Literature DB >> 24984177

Subgroup and per-protocol analyses from the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial.

Nigel Beckett1, Ruth Peters, Gastone Leonetti, Joe Duggan, Robert Fagard, Lut Thijs, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Terry McCormack, Winston Banya, Astrid Fletcher, Christopher Bulpitt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The results of the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial showed positive benefits from blood pressure-lowering treatment in those aged 80 and over.
METHOD: An analysis by the pre-specified subgroups [age, sex, history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and initial SBP] was performed. The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 3845 participants aged 80 and over with SBPs of 160-199 mmHg and diastolic pressures below 110 mmHg recruited from Europe, China, Australasia and Tunisia. Active treatment was indapamide sustained-release 1.5 mg with the addition of perindopril 2-4 mg as required to reach a target blood pressure of less than 150/80 mmHg.
RESULTS: For total mortality, benefits were consistent: men [hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-1.11], women (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.99), those aged 80-84.9 (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96), those aged 85 and over (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.64-1.20), those with a history of CVD (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.48-1.20) and those without (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.65-0.99), and similarly across a range of baseline SBPs. The point estimates for cardiovascular mortality, strokes, heart failure and cardiovascular events were all in favour of benefit. In the per-protocol analysis, strokes were reduced by 34% (P = 0.026), total mortality by 28% (P = 0.001), cardiovascular event by 37% (P < 0.001) and heart failure by 72% (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In hypertensive patients aged 80 or more, treatment based on indapamide (sustained-release) 1.5 mg showed consistent benefits across pre-specified subgroups including those without established CVD (the majority), supporting the need for treatment even at this advanced age. There were too few aged 90 or over to determine benefit from treatment at extreme age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24984177     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Blood pressure targets : The lower the better does not suit all].

Authors:  U Hoffmann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  The effect of indapamide vs. bendroflumethiazide for primary hypertension: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tatiana V Macfarlane; Filippo Pigazzani; Robert W V Flynn; Thomas M MacDonald
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Chinese expert consensus on the management of hypertension in the very elderly.

Authors:  Jing Li; Yi-Xin Hu; Wen Wang; Ning-Yuan Fang; Xin-Zheng Lu; Lin Pi; Mei-Lin Liu; Wei-Min Li; Yan-Fang Li; Peng Qu; Qi Hua; Qing He; Hai-Ying Wu; Yuan-Ming Zhang; Xiao-Ping Chen; Lu-Yuan Chen; Li Fan; Xing-Sheng Zhao; Zhi-Ming Zhu; Yi-Nong Jiang; Yi-Fang Guo; Hong Yuan; Ping-Jin Gao; Xin-Juan Xu; Jun Cai; Liang-Di Xie
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.327

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.