| Literature DB >> 24987302 |
Xiao-Yu Zhang1, Xiao-Xia Yu1, Zhuo Yu1, Yu-Feng Xue1, Li-Peng Qi1.
Abstract
A two-step method was developed to evaluate potato resistance to black scurf caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Tuber piece inoculum was first conducted in the laboratory, which was also first reported in this study. After inoculation with pathogen discs and culture for 48 h, the necrotic spots on the inoculated potato pieces were generated and measured by the crossing method. Further evaluation was conducted through field experiments using a wheat bran inoculum method. The wheat bran inoculum was placed into the pit dispersedly and surrounded seed tubers. Each cultivar or line was subjected to five treatments of 0-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-g soil inoculum. The results showed that 2-4 g of wheat bran inoculum was the optimum for identifying tuber black scurf resistance. The laboratory scores positively correlated with the incidence and severity of black scurf in the field. According to the results in the laboratory, relatively resistant cultivars could be selected for further estimation of tuber black scurf resistance in field experiments. It is a practical and effective screening method for rapid identification of resistant potato germplasm, which can reduce workload in the field, shorten time required for identification.Entities:
Keywords: Rhizoctonia solani; black scurf; potato; tuber piece inoculum; two-step method; wheat bran inoculum
Year: 2014 PMID: 24987302 PMCID: PMC4065323 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.64.156
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Lesion area on potato pieces inoculated with R. solani at 48 h
| Cultivars/lines | Lesion area in 2009 (cm2) | Lesion area in 2010 (cm2) | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Average | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Average | ||
| Desiree | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0.81 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.53 |
| LK99 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.55 | 1.44 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 1.21 | 0.81 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.68 |
| Zihuabai | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 1.1 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.72 |
| Kexin 1 | 1.1 | 1.69 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.81 | 1.44 | 1.32 | 0.9 | 1.10 | 0.81 | 0.9 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 0.72 | 0.9 | 0.81 | 0.9 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.70 | 0.9 |
| Qingshu 168 | 0.9 | 0.81 | 0.9 | 1 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.81 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.90 | 1 | 0.9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.9 | 1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.95 |
| J08-4 | 1.21 | 1.32 | 0.81 | 1.21 | 1.1 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 1.1 | 0.81 | 1 | 1.01 | 1.82 | 2.1 | 1.96 | 1.56 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.32 | 1.69 | 1.32 | 1.44 | 1.61 | 1.31 |
| Longshu 7 | 1.21 | 1.1 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.44 | 1.32 | 1.1 | 1.32 | 1.1 | 1.30 | 1.82 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.96 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 1.70 | 1.5 |
| Longshu 3 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.44 | 1.21 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.48 | 1.56 | 1.69 | 1.56 | 1.69 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.82 | 1.69 | 1.60 | 1.54 |
| Heimeiren | 1.56 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.50 | 1.69 | 2.1 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.82 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.56 | 1.82 | 1.68 | 1.59 |
| Longshu 6 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 0.56 | 1.69 | 0.56 | 0.81 | 0.49 | 0.81 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.06 | 2.56 | 2.4 | 1.69 | 1.96 | 1.82 | 2.56 | 2.56 | 2.4 | 2.72 | 1.96 | 2.26 | 1.66 |
| J08-1 | 1.69 | 3.42 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 1.96 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 1.69 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 2.25 | 1.69 | 1 | 1.69 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.21 | 1.69 | 0.81 | 0.56 | 0.81 | 1.25 | 1.75 |
| Favorita | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.56 | 1.44 | 1.69 | 1.21 | 1.44 | 1.69 | 1.63 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 2.89 | 1.96 | 1.82 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 2.1 | 1.96 | 2.05 | 1.84 |
| J07-5 | 1.82 | 1.69 | 1.82 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.82 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.69 | 1.81 | 1.96 | 1.82 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.82 | 2.1 | 1.96 | 1.82 | 1.93 | 1.87 |
| J07-6 | 1.96 | 1.21 | 0.81 | 0.56 | 1.69 | 1.21 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 1.21 | 1.03 | 2.72 | 1.96 | 2.56 | 4.41 | 2.25 | 3.06 | 2.1 | 2.89 | 4.41 | 1.96 | 2.83 | 1.93 |
| Shuixihong | 1.96 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.96 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.69 | 1.82 | 1.98 | 1.96 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.96 | 2.1 | 1.96 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.96 | 2.1 | 2.10 | 2.04 |
| Atlantic | 1.96 | 2.1 | 2.25 | 3.24 | 2.56 | 2.25 | 3.24 | 2.1 | 3.61 | 2.4 | 2.57 | 2.25 | 1.21 | 1.32 | 2.1 | 0.81 | 1.96 | 2.4 | 1.96 | 0.64 | 1 | 1.57 | 2.07 |
| Shepody | 2.25 | 1.96 | 2.1 | 1.69 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.56 | 2.4 | 1.44 | 2.1 | 2.00 | 3.24 | 3.06 | 4 | 2.89 | 2.56 | 2.89 | 2.56 | 3.61 | 2.88 | 3.06 | 3.08 | 2.54 |
| Sepihong | 2.89 | 3.06 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 3.23 | 3.06 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 3.06 | 3.20 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 3.42 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 3.42 | 3.24 | 3.42 | 3.06 | 3.06 | 3.26 | 3.23 |
| J07-7 | 3.61 | 3.8 | 3.06 | 3.61 | 3.61 | 3.42 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 3.06 | 3.06 | 3.37 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.61 | 3.61 | 3.06 | 3.06 | 3.51 | 3.44 |
| J07-2 | 3.6 | 3.23 | 3.23 | 3.42 | 3.23 | 3.06 | 3.23 | 2.72 | 3.06 | 3.06 | 3.18 | 6 | 6 | 5.06 | 4 | 4.84 | 4.2 | 4.41 | 4.2 | 4.84 | 4.2 | 4.78 | 3.98 |
Correlation coefficient between average lesion area of different potato cultivars or lines inoculated with R. solani and the average disease index of tubers in field in 2 years, r = −0.455*. * indicates significant correlation; **indicates extremely significant correlation.
