Literature DB >> 24986942

The stability of the femoral component in the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a comparison of single and twin peg designs.

T Reiner1, S Jaeger2, M Schwarze1, M C Klotz1, N A Beckmann1, R G Bitsch1.   

Abstract

Aseptic loosening of the femoral component is an important indication for revision surgery in unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). A new design of femoral component with an additional peg was introduced for the cemented Oxford UKR to increase its stability. The purpose of this study was to compare the primary stability of the two designs of component. Medial Oxford UKR was performed in 12 pairs of human cadaver knees. In each pair, one knee received the single peg and one received the twin peg design. Three dimensional micromotion and subsidence of the component in relation to the bone was measured under cyclical loading at flexion of 40° and 70° using an optical measuring system. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test was performed to detect differences between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the relative micromotion (p = 0.791 and 0.380, respectively) and subsidence (p = 0.301 and 0.176, respectively) of the component between the two groups at both angles of flexion. Both designs of component offered good strength of fixation in this cadaver study. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical; Implant stability; Twin peg; micromotion; Unicompartmental knee replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986942     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.33478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  3 in total

1.  A matched comparison of revision rates of cemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements with Single and Twin Peg femoral components, based on data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.

Authors:  Hasan R Mohammad; Gulraj S Matharu; Andrew Judge; David W Murray
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions.

Authors:  Johannes Adrian Eckert; Rudi G Bitsch; Robert Sonntag; Tobias Reiner; Martin Schwarze; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 5.853

3.  Early outcomes of twin-peg mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Z C Lum; A V Lombardi; J M Hurst; M J Morris; J B Adams; K R Berend
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.082

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.