OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to examine interventions for reducing HIV risk behaviors among people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States. METHODS: Systematic searches included electronic databases from 1988 to 2012, hand searches of journals, reference lists of articles, and HIV/AIDS Internet listservs. Each eligible study was evaluated against the established criteria on study design, implementation, analysis, and strength of findings to assess the risk of bias and intervention effects. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies were evaluated. Fourteen studies (29%) with both low risk of bias and significant positive intervention effects in reducing HIV transmission risk behaviors were classified as evidence-based interventions (EBIs). Thirty-four studies were classified as non-EBIs due to high risk of bias or nonsignificant positive intervention effects. EBIs varied in delivery from brief prevention messages to intensive multisession interventions. The key components of EBIs included addressing HIV risk reduction behaviors, motivation for behavioral change, misconception about HIV, and issues related to mental health, medication adherence, and HIV transmission risk behavior. CONCLUSION: Moving evidence-based prevention for PLWH into practice is an important step in making a greater impact on the HIV epidemic. Efficacious EBIs can serve as model programs for providers in healthcare and nonhealthcare settings looking to implement evidence-based HIV prevention. Clinics and public health agencies at the state, local, and federal levels can use the results of this review as a resource when making decisions that meet the needs of PLWH to achieve the greatest impact on the HIV epidemic.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to examine interventions for reducing HIV risk behaviors among people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States. METHODS: Systematic searches included electronic databases from 1988 to 2012, hand searches of journals, reference lists of articles, and HIV/AIDS Internet listservs. Each eligible study was evaluated against the established criteria on study design, implementation, analysis, and strength of findings to assess the risk of bias and intervention effects. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies were evaluated. Fourteen studies (29%) with both low risk of bias and significant positive intervention effects in reducing HIV transmission risk behaviors were classified as evidence-based interventions (EBIs). Thirty-four studies were classified as non-EBIs due to high risk of bias or nonsignificant positive intervention effects. EBIs varied in delivery from brief prevention messages to intensive multisession interventions. The key components of EBIs included addressing HIV risk reduction behaviors, motivation for behavioral change, misconception about HIV, and issues related to mental health, medication adherence, and HIV transmission risk behavior. CONCLUSION: Moving evidence-based prevention for PLWH into practice is an important step in making a greater impact on the HIV epidemic. Efficacious EBIs can serve as model programs for providers in healthcare and nonhealthcare settings looking to implement evidence-based HIV prevention. Clinics and public health agencies at the state, local, and federal levels can use the results of this review as a resource when making decisions that meet the needs of PLWH to achieve the greatest impact on the HIV epidemic.
Authors: M J Rotheram-Borus; M B Lee; D A Murphy; D Futterman; N Duan; J M Birnbaum; M Lightfoot Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: David Cosio; Timothy G Heckman; Timothy Anderson; Bernadette D Heckman; John Garske; John McCarthy Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Kathleen J Sikkema; Nathan B Hansen; Arlene Kochman; Jonathan Santos; Melissa H Watt; Patrick A Wilson; Allyson Delorenzo; Jay Laudato; Gal Mayer Journal: J Community Psychol Date: 2011-08-01
Authors: Michelle Teti; Lisa Bowleg; Russell Cole; Linda Lloyd; Susan Rubinstein; Susan Spencer; Erika Aaron; Ann Ricksecker; Zekarias Berhane; Marla Gold Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2009-04-09
Authors: Lytt I Gardner; Gary Marks; Christine M O'Daniels; Tracey E Wilson; Carol Golin; Julie Wright; E Byrd Quinlivan; Lucy Bradley-Springer; Melanie Thompson; Stephen Raffanti; Mark Thrun Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: David W Pantalone; Kimberly M Nelson; Abigail W Batchelder; Christopher Chiu; Hamish A Gunn; Keith J Horvath Journal: J Sex Res Date: 2020-02-20
Authors: Yue Pan; Lisa R Metsch; Lauren K Gooden; Morgan M Philbin; Eric S Daar; Antoine Douaihy; Petra Jacobs; Carlos Del Rio; Allan E Rodriguez; Daniel J Feaster Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Joel Milam; Sheldon Morris; Sonia Jain; Xiaoying Sun; Michael P Dubé; Eric S Daar; Gustavo Jimenez; Richard Haubrich Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2016-06
Authors: Dean G Cruess; Kaylee E Burnham; David J Finitsis; Brett M Goshe; Lauren Strainge; Moira Kalichman; Tamar Grebler; Chauncey Cherry; Seth C Kalichman Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2018-02-05
Authors: John Weiser; Linda Beer; Emma L Frazier; Roshni Patel; Antigone Dempsey; Heather Hauck; Jacek Skarbinski Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Jeffrey H Samet; Anita Raj; Debbie M Cheng; Elena Blokhina; Carly Bridden; Christine E Chaisson; Alexander Y Walley; Tibor P Palfai; Emily K Quinn; Edwin Zvartau; Dmitry Lioznov; Evgeny Krupitsky Journal: Addiction Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Heidi E Hutton; Catherine R Lesko; Ximin Li; Carol B Thompson; Bryan Lau; Sonia Napravnik; Kenneth H Mayer; W Christopher Mathews; Mary E McCaul; Heidi M Crane; Rob J Fredericksen; Karen L Cropsey; Michael Saag; Katerina Christopoulos; Geetanjali Chander Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2019-06