| Literature DB >> 24987088 |
Elizabeth Choe, Robert A Kazmierczak, Abraham Eisenstark1.
Abstract
Salmonella has been of interest in cancer research due to its intrinsic ability to selectively target and colonize within tumors, leading to tumor cell death. Current research indicates promising use of Salmonella in regular administrations to remove tumors in mouse models while minimizing toxic side effects. However, selection of mutants during such long-term tumor colonization is a safety concern, and understanding selection of certain phenotypes within a tumor is an important consideration in predicting the long-term success of bacterium-based cancer treatment strategies. Thus, we have made an initial examination of selected phenotypes in a therapeutic Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium population developed from an archival wild-type LT2 strain and intraperitoneally injected into a 6-month-old TRAMP (transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate) mouse. We compared the original injected strain to isolates recovered from prostate tumors and those recovered from the spleen and liver of non-tumor-bearing TRAMP mice through phenotypic assessments of bacteriophage susceptibility, motility, growth rates, morphology, and metabolic activity. Tumor isolate traits, particularly the loss of wild-type motility and flagella, reflect the selective pressure of the tumor, while the maintenance of bacteriophage resistance indicates no active selection to remove this robust trait. We posit that the Salmonella population adopts certain strategies to minimize energy consumption and maximize survival and proliferation once within the tumor. We find these insights to be nonnegligible considerations in the development of cancer therapies involving bacteria and suggest further examinations into the evolution of therapeutic strains during passage through tumors. Importance: Salmonella is of interest in cancer research due to its intrinsic abilities to selectively target, colonize, and replicate within tumors, leading to tumor cell death. However, mutation of strains during long-term colonization within tumors is a safety concern, and understanding their evolution within a tumor is an important consideration in predicting the long-term success of bacterium-based cancer treatment strategies. Thus, we have made an initial examination of phenotypically diverse Salmonella colonies recovered from a therapeutic Salmonella strain that we developed and injected into prostate tumor-bearing mice. We compared the bacteriophage susceptibility, motility, growth rates, morphology, and metabolic activity of the original therapeutic strain to those of strains recovered from prostate tumors of tumor-bearing mice and the liver and spleen of non-tumor-bearing mice. Our results suggest that the Salmonella population adopts certain strategies to minimize energy consumption and maximize survival and proliferation once within the tumor, leading to phenotypic changes in the strain.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24987088 PMCID: PMC4161240 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01182-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MBio Impact factor: 7.867
S. Typhimurium strains and phage isolates used in this study[]
| CRC stock no. | Strain or phage information and history | Ampicillin resistance |
|---|---|---|
| LT2 | Wild-type | No |
| 1674 | Derived from LT2 strain; | No |
| 2631 | Original therapeutic | No |
| 2636 | CRC2631 that contains pRSET-mCherry plasmid ( | Yes |
| 2652 | Yes | |
| 2653 | Yes | |
| 2654 | No | |
| 2835 | Yes | |
| 2836 | Yes | |
| 2837 | Yes | |
| 2838 | Yes | |
| 2754 | Phage-free | No |
| ES18 | ||
| O-1 | ||
| P22 | ||
| P162 | Lilleengen bacteriophage (lyophilized); STM-30; characterized in | |
| P165 | Lilleengen bacteriophage (lyophilized); STM-31; characterized in | |
| P282 | Fels-1, Gifsy-2 supernatant collected by CRC in 2006 | |
| P283 | Fels-2, Gifsy-2 supernatant collected by CRC in 2009 |
Isolates 2652 to 2653 were recovered from the same mouse; isolates 2835 to 2838 also were recovered from the same mouse.
