Literature DB >> 24986650

Twelve tips for completing quality in-training evaluation reports.

Nancy Dudek1, Suzan Dojeiji.   

Abstract

Assessing learners in the clinical setting is vital to determining their level of professional competence. Clinical performance assessments can be documented using In-training evaluation reports (ITERs). Previous research has suggested a need for faculty development in order to improve the quality of these reports. Previous work identified key features of high-quality completed ITERs which primarily involve the narrative comments. This aligns well with the recent discourse in the assessment literature focusing on the value of qualitative assessments. Evidence exists to demonstrate that faculty can be trained to complete higher quality ITERs. We present 12 key strategies to assist clinical supervisors in improving the quality of their completed ITERs. Higher quality completed ITERs will improve the documentation of the trainee's progress and be more defensible when questioned in an appeal or legal process.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986650     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.932897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  7 in total

1.  Thresholds of Principle and Preference: Exploring Procedural Variation in Postgraduate Surgical Education.

Authors:  Tavis Apramian; Sayra Cristancho; Chris Watling; Michael Ott; Lorelei Lingard
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 2.  A Call for an Integrated Program of Assessment.

Authors:  David W Fielding; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Assessing Interpersonal and Communication Skills.

Authors:  Liana Puscas; Jennifer R Kogan; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-23

4.  Summative assessment in a doctor of pharmacy program: a critical insight.

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-02-17

Review 5.  Descriptors for unprofessional behaviours of medical students: a systematic review and categorisation.

Authors:  Marianne Mak-van der Vossen; Walther van Mook; Stéphanie van der Burgt; Joyce Kors; Johannes C F Ket; Gerda Croiset; Rashmi Kusurkar
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  How does culture affect experiential training feedback in exported Canadian health professional curricula?

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur; Rasha Mousa Bacha; Somaia Abdelaziz
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2017-03-17

7.  Does faculty development influence the quality of in-training evaluation reports in pharmacy?

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.