | 0.3, 1, 3 | |||||||
|
| L | 0.3, 1, 3 | 3 | 1, 3 | |||||
ERBB2 and ESR1 gene expression was determined by luciferase reporter assay as described in the Methods section.
*Number indicates the dose that has effect with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) versus vehicle group (n ≥ 6).
Effects of Heat-clearing and Yin-nourishing herbs on ERBB2 and ESR1 gene expression.
| Nature | Scientific Names | Code | Dose range ( |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≦1.5 | 1.5–2 | ≧2 | ≦1.5 | 1.5–2 | ≧2 | ||||
| Heat-clearing |
| M | 0.3, 1, 3 | ||||||
|
| N | 1, 3, 10 | |||||||
|
| O | 1, 3, 10 | 3*, 10 | ||||||
|
| P | 0.3, 1, 3 | 1 | ||||||
|
| Q | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | 1 | ||||||
|
| R | 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 | |||||||
|
| S | 0.3, 1, 3 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Yin-nourishing |
| T | 0.3, 1, 3 | ||||||
|
| U | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | |||||||
|
| V | 0.3, 1, 3 | 0.3, 1, 3 | ||||||
ERBB2 and ESR1 gene expression was determined by luciferase reporter assay as described in the Methods section.
*Number indicates the dose that has effect with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) versus vehicle group (n ≥ 6).
Effects of Chinese compound recipes on ERBB2 and ESR1 gene expression.
| Names | Abbreviation | Dose range ( | ERBB2 (fold of control) | ESR1 (fold of control) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≦1.5 | 1.5–2 | ≧2 | ≦1.5 | 1.5–2 | ≧2 | |||
| Si-Wu-Tang | SWT | 1, 3, 10 | 10* | 1, 3, 10 | ||||
| Jia-Wei-Xiao-Yao-San | JWXYS | 1, 3, 10 | ||||||
| Suan-Zsao-Ren-Tang | SZRT | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | ||||
| Reduced formula of Suan-Zsao-Ren-Tang# | r-SZRT | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | 0.3 | 0.1, 1 | ||||
| Kuan-Shin-Yin | KHY | 0.3, 1, 3 | 0.3, 1, 3 | |||||
| VGH-S4 | VGH-S4 | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | 0.3, 1 | 0.1, 0.3, 1 | ||||
ERBB2 and ESR1 gene expression was determined by luciferase reporter assay as described in the Methods section. VGH-S4 is a compound recipe commonly used in Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
#Reduced formula of Suan-Zsao-Ren-Tang (r-SZRT) is composed of those materials in Suan-Zsao-Ren-Tang except for Ligusticum chuanxiong which is absent.
*Number indicates the dose that has effect with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) versus vehicle group (n ≥ 6).
Figure 3Effects of Chinese herbal extracts on HER2 and ERα protein expression using the MCF-7 cell line. The MCF-7 line (1 × 106 cells) was seeded for 24 h and changed to 1% CDFBS medium for 4 days and then treated with each Chinese herbal extract individually for another 24 h. Then the cells were treated with lysing buffer and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-HER2 antibodies (a) and anti-ERα antibody (b) as described in Section 2. The OD ratio indicates the relative optic density ratio using β-actin as the control.
Figure 4Effects of Ligusticum chuanxiong extract on ERα and HER2 protein expression using the MCF-7 cell line. The MCF-7 line (1 × 106 cells) was seeded for 24 h and changed to 1% CDFBS medium for 4 days and then treated with Suan-Zao-Ren-Tang (SZRT), the reduced form of Suan-Zao-Ren-Tang (r-SZRT) or Ligusticum chuanxiong extracts, for another 24 hr. Then the cells were treated with lysing buffer and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-HER2 antibodies (a) and anti-ERα antibody (b) as described in the Methods section. The OD ratio indicates the relative optic density ratio using β-actin as the control.
Figure 5Effects of combined treatment with Ligusticum chuanxiong and estrogen (E2) on the cell proliferation of MCF-7 cells. The MCF-7 line (1 × 106 cells) was seeded for 24 h and changed to 1% CDFBS medium for 4 days and then treated with Ligusticum chuanxiong extract (1 μg/mL) with or without exogenous estrogen E2 (10−9 ~10−7 M). This was followed by counting the cell numbers using the trypan blue exclusion method. Data are presented as folds relative to the control and were analyzed using six independent experiments. An asterisk indicates a P value < 0.05 versus vehicle group.