Literature DB >> 24982707

Exertional rhabdomyolysis in the athlete: a clinical review.

David C Tietze1, James Borchers2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Exertional rhabdomyolysis is a relatively uncommon but potentially fatal condition affecting athletes that requires prompt recognition and appropriate management. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A search of the PubMed database from 2003 to 2013 using the term exertional rhabdomyolysis was performed. Further evaluation of the bibliographies of articles expanded the evidence. STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
RESULTS: Exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER) is a relatively uncommon condition with an incidence of approximately 29.9 per 100,000 patient years but can have very serious consequences of muscle ischemia, cardiac arrhythmia, and death. The athlete will have pain, weakness, and swelling in the muscles affected as well as significantly elevated levels of creatine kinase (CK). Hydration is the foundation for any athlete with ER; management can also include dialysis or surgery. Stratifying the athlete into high- or low-risk categories can determine if further workup is warranted.
CONCLUSION: Exertional rhabdomyolysis evaluation requires a history, physical examination, and serology for definitive diagnosis. Treatment modalities should include rest and hydration. Return to play and future workup should be determined by the risk stratification of the athlete. STRENGTH-OF-RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY SORT: C.

Entities:  

Keywords:  athlete; exertional rhabdomyolysis; review

Year:  2014        PMID: 24982707      PMCID: PMC4065559          DOI: 10.1177/1941738114523544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Health        ISSN: 1941-0921            Impact factor:   3.843


Overuse injuries are common in athletes and present a variety of challenges. For many athletes, the medical management and return-to-sport considerations of overuse injuries involve many variables including the goals of the athlete, medical staff, family, coach, and administration. Although exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER) is relatively rare, the consequences can be fatal, and therefore, appropriate treatment should be initiated to limit morbidity and mortality.

Pathophysiology

Exertional rhabdomyolysis is characterized by the breakdown and necrosis of striated skeletal muscle after engaging in physical activity.[6] Although there are several different mechanisms that can lead to skeletal muscle cell damage and death, the common final pathway is an increase in intracellular free ionized calcium to a level much higher than normal in the cytoplasm and mitochondria.[6] In rhabdomyolysis secondary to trauma, the increase in intracellular calcium is caused by direct injury and rupture of the cellular membrane.[6] ER also has an overproduction of heat, resulting in increased intracellular calcium via depletion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP).[6] The loss of ATP causes dysfunction of Na/K–ATPase and Ca2+ATPase pumps, leading to an increase of intracellular calcium.[6] This increase in intracellular calcium leads to the activation of proteases and production of reactive oxygen species, eventually culminating into the death of the skeletal muscle cells. Necrosis of skeletal muscle cells releases intracellular contents causing pain, swelling, and potential end organ damage in the athlete.[6]

Epidemiology

Rhabdomyolysis is associated with hyper- and hypothermia, sickle cell trait (and other ischemic conditions), exertion, crush syndromes, infection, autoimmune and metabolic disorders, and certain drugs.[19] Stimulants such as phentermine have been associated with exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis.[18] Sports that reported ER include American football, swimming, bodybuilding, and running.[2,4,5,9,16,17] In football, a retrospective cohort of high school football players identified 22 of 43 players at a football camp with ER[16]; 12 were hospitalized and 3 were also diagnosed with compartment syndrome. Repetitive eccentric loading, hyperthermia, and dehydration were contributing factors. A case series of 7 Division I swimming athletes identified increased activity in well-conditioned athletes as a cause of ER.[5] Urine myoglobin was present in 3 of the 7 athletes. The swimmers underwent an intense pushup routine and body squats the week prior, provoking the syndrome. Not every swimmer developed ER, suggesting additional factors unique to those affected. A bodybuilder diagnosed with ER and compartment syndrome of the lower extremity overused a supplement, creatine monophosphate; overexertion may have caused ER in this case.[4] A “perfect storm” consisting of bacterial/viral illness, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, and latent myopathy can cause renal failure and potentially death in runners.[2] Athletes may develop a hematologic profile consistent with ER but not develop the clinical condition. A study of ultra-marathon runners demonstrated myoglobinuria in 25 of 44 participants (57%).[17] The mean increase in creatine kinase (CK) was 2400 U/L 48 hours after the race. None of the ultra-marathoners developed clinical symptoms of ER or end organ damage (renal failure). In military personnel, the incidence of ER was 29.9 per 100,000 person-years.[1] Of the 435 US service members that were diagnosed with ER, 48% were hospitalized. Black, non-Hispanic male members younger than 20 years were most affected; the majority of cases occurred between June and August.[1] Common themes surrounding the epidemiology of ER include sudden alterations in training regimen, heat illness, poor conditioning, and dehydration.[2,4,5,9,16,17]

Diagnosis

Exertional rhabdomyolysis may be an extreme continuation of delayed-onset muscle soreness.[12] Affected individuals typically complain of proportional pain, tenderness, weakness, and swelling in the muscles affected following athletic activity. Elevated CK levels 5 times the upper limit of normal with these symptoms are required for diagnosis.[8] Black football players with sickle cell trait are at a 37 times higher risk of exertional-related death when compared with their non–sickle cell trait counterparts.[7] The cause of this increase in mortality is not completely understood. The depletion of ATP that occurs with ER and the sickling nature of red blood cells may deplete skeletal muscle of oxygen or may represent an autoimmune phenomenon.[7] Elevated levels of CK are normal after exercise in healthy, asymptomatic individuals, and blacks have higher baseline CK levels.[13] In 499 military recruits, peak CK levels occurred at day 7 of initial basic training (mean, 1226 IU/L; range, 56-35,056 IU/L).[8] Recruits did not develop clinically significant ER, but a CK range considering ethnicity should be considered. A cumulative increase in resting serum CK was noted in 22 Division I football players over the course of a single season.[9] The peak CK range was 119 to 2834 IU/L after the ninth game of the season. A study comparing athletes with nonathletes in Greece noted that athletes have a significantly higher baseline CK level.[12] The range for diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis differs for each laboratory, but traditionally, it includes an increase of CK 5 to 10 times the upper limit of normal.[8] Significantly elevated CK must be present for the diagnosis of ER but should be made in association with the presenting clinical syndrome of muscle weakness, swelling, pain, and occasionally, darkening of the urine to differentiate rhabdomyolysis from other causes. Elevated levels of myoglobin will occasionally lead to darkened urine (tea or cola colored), with positive blood findings on urinalysis without red blood cells.[15] Rapid clearance of myoglobin from the urine makes it a less sensitive indicator for ER, and it should not be used as the sole objective diagnostic marker.[2] Severe consequences of this condition include disseminated intravascular coagulation, acute kidney failure, hyperkalemia, and cