Literature DB >> 24983130

Long-term outcome of congenital aortic valve stenosis: predictors of reintervention.

Léa Hochstrasser1, Patrick Ruchat1, Nicole Sekarski2, Michel Hurni1, Ludwig K von Segesser1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term outcome of initial aortic valve intervention in a paediatric population with congenital aortic stenosis, and to determine risk factors associated with reintervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1985 to 2009, 77 patients with congenital aortic stenosis and a mean age of 5.8±5.6 years at diagnosis were followed up in our institution for 14.8±9.1 years.
RESULTS: First intervention was successful with 86% of patients having a residual peak aortic gradient 1 regurgitation increased by 7%. Long-term survival after the first procedure was excellent, with 91% survival at 25 years. At a mean interval of 7.6±5.3 years, 30 patients required a reintervention (39%), mainly because of a recurrent aortic stenosis. Freedom from reintervention was 97, 89, 75, 53, and 42% at 1, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years, respectively. Predictors of reintervention were residual peak aortic gradient (p=0.0001), aortic regurgitation post-intervention >1 (p=0.02), prior balloon aortic valvuloplasty (p=0.04), and increased left ventricular posterior wall thickness (p=0.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve intervention is a safe and effective procedure for congenital aortic stenosis with excellent survival results. However, rate of reintervention is high and influenced by increased left ventricular posterior wall thickness pre-intervention, prior balloon valvuloplasty, higher residual peak systolic valve gradient, and more than mild regurgitation post-intervention. The study highlights that long-term follow-up is recommended for these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital aortic valve stenosis; balloon valvuloplasty; predictors of reintervention; surgical valvotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24983130     DOI: 10.1017/S1047951114001085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol Young        ISSN: 1047-9511            Impact factor:   1.093


  6 in total

1.  Comprehensive MR Analysis of Cardiac Function, Aortic Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Strain in Pediatric Cohort with Isolated Bicuspid Aortic Valve.

Authors:  Heather A Stefek; Haben Berhane; Joshua D Robinson; Brian Reilly; Alexander Ruh; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement 12 years after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty in a young female adult with hope of pregnancy.

Authors:  Hirohiko Akutsu; Yuichiro Kaminishi; Soki Kurumisawa; Yoshio Misawa
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2016-02-26

Review 3.  Surgical Valvotomy Versus Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Garick D Hill; Salil Ginde; Rodrigo Rios; Peter C Frommelt; Kevin D Hill
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Surgical versus balloon valvotomy in neonates and infants: results from the UK National Audit.

Authors:  Dan Mihai Dorobantu; Demetris Taliotis; Robert Michael Tulloh; Mansour Thagavi Azar Sharabiani; Eltayeb Mohamed Ahmed; Gianni Davide Angelini; Serban Constantin Stoica
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-02-14

5.  Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in neonates: short- and long-term effects and predictors of successful outcome.

Authors:  Filip Tyc; Michal Galeczka; Jacek Białkowski; Katarzyna Kulig; Roland Fiszer
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.065

6.  Trajectory of Left Ventricular Remodeling in Children With Valvar Aortic Stenosis Following Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty.

Authors:  Koyelle Papneja; Zachary M Blatman; Ian D Kawpeng; Jacqueline Wheatley; Hanne Oscé; Boning Li; Myriam Lafreniere-Roula; Chun P S Fan; Cedric Manlhiot; Lee N Benson; Luc Mertens
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 7.792

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.