Literature DB >> 24986941

Mid term results with the curved modular tapered, fluted titanium Revitan stem in revision hip replacement.

B Fink1, K Urbansky1, P Schuster1.   

Abstract

We report our experience of revision total hip replacement (THR) using the Revitan curved modular titanium fluted revision stem in patients with a full spectrum of proximal femoral defects. A total of 112 patients (116 revisions) with a mean age of 73.4 years (39 to 90) were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 7.5 years (5.3 to 9.1). A total of 12 patients (12 hips) died but their data were included in the survival analysis, and four patients (4 hips) were lost to follow-up. The clinical outcome, proximal bone regeneration and subsidence were assessed for 101 hips. The mean Harris Hip Score was 88.2 (45.8 to 100) after five years and there was an increase of the mean Barnett and Nordin-Score, a measure of the proximal bone regeneration, of 20.8 (-3.1 to 52.7). Five stems had to be revised (4.3%), three (2.9%) showed subsidence, five (4.3%) a dislocation and two of 85 aseptic revisions (2.3%) a periprosthetic infection. At the latest follow-up, the survival with revision of the stem as the endpoint was 95.7% (95% confidence interval 91.9% to 99.4%) and with aseptic loosening as the endpoint, was 100%. Peri-prosthetic fractures were not observed. We report excellent results with respect to subsidence, the risk of fracture, and loosening after femoral revision using a modular curved revision stem with distal cone-in-cone fixation. A successful outcome depends on careful pre-operative planning and the use of a transfemoral approach when the anatomy is distorted or a fracture is imminent, or residual cement or a partially-secured existing stem cannot be removed. The shortest appropriate stem should, in our opinion, be used and secured with > 3 cm fixation at the femoral isthmus, and distal interlocking screws should be used for additional stability when this goal cannot be realised. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cementless; Curved; Hip revision arthroplasty; Modular revision stem; Tapered

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986941     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.33280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  16 in total

Review 1.  Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Umberto Cottino; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  CORR Insights®: Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.

Authors:  Marcus R Streit
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Letter to the Editor: Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Midterm results following uncemented, modular, fully porous coated stem used in revision total hip arthroplasty: Comparison of two stem systems.

Authors:  Konrad Sebastian Wronka; Peter Herman Johan Cnudde
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-02

5.  Mechanical failure of total hip arthroplasties and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Henrik C Bäcker; Chia H Wu; Arne Kienzle; Carsten Perka; Clemens Gwinner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.

Authors:  Nemandra A Sandiford; Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Proximal Femoral Bone Regeneration After an Uncemented Hydroxyapatite-coated Long-stem in Revision Hip Surgery.

Authors:  José Cordero-Ampuero; Eduardo Garcia-Rey; Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-03-30

8.  Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component.

Authors:  Armin Pallaver; Lukas Zwicky; Lilianna Bolliger; Hans Bösebeck; Isabella Manzoni; Sabine Schädelin; Peter E Ochsner; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Eradication of infection, survival, and radiological results of uncemented revision stems in infected total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Philipp Born; Thomas Ilchmann; Werner Zimmerli; Lukas Zwicky; Peter Graber; Peter E Ochsner; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Modular Stems: Advantages and Current Role in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chan-Woo Park; Seung-Jae Lim; Youn-Soo Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2018-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.