| Literature DB >> 24983003 |
Di Zhou1, Ping Shi2, Xiaoqing Wu2, Jinwei Ma3, Junbao Yu2.
Abstract
Applied with remote sensing, GIS, and mathematical statistics, the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of urbanization expansion of Yantai city from 1974 to 2009 was studied. Based on landscape pattern metrics and ecological risk index, the landscape ecological risk from the landscape pattern dynamics was evaluated. The results showed that the area of urban land increased by 189.77 km(2) with average expansion area of 5.42 km(2) y(-1) from 1974 to 2009. The urbanization intensity index during 2004-2009 was 3.92 times of that during 1974-1990. The land use types of urban land and farmland changed greatly. The changes of landscape pattern metrics for land use patterns indicated that the intensity of human activities had strengthened gradually in study period. The landscape ecological risk pattern of Yantai city shaped half-round rings along the coastline. The ecological risk index decreased with increase of the distance to the coastline. The ratio of high ecological risk to subhigh ecological risk zones in 2009 was 2.23 times of that in 1990. The significant linear relationship of urbanization intensity index and regional ecological risk indicated that the anthropological economic activities were decisive factors for sustainable development of costal ecological environment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24983003 PMCID: PMC4005153 DOI: 10.1155/2014/821781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Location map of the study area.
Description of landscape pattern metrics.
| Index | Equation | Ecological significance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Largest Patch Index (LPI) |
| (i) | To indicate ratio of the largest patch area to total landscape area |
| Fractal Dimension Index (FD) |
| (ii) | To reflect the complexity of self-similarity of a patch |
| Shannon's Diversity Index (SHDI) |
| (iii) | To reflect landscape heterogeneity |
| Shannon's Evenness Index (SHEI) |
| (iv) | To indicate even degree of different landscape types |
| Dominance Index (Dominance) |
| (v) | To what extent several principal landscape types control whole landscape |
| Contagion Index (CONTAG) |
| (vi) | To express the agglomeration degree among different landscape types |
I:patch type; j: number of patch; A: the total area; a : the area of patch ij; l: patch perimeter; k: a constant, as to grid map, k equals to 4; g : contiguity number among patch h and patch i; p : the area ratio of class i; m: quantity of region landscape types.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of urban land in the study area.
Figure 3Area of urban land during the period of 1974–2009.
Urbanization extension in Yantai city in different historical periods.
| Different period | Extension area (km2) | Annual expansion area (km2 y−1) | Urbanization intensity index |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1974–1990 | 52.81 | 3.30 | 0.12 |
| 1990–2000 | 44.76 | 4.48 | 0.16 |
| 2000–2009 | 92.20 | 10.24 | 0.38 |
| 1974–2009 | 189.77 | 5.42 | 0.20 |
Area and percentage of land use types in Yantai city from 1990 to 2009.
| LUCC type | 1990 | 2000 | 2009 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area (km2) | Percentage (%) | Area (km2) | Percentage (%) | Area (km2) | Percentage (%) | |
| Urban land | 82.24 | 3.02 | 127.00 | 4.67 | 219.20 | 8.06 |
| Farmland | 1318.33 | 48.45 | 1173.11 | 43.11 | 1081.05 | 39.73 |
| Orchard | 182.76 | 6.72 | 275.20 | 10.11 | 308.15 | 11.32 |
| Forestland | 657.62 | 24.17 | 697.65 | 25.64 | 662.41 | 24.34 |
| Grassland | 215.11 | 7.91 | 163.72 | 6.02 | 138.51 | 5.09 |
| Water body | 79.72 | 2.93 | 89.21 | 3.28 | 87.80 | 3.23 |
| Other construction land | 131.34 | 4.83 | 150.05 | 5.51 | 180.65 | 6.64 |
| Other object land | 53.92 | 1.98 | 45.10 | 1.66 | 43.27 | 1.59 |
Dynamic change of landscape metrics from 1990 to 2009.
| Year | LPI | FD | SHDI | SHEI | Dominance | CONTAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 23.32 | 1.0671 | 1.55 | 0.71 | 0.29 | 54.49 |
| 2000 | 22.20 | 1.0679 | 1.62 | 0.74 | 0.26 | 52.72 |
| 2009 | 20.35 | 1.0682 | 1.68 | 0.76 | 0.24 | 51.26 |
Figure 4Spatial distribution of ecological risk in 1990–2009 ((I) low ecological risk, (II) sublow ecological risk, (III) moderate ecological risk, (IV) subhigh ecological risk, and (V) high ecological risk).
Area of different level ecological risk from 1990 to 2009.
| Ecological risk grade | 1990 | 2000 | 2009 | 1990 | 2000 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area (km2) | Area proportion (%) | |||||
| Low ecological risk region | 92.97 | 91.47 | 88.47 | 3.42 | 3.36 | 3.25 |
| Sublow ecological risk region | 654.59 | 629.28 | 388.12 | 24.07 | 23.14 | 14.27 |
| Moderate ecological risk region | 1633.04 | 1550.90 | 1487.92 | 60.05 | 57.03 | 54.72 |
| Subhigh ecological risk region | 300.94 | 386.22 | 650.65 | 11.07 | 14.2 | 23.93 |
| High ecological risk region | 37.79 | 61.47 | 104.18 | 1.39 | 2.26 | 3.83 |
Figure 5The relationship between urbanization intensity index and region ecological risk.