Literature DB >> 24986938

A comparative assessment of small-head metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip replacement.

A Lübbeke1, A Gonzalez1, G Garavaglia1, C Roussos1, A Bonvin1, R Stern1, R Peter1, P Hoffmeyer1.   

Abstract

Large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THR) have given rise to concern. Comparative studies of small-head MoM THRs over a longer follow-up period are lacking. Our objective was to compare the incidence of complications such as infection, dislocation, revision, adverse local tissue reactions, mortality and radiological and clinical outcomes in small-head (28 mm) MoM and ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) THRs up to 12 years post-operatively. A prospective cohort study included 3341 THRs in 2714 patients. The mean age was 69.1 years (range 24 to 98) and 1848 (55.3%) were performed in women, with a mean follow-up of 115 months (18 to 201). There were 883 MoM and 2458 CoP bearings. Crude incidence rates (cases/1000 person-years) were: infection 1.3 vs 0.8; dislocation 3.3 vs 3.1 and all-cause revision 4.3 vs 2.2, respectively. There was a significantly higher revision rate after ten years (adjusted hazard ratio 9.4; 95% CI 2.6 to 33.6) in the MoM group, and ten of 26 patients presented with an adverse local tissue reaction at revision. No differences in mortality, osteolysis or clinical outcome were seen. In conclusion, we found similar results for small-head MoM and CoP bearings up to ten years post-operatively, but after ten years MoM THRs had a higher risk of all-cause revision. Furthermore, the presence of an adverse response to metal debris seen in the small-head MOM group at revision is a cause for concern. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  28 mm head; Adverse local tissure reaction; Infection; Metal-on-metal; Osteolysis; Revision; Total hip replacement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986938     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  6 in total

1.  The role of national registries in improving patient safety for hip and knee replacements.

Authors:  Anne Lübbeke; Alan J Silman; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Amanda I Adler; Christophe Barea; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Preoperative Planning for Total Hip Arthroplasty for Neglected Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Shi; Chao-Feng Li; Cheng-Ming Cheng; Chun-Yang Feng; Shu-Xuan Li; Jian-Guo Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.071

3.  Pseudotumours, cobalt and clinical outcome in small head metal-on-metal versus conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hugo C van der Veen; Inge Hf Reininga; Wierd P Zijlstra; Martijn F Boomsma; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jos Jam van Raay
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Eric Bohm; Patricia Franklin; Stephen Lyman; Geke Denissen; Jill Dawson; Jennifer Dunn; Kate Eresian Chenok; Michael Dunbar; Søren Overgaard; Göran Garellick; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 5.  Increased Mortality in Metal-on-Metal versus Non-Metal-on-Metal Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty at 10 Years and Longer Follow-Up: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  B G Pijls; J M T A Meessen; J W Schoones; M Fiocco; H J L van der Heide; A Sedrakyan; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Are PEEK-on-Ceramic Bearings an Option for Total Disc Arthroplasty? An In Vitro Tribology Study.

Authors:  Ryan Siskey; Lauren Ciccarelli; Melissa K C Lui; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.