Literature DB >> 24983819

The neural basis of dishonest decisions that serve to harm or help the target.

Nobuhito Abe1, Toshikatsu Fujii2, Ayahito Ito2, Aya Ueno2, Yuta Koseki2, Ryusaku Hashimoto3, Akiko Hayashi2, Shunji Mugikura3, Shoki Takahashi3, Etsuro Mori2.   

Abstract

We conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study to elucidate the neurocognitive mechanisms of harmful and helpful dishonest decisions. During scanning, the subjects read scenarios concerning events that could occur in real-life situations and were asked to decide whether to tell a lie as though they were experiencing those events. Half of the scenarios consisted of harmful stories in which the dishonest decisions could be regarded as bad lies, and the other half consisted of helpful stories in which the dishonest decisions could be regarded as good lies. In contrast to the control decision-making task, we found that the decision-making tasks that involved honesty or dishonesty recruited a network of brain regions that included the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In the harmful stories, the right temporoparietal junction and the right medial frontal cortex were activated when the subjects made dishonest decisions compared with honest decisions. No region discriminated between the honest and dishonest decisions made in the helpful stories. These preliminary findings suggest that the neural basis of dishonest decisions is modulated by whether the lying serves to harm or help the target.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deception; Dishonesty; Prefrontal cortex; Temporoparietal junction; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24983819     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  12 in total

1.  Can beneficial ends justify lying? Neural responses to the passive reception of lies and truth-telling with beneficial and harmful monetary outcomes.

Authors:  Lijun Yin; Bernd Weber
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  The good lies: Altruistic goals modulate processing of deception in the anterior insula.

Authors:  Lijun Yin; Yang Hu; Dennis Dynowski; Jian Li; Bernd Weber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The Role of Reward System in Dishonest Behavior: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.

Authors:  Yibiao Liang; Genyue Fu; Runxin Yu; Yue Bi; Xiao Pan Ding
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  The role of anterior prefrontal cortex (area 10) in face-to-face deception measured with fNIRS.

Authors:  Paola Pinti; Andrea Devoto; Isobel Greenhalgh; Ilias Tachtsidis; Paul W Burgess; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Altruistic and self-serving goals modulate behavioral and neural responses in deception.

Authors:  Fang Cui; Song Wu; Haiyan Wu; Chengyao Wang; Can Jiao; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Deceptive but Not Honest Manipulative Actions Are Associated with Increased Interaction between Middle and Inferior Frontal gyri.

Authors:  Maxim Kireev; Alexander Korotkov; Natalia Medvedeva; Ruslan Masharipov; Svyatoslav Medvedev
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.

Authors:  Huijian Fu; Wenwei Qiu; Haiying Ma; Qingguo Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neural mechanisms of deception in a social context: an fMRI replication study.

Authors:  Maya Zheltyakova; Maxim Kireev; Alexander Korotkov; Svyatoslav Medvedev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Unfolding the Spatial and Temporal Neural Processing of Making Dishonest Choices.

Authors:  Delin Sun; Tatia M C Lee; Zhaoxin Wang; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  To Cheat or Not To Cheat: Tryptophan Hydroxylase 2 SNP Variants Contribute to Dishonest Behavior.

Authors:  Qiang Shen; Meijun Teo; Eyal Winter; Einav Hart; Soo H Chew; Richard P Ebstein
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.