Literature DB >> 24986939

Pelvic position and movement during hip replacement.

G Grammatopoulos1, H G Pandit1, R da Assunção2, A Taylor3, P McLardy-Smith3, K A De Smet4, D W Murray1, H S Gill5.   

Abstract

The orientation of the acetabular component is influenced not only by the orientation at which the surgeon implants the component, but also the orientation of the pelvis at the time of implantation. Hence, the orientation of the pelvis at set-up and its movement during the operation, are important. During 67 hip replacements, using a validated photogrammetric technique, we measured how three surgeons orientated the patient's pelvis, how much the pelvis moved during surgery, and what effect these had on the final orientation of the acetabular component. Pelvic orientation at set-up, varied widely (mean (± 2, standard deviation (sd))): tilt 8° (2sd ± 32), obliquity -4° (2sd ± 12), rotation -8° (2sd ± 14). Significant differences in pelvic positioning were detected between surgeons (p < 0.001). The mean angular movement of the pelvis between set-up and component implantation was 9° (sd 6). Factors influencing pelvic movement included surgeon, approach (posterior > lateral), procedure (hip resurfacing > total hip replacement) and type of support (p < 0.001). Although, on average, surgeons achieved their desired acetabular component orientation, there was considerable variability (2sd ± 16) in component orientation. We conclude that inconsistency in positioning the patient at set-up and movement of the pelvis during the operation account for much of the variation in acetabular component orientation. Improved methods of positioning and holding the pelvis are required. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip arthroplasty; Movement; Orientation; Pelvis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986939     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  10 in total

1.  Pelvic tilt compensates for increased acetabular anteversion.

Authors:  Robert K Zahn; Sarah Grotjohann; Heiko Ramm; Stefan Zachow; Michael Putzier; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Validation of use of transverse acetabular ligament and mechanical angle guide device to orient the acetabular cup.

Authors:  Archit Agarwal; Inder Pawar; Sandeep Singh; Deepti Randev; Hem Chandra Sati
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-08-06

3.  Restoring femoral medial offset could reduce pelvic obliquity following primary total hip arthroplasty, an observational study.

Authors:  Alireza Moharrami; Seyed Peyman Mirghaderi; Nima Hoseini-Zare; Mohammad Hasan Kaseb; Seyed Mir Mansour Moazen-Jamshidi; Ahmed Kareem Mansour; Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Current Concepts in Acetabular Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Deepu Bhaskar; Asim Rajpura; Tim Board
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Cup Alignment Change after Screw Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yingyong Suksathien; Urawit Piyapromdee; Thanut Tippimanchai
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Orientation of Transverse Acetabular Ligament With Reference to Anterior Pelvic Plane.

Authors:  Kamal Deep; Anjan Prabhakara; Diwakar Mohan; Vivek Mahajan; Mohamed Sameer
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-12-21

7.  Effects of body mass index and range of motion on intraoperative change in pelvic tilt during total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach.

Authors:  Masanori Okamoto; Masashi Kawasaki; Toshiaki Okura; Taisuke Seki; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  A method combining the use of a mobile application and a dedicated pelvic positioner for acetabular cup insertion.

Authors:  Atsushi Kamimura; Makoto Enokida; Shinpei Enokida; Hideki Nagashima
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.677

Review 9.  Cup placement in primary total hip arthroplasty: how to get it right without navigation or robotics.

Authors:  Geert Meermans; George Grammatopoulos; Moritz Innmann; David Beverland
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-05-31

10.  Risk factors for pressure ulcers from the use of a pelvic positioner in hip surgery: a retrospective observational cohort study in 229 patients.

Authors:  Takuro Ueno; Tamon Kabata; Yoshitomo Kajino; Daisuke Inoue; Takaaki Ohmori; Junya Yoshitani; Ken Ueoka; Yuki Yamamuro; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2020-04-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.