Literature DB >> 24984612

Reproducibility of area at risk assessment in acute myocardial infarction by T1- and T2-mapping sequences in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in comparison to Tc99m-sestamibi SPECT.

Birgit Langhans1, Jonathan Nadjiri, Christin Jähnichen, Adnan Kastrati, Stefan Martinoff, Martin Hadamitzky.   

Abstract

Area at risk (AAR) is an important parameter for the assessment of the salvage area after revascularization in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). By combining AAR assessment by T2-weighted imaging and scar quantification by late gadolinium enhancement imaging cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers a promising alternative to the "classical" modality of Tc99m-sestamibi single photon emission tomography (SPECT). Current T2 weighted sequences for edema imaging in CMR are limited by low contrast to noise ratios and motion artifacts. During the last years novel CMR imaging techniques for quantification of acute myocardial injury, particularly the T1-mapping and T2-mapping, have attracted rising attention. But no direct comparison between the different sequences in the setting of AMI or a validation against SPECT has been reported so far. We analyzed 14 patients undergoing primary coronary revascularization in AMI in whom both a pre-intervention Tc99m-sestamibi-SPECT and CMR imaging at a median of 3.4 (interquartile range 3.3-3.6) days after the acute event were performed. Size of AAR was measured by three different non-contrast CMR techniques on corresponding short axis slices: T2-weighted, fat-suppressed turbospin echo sequence (TSE), T2-mapping from T2-prepared balanced steady state free precession sequences (T2-MAP) and T1-mapping from modified look locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequences. For each CMR sequence, the AAR was quantified by appropriate methods (absolute values for mapping sequences, comparison with remote myocardium for other sequences) and correlated with Tc99m-sestamibi-SPECT. All measurements were performed on a 1.5 Tesla scanner. The size of the AAR assessed by CMR was 28.7 ± 20.9 % of left ventricular myocardial volume (%LV) for TSE, 45.8 ± 16.6 %LV for T2-MAP, and 40.1 ± 14.4 %LV for MOLLI. AAR assessed by SPECT measured 41.6 ± 20.7 %LV. Correlation analysis revealed best correlation with SPECT for T2-MAP at a T2-threshold of 60 ms (ms) (slope = 0.99, Pearson's r = 0.94), and for MOLLI at T1-threshold of 1,075 ms (slope 0.86, r = 0.91, Pearson's r = 0.45). For the assessment of AAR in AMI, the novel T2-mapping technique correlates best with SPECT size, T1-mapping with MOLLI and standard T2-weighted imaging showed similar good correlations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24984612     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0467-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  26 in total

1.  The assessment of area at risk and myocardial salvage after coronary revascularization in acute myocardial infarction: comparison between CMR and SPECT.

Authors:  Martin Hadamitzky; Birgit Langhans; Jörg Hausleiter; Carolin Sonne; Adnan Kastrati; Stefan Martinoff; Albert Schömig; Tareq Ibrahim
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-03

2.  The histopathologic evolution of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M C Fishbein; D Maclean; P R Maroko
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Ischemic preconditioning attenuates apoptosis through protein kinase C in rat hearts.

Authors:  T Okamura; T Miura; H Iwamoto; K Shirakawa; S Kawamura; Y Ikeda; M Iwatate; M Matsuzaki
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1999-11

4.  Feasibility of tomographic 99mTc-hexakis-2-methoxy-2-methylpropyl-isonitrile imaging for the assessment of myocardial area at risk and the effect of treatment in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R J Gibbons; M S Verani; T Behrenbeck; P A Pellikka; M K O'Connor; J J Mahmarian; J H Chesebro; F J Wackers
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Intracoronary application of C1 esterase inhibitor improves cardiac function and reduces myocardial necrosis in an experimental model of ischemia and reperfusion.

Authors:  G Horstick; A Heimann; O Götze; G Hafner; O Berg; P Böhmer; P Becker; H Darius; H J Rupprecht; M Loos; S Bhakdi; J Meyer; O Kempski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-02-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  T2-prepared SSFP improves diagnostic confidence in edema imaging in acute myocardial infarction compared to turbo spin echo.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Anthony H Aletras; Christine Mancini; Elliot R McVeigh; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The salvaged area at risk in reperfused acute myocardial infarction as visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Matthias G Friedrich; Hassan Abdel-Aty; Andrew Taylor; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Daniel Messroghli; Rainer Dietz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Quantitative T2 mapping for detecting myocardial edema after reperfusion of myocardial infarction: validation and comparison with T2-weighted images.

Authors:  Chul Hwan Park; Eui-Young Choi; Hyuck Moon Kwon; Bum Kee Hong; Byoung Kwon Lee; Young Won Yoon; Pil-Ki Min; Andreas Greiser; Mun Young Paek; Wei Yu; Yon Mi Sung; Sung Ho Hwang; Yoo Jin Hong; Tae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in comparison with single-photon emission tomography using Tc99m-Sestamibi.

Authors:  Martin Hadamitzky; Birgit Langhans; Jörg Hausleiter; Carolin Sonne; Robert A Byrne; Julinda Mehilli; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig; Stefan Martinoff; Tareq Ibrahim
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (ShMOLLI) for clinical myocardial T1-mapping at 1.5 and 3 T within a 9 heartbeat breathhold.

Authors:  Stefan K Piechnik; Vanessa M Ferreira; Erica Dall'Armellina; Lowri E Cochlin; Andreas Greiser; Stefan Neubauer; Matthew D Robson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2014 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Could 82Rb-PET be the next best thing in evaluation of myocardial salvage?

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Steven G Lloyd
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  T1 and T2 mapping in the identification of acute myocardial injury in patients with NSTEMI.

Authors:  Carlo Tessa; Jacopo Del Meglio; Alessio Lilli; Stefano Diciotti; Luca Salvatori; Marco Giannelli; Andreas Greiser; Claudio Vignali; Giancarlo Casolo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Cardiac MRI and Ischemic Heart Disease: Role in Diagnosis and Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Rahul N Sawlani; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  An experimental study on use of 7T MRI for evaluation of myocardial infarction in SD rats transfected with pcDNA 3.1(+)/VEGF121 plasmid.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Ruiqing Tian; Xiangchun Shen; Yushu Chen; Wei Chen; Lu Gan; Guiquan Shen; Haiyue Ju; Li Yang; Fabao Gao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Microvascular obstruction in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Elena Guerra; Martin Hadamitzky; Gjin Ndrepepa; Corinna Bauer; Tareq Ibrahim; Ilka Ott; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Heribert Schunkert; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Remote ischemic conditioning.

Authors:  Gerd Heusch; Hans Erik Bøtker; Karin Przyklenk; Andrew Redington; Derek Yellon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Parametric Mapping Techniques: Clinical Applications and Limitations.

Authors:  Eleni Nakou; Rishi K Patel; Marianna Fontana; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Quantifying the Area at Risk in Reperfused ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Using Hybrid Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography-Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Heerajnarain Bulluck; Steven K White; Georg M Fröhlich; Steven G Casson; Celia O'Meara; Ayla Newton; Jennifer Nicholas; Peter Weale; Simon M Y Wan; Alex Sirker; James C Moon; Derek M Yellon; Ashley Groves; Leon Menezes; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 10.  The Road Toward Reproducibility of Parametric Mapping of the Heart: A Technical Review.

Authors:  Augustin C Ogier; Aurelien Bustin; Hubert Cochet; Juerg Schwitter; Ruud B van Heeswijk
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.