BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated higher-quality chest compressions (CCs) following a 60 s ultra-brief video (UBV) on compression-only CPR (CO-CPR). However, the effectiveness of UBVs as a CPR-teaching tool for lay bystanders in public venues remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether an UBV is effective in teaching laypersons CO-CPR in a public setting and if viewing leads to superior responsiveness and CPR skills. METHODS:Adult lay bystanders were enrolled in a public shopping mall and randomized to: (1) Control (CTR): sat idle for 60 s; (2) UBV: watched a 60 s UBV on CO-CPR. Subjects were read a scenario detailing a sudden collapse in the mall and asked to do what they "thought was best" on a mannequin. Performance measures were recorded for 2 min: responsiveness (time to call 911 and first CCs) and CPR quality [CC depth, rate, hands-off interval (time without CC after first CC)]. RESULTS:One hundred subjects were enrolled. Demographics were similar between groups. UBV subjects called 911 more frequently (percent difference: 31%) and initiated CCs sooner in the arrest scenario (median difference (MD): 5 s). UBV cohort had increased CC rate (MD: 19 cpm) and decreased hands-off interval (MD: 27 s). There was no difference in CC depth. CONCLUSION: Bystanders with UBV training in a shopping mall had significantly improved responsiveness, CC rate, and decreased hands-off interval. Given the short length of training, UBV may have potential as a ubiquitous intervention for public venues to help improve bystander reaction to arrest and CO-CPR performance. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated higher-quality chest compressions (CCs) following a 60 s ultra-brief video (UBV) on compression-only CPR (CO-CPR). However, the effectiveness of UBVs as a CPR-teaching tool for lay bystanders in public venues remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether an UBV is effective in teaching laypersons CO-CPR in a public setting and if viewing leads to superior responsiveness and CPR skills. METHODS: Adult lay bystanders were enrolled in a public shopping mall and randomized to: (1) Control (CTR): sat idle for 60 s; (2) UBV: watched a 60 s UBV on CO-CPR. Subjects were read a scenario detailing a sudden collapse in the mall and asked to do what they "thought was best" on a mannequin. Performance measures were recorded for 2 min: responsiveness (time to call 911 and first CCs) and CPR quality [CC depth, rate, hands-off interval (time without CC after first CC)]. RESULTS: One hundred subjects were enrolled. Demographics were similar between groups. UBV subjects called 911 more frequently (percent difference: 31%) and initiated CCs sooner in the arrest scenario (median difference (MD): 5 s). UBV cohort had increased CC rate (MD: 19 cpm) and decreased hands-off interval (MD: 27 s). There was no difference in CC depth. CONCLUSION: Bystanders with UBV training in a shopping mall had significantly improved responsiveness, CC rate, and decreased hands-off interval. Given the short length of training, UBV may have potential as a ubiquitous intervention for public venues to help improve bystander reaction to arrest and CO-CPR performance. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Authors: Audrey L Blewer; Mary E Putt; Lance B Becker; Barbara J Riegel; Jiaqi Li; Marion Leary; Judy A Shea; James N Kirkpatrick; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Peter W Groeneveld; Benjamin S Abella Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2016-10-04
Authors: Uzma Rahim Khan; Umerdad Khudadad; Noor Baig; Fareed Ahmed; Ahmed Raheem; Butool Hisam; Nadeem Ullah Khan; Marcus Ong Eng Hock; Junaid Abdul Razzak Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2022-06-03
Authors: Marina Del Rios; Josiah Han; Alejandra Cano; Victor Ramirez; Gabriel Morales; Teri L Campbell; Terry Vanden Hoek Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2018-02-20
Authors: Craig A Goolsby; Kandra Strauss-Riggs; Victoria Klimczak; Kelly Gulley; Luis Rojas; Cassandra Godar; Sorana Raiciulescu; Arthur L Kellermann; Thomas D Kirsch Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2018-03-22
Authors: Joris Nas; Jos Thannhauser; Priya Vart; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Niels van Royen; Judith L Bonnes; Marc A Brouwer Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 2.692