Literature DB >> 24983187

Greater efficacy of aldosterone blockade and diuretic reinforcement vs. dual renin-angiotensin blockade for left ventricular mass regression in patients with resistant hypertension.

Michel Azizi1, Ludivine Perdrix, Guillaume Bobrie, Michael Frank, Gilles Chatellier, Joël Ménard, Pierre-François Plouin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We report the results of an echocardiographic substudy carried out in a trial comparing the effects of two different treatment strategies - mineralocorticoid receptor blockade (MRB) and dual renin-angiotensin system blockade (RASB) - in patients with resistant hypertension. Both strategies reduce left ventricular mass index (LVMI), but they have not been compared in patients with resistant hypertension.
METHODS: After 4-week treatment with 300 mg irbesartan + 12.5 mg hydrochorothiazide + 5 mg amlodipine, 86 patients with resistant hypertension were randomized to the add-on 25 mg spironolactone (MRB group, n = 46) or 5 mg ramipril (RASB group, n = 40) groups for 12 weeks. Treatment intensity was increased at week 4, 8 or 10 if home blood pressure (BP) was equal to or above 135/85 mmHg, by sequentially adding 20-40 mg furosemide and 5 mg amiloride (MRB group), or 10 mg ramipril and 5-10 mg bisoprolol (RASB group). Transthoracic echography was performed at baseline and week 12.
RESULTS: Daytime ambulatory BP decreased by 19 ± 12/11 ± 8 mmHg in the MRB group and by 8 ± 13/7 ± 7 mmHg in the RASB group (P = 0.0003/0.03). LVMI decreased by 8.2 ± 18.9 g/m in the MRB group, whereas it increased by 1.8 ± 19.1 g/m in the RASB group (P = 0.03). The decreases in posterior wall thickness, left ventricular (LV) end-systolic diameter, E/e' ratio and left atrial area were significantly greater with MRB than with RASB. The difference between groups remained significant after adjustment for the decrease in ambulatory BP.
CONCLUSION: In patients with resistant hypertension, MRB-based treatment decreased both BP and LVMI more efficiently than a strategy based on dual RASB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24983187     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  5 in total

Review 1.  Preferred Fourth-Line Pharmacotherapy for Resistant Hypertension: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Hamish Cg Prosser; Cynthia Gregory; Dagmara Hering; Graham S Hillis; Greg Perry; Johan Rosman; Carl Schultz; Mark Thomas; Gerald F Watts; Markus P Schlaich
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Third-generation Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists: Why Do We Need a Fourth?

Authors:  Elise P Gomez-Sanchez
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  Organ damage changes in patients with resistant hypertension randomized to renal denervation or spironolactone: The DENERVHTA (Denervación en Hipertensión Arterial) study.

Authors:  Anna Oliveras; Pedro Armario; Laia Sans; Albert Clarà; Susana Vázquez; Luis Molina; Júlia Pareja; Alejandro de la Sierra; Julio Pascual
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Comparative efficacy of different types of antihypertensive drugs in reversing left ventricular hypertrophy as determined with echocardiography in hypertensive patients: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jian-Shu Chen; Ying Pei; Cai-E Li; Yin-Ning Li; Qiong-Ying Wang; Jing Yu
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Sequential nephron blockade with combined diuretics improves diastolic function in patients with resistant hypertension.

Authors:  David Fouassier; Anne Blanchard; Antoine Fayol; Guillaume Bobrie; Pierre Boutouyrie; Michel Azizi; Jean-Sébastien Hulot
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-06-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.