Evaluation of 20 potato cultivars or lines for tuber black scurf resistance with different soil-borne inoculum levels in 2009
| Cultivars/lines | Inoculum 0 g | Inoculum 2 g | Inoculum 3 g | Inoculum 4 g | Inoculum 5 g | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| DI | DI | RRI | Resistance evaluation | DI | RRI | Resistance evaluation | DI | RRI | Resistance evaluation | DI | RRI | Resistance evaluation | |
| Desiree | 2.8 | 17.18 | 0.82 | HR | 29.52 | 0.66 | MR | 16.57 | 0.83 | HR | 30.29 | 0.69 | MR |
| LK99 | 8.67 | 35.8 | 0.63 | MR | 67.5 | 0.22 | HS | 44.74 | 0.55 | MS | 53.94 | 0.44 | MS |
| Zihuabai | 9.76 | 55.98 | 0.42 | MS | 48.45 | 0.44 | MS | 36.79 | 0.63 | MR | 56 | 0.42 | MS |
| Kexin 1 | 6.5 | 49.27 | 0.49 | MS | 40.49 | 0.53 | MS | 48.89 | 0.51 | MS | 68 | 0.3 | HS |
| Qingshu 168 | 2.25 | 38.55 | 0.6 | MR | 34.23 | 0.61 | MR | 48.89 | 0.51 | MS | 49.7 | 0.49 | MS |
| J08-4 | 1.91 | 50.75 | 0.48 | MS | 44.81 | 0.49 | MS | 58.85 | 0.41 | MS | 67.5 | 0.3 | HS |
| Longshu 7 | 3.98 | 52.26 | 0.46 | MS | 48.44 | 0.44 | MS | 60.06 | 0.4 | MS | 51.5 | 0.47 | MS |
| Longshu 3 | 9.15 | 41.6 | 0.57 | MS | 45.12 | 0.48 | MS | 49.34 | 0.51 | MS | 62.19 | 0.36 | HS |
| Heimeiren | 0 | 22.53 | 0.77 | MR | 31.08 | 0.64 | MR | 36.27 | 0.64 | MR | 50.29 | 0.48 | MS |
| Longshu 6 | 3.15 | 42.35 | 0.56 | MS | 36.13 | 0.58 | MS | 33.71 | 0.66 | MR | 66.67 | 0.31 | HS |
| J08-1 | 0 | 50 | 0.48 | MS | 58.1 | 0.33 | HS | 35.83 | 0.64 | MR | 22 | 0.77 | MR |
| Favorita | 5.3 | 61.33 | 0.37 | HS | 66.82 | 0.23 | HS | 57.14 | 0.43 | MS | 68.6 | 0.29 | HS |
| J07-5 | 0.27 | 45.2 | 0.53 | MS | 45.55 | 0.48 | MS | 68.22 | 0.32 | HS | 75.48 | 0.22 | HS |
| J07-6 | 0 | 44.89 | 0.54 | MS | 44.29 | 0.49 | MS | 52.43 | 0.48 | MS | 70.59 | 0.27 | HS |
| Shuixihong | 3.13 | 33.82 | 0.65 | MR | 29.93 | 0.66 | MR | 39.17 | 0.61 | MR | 52 | 0.46 | MS |
| Atlantic | 4.95 | 54.68 | 0.43 | MS | 61.67 | 0.29 | HS | 68.59 | 0.31 | HS | 75 | 0.22 | HS |
| Shepody | 14 | 69.37 | 0.28 | HS | 66.67 | 0.23 | HS | 60 | 0.4 | MS | 81.43 | 0.16 | HS |
| Sepihong | 1.05 | 35.9 | 0.63 | MR | 50.14 | 0.42 | MS | 45.91 | 0.54 | MS | 59 | 0.39 | HS |
| J07-7 | 0 | 62.22 | 0.36 | HS | 43.67 | 0.5 | MS | 56.88 | 0.43 | MS | 64.76 | 0.33 | HS |
| J07-2 | 1.34 | 64 | 0.34 | HS | 47.62 | 0.45 | MS | 67.14 | 0.33 | HS | 76.84 | 0.21 | HS |
the “HR” was highly resistant.
the “MR” was moderately resistant.
the “MS” was moderately susceptible.
and the “HS” highly susceptible.