Bacteriophage susceptibility of strains
| Isolate source | CRC stock no. | Reaction of strain[ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ES-18 | O-1 | P22 | P162 | P165 | P282 | P283 | ||
| LT2 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| 1674 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| 2636 | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| Prostate tumor | 2652 | + | − | − | − | − | − | P |
| 2653 | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| 2654 | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| Liver isolate (nontumor) | 2835 | + | − | − | − | − | P | P |
| 2836 | + | − | − | − | − | P | P | |
| Spleen isolate (nontumor) | 2837 | + | − | − | − | − | P | P |
| 2838 | + | − | − | − | − | P | P | |
+, complete clearing; −, no lysis; P, partial or faint lysis; n = 3 trials.
FIG 1 Assessment of strain growth rate averages via optical density or viable plate count versus incubation time. Overnight cultures were diluted to an OD of 0.05 for initial spectrophotometer readings. Optical density readings were performed every hour for 7 h, and culture dilutions followed by viable plate counting were performed every other hour for 7 h. Growth curves for strains are colored as follows: parental strains (LT2 and CRC1674), green; injection strain (CRC2636), blue; tumor-recovered strains (CRC2652, CRC2653, and CRC2654), red; strains recovered from liver or spleen (CRC2835, CRC2836, CRC2837, and CRC2838), black.
Average swarming diameter of strains on motility agar
| Isolate source | CRC stock no. | Diam score at time[ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | ||
| LT2 | 7 | 33 | + | |
| 1674 | 7 | + | + | |
| 2636 | 2 | 32 | + | |
| Prostate tumor | 2652 | 2 | 19 | 33 |
| 2653 | 2 | 10 | 23 | |
| 2654 | 1 | 12 | 23 | |
| Liver isolate (nontumor) | 2835 | 5 | + | + |
| 2836 | 4 | 33 | + | |
| Spleen isolate (nontumor) | 2837 | 4 | 32 | + |
| 2838 | 4 | 33 | + | |
Swarming diameters were assigned a score designating a factor by which the smallest diameter measurement taken at 24 h (strain 2654) needed to be multiplied to reach the average swarming diameter of the given strain (n = 3). + designates overgrowth of the agar plate (a score of 34), after which measurements could not be taken.
FIG 2 Salmonella isolate morphology. Isolates were recovered from the following environments: liquid culture (a to c), tumor (d to f), liver (g and h), and spleen (i and j). Strains were viewed using transmission electron microscopy under negative staining with 4% uranyl acetate on carbon-coated copper grids and included LT2 (bar, 1 µm) (a), CRC1674 (bar, 0.5 µm) (b), CRC2636 (bar, 0.5 µm) (c), CRC2652 (bar, 1 µm) (d), CRC2653 (bar, 0.5 µm) (e), CRC2654 (bar, 0.5 µm) (f), CRC2835 (bar, 1 µm) (g), CRC2836 (bar, 2 µm) (h), CRC2837 (bar, 1 µm) (i), and CRC2838 (bar, 1 µm) (j).
Variation in carbon-containing substrate utilization by isolates
| Typing | Substrate | Utilization by strain[ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2636 | 2652 (tumor isolate) | 2653 (tumor isolate) | 2654 (tumor isolate) | 2835 (liver isolate) | 2837 (spleen isolate) | ||
| Sucrose | + | + | − | − | + | + | |
| Adonitol | − | + | − | + | − | − | |
| Glycolic acid | + | + | + | + | − | − | |
| Glyoxylic acid | + | + | + | + | − | − | |
| Phenylethyl amine | + | + | − | − | − | − | |
| Citric acid | + | + | + | + | − | − | |
| − | − | − | − | + | + | ||
| − | + | − | − | + | + | ||
| 1,2-Propanediol | − | + | + | + | − | − | |
| + | + | − | − | − | − | ||
| Tricarballylic acid | + | + | − | − | + | + | |
| Tyramine | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| None | Formic acid | + | + | − | − | + | + |
| Acetic acid | + | + | − | + | − | − | |
| Acetoacetic acid | + | − | + | − | − | − | |
| Methyl pyruvate | + | + | + | + | − | − | |
| 2-Amino ethanol | + | + | − | − | + | + | |
Data were not collected for LT2, 1674, 2836, and 2838.