Variance analysis of disease indices of potato cultivars or lines at different inoculum levels in 2009
| Inoculum (g) | F-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 12.49 | 0.01 |
| 3 | 7.95 | 0.01 |
| 4 | 6.70 | 0.01 |
| 5 | 10.82 | 0.01 |
Variance analysis of average disease index for inoculum levels of 2, 3, and 4 g in 2009 and disease index in 2010
| Source of variance | SS | df | MS | F-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivars/lines | 9184.84 | 19 | 340.18 | 4.72 | 0.01 |
| Years | 1182.66 | 1 | 1182.66 | 16.41 | 0.01 |
| Error | 1945.54 | 19 | 72.06 | ||
| Total variance | 12313.04 | 39 |
The correlation coefficient between the average disease index of potato tubers with inoculum levels of 2, 3, and 4 g in 2009 and disease index in 2010 was r = 0.661**.
Resistance evaluation for tuber black scurf in the field in 2009 and 2010
| Cultivars/lines | 2009 | 2010 | Average DI | Average RRI | Comprehensive resistance evaluation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| DI | RRI | Resistance evaluation | DI | RRI | Resistance evaluation | ||||
| Desiree | 21.09 | 0.77 | MR | 29.25 | 0.61 | MR | 25.17 | 25.17 | MR |
| LK99 | 49.35 | 0.47 | MS | 37.64 | 0.5 | MS | 43.49 | 43.49 | MS |
| Zihuabai | 47.07 | 0.5 | MS | 37.5 | 0.5 | MS | 42.29 | 42.29 | MS |
| Kexin 1 | 46.22 | 0.51 | MS | 34 | 0.55 | MS | 40.11 | 40.11 | MS |
| Qingshu 168 | 40.56 | 0.57 | MS | 43.95 | 0.41 | MS | 42.25 | 42.25 | MS |
| J08-4 | 51.47 | 0.46 | MS | 57.75 | 0.23 | HS | 54.61 | 54.61 | MS-HS |
| Longshu 7 | 53.59 | 0.43 | MS | 41.43 | 0.45 | MS | 47.51 | 47.51 | MS |
| Longshu 3 | 45.35 | 0.52 | MS | 39 | 0.48 | MS | 42.18 | 42.18 | MS |
| Heimeiren | 29.96 | 0.68 | MR | 37.07 | 0.51 | MS | 33.52 | 33.52 | MR-MS |
| Longshu 6 | 37.40 | 0.6 | MR | 29.07 | 0.61 | MR | 33.23 | 33.23 | MR |
| J08-1 | 47.98 | 0.49 | MS | 22.43 | 0.7 | MR | 35.20 | 35.2 | MS-MR |
| Favorita | 61.76 | 0.34 | HS | 44.61 | 0.41 | MS | 53.19 | 53.19 | HS-MS |
| J07-5 | 52.99 | 0.44 | MS | 45.51 | 0.39 | HS | 49.25 | 49.25 | MS-HS |
| J07-6 | 47.20 | 0.5 | MS | 15.56 | 0.79 | MR | 31.38 | 31.38 | MS-MR |
| Shuixihong | 34.31 | 0.64 | MR | 54.76 | 0.27 | HS | 44.53 | 44.53 | MR-HS |
| Atlantic | 61.65 | 0.35 | HS | 52.74 | 0.3 | HS | 57.19 | 57.19 | HS |
| Shepody | 65.35 | 0.31 | HS | 46.5 | 0.38 | HS | 55.92 | 55.92 | HS |
| Sepihong | 43.98 | 0.53 | MS | 34.94 | 0.53 | MS | 39.46 | 39.46 | MS |
| J07-7 | 54.26 | 0.43 | MS | 47.08 | 0.37 | HS | 50.67 | 50.67 | MS-HS |
| J07-2 | 59.59 | 0.37 | HS | 52.98 | 0.29 | HS | 56.28 | 56.28 | HS |
Average disease index of potato cultivars at 2-, 3-, and 4-g inoculum levels in 2009.
Average relative resistance index of potato cultivars at 2-, 3-, and 4-g inoculum levels in 2009.
Comprehensive resistance evaluation based on 2-, 3-, and 4-g inoculum levels in 2009.
Results of resistance evaluation based on the evaluations in 2009 and 2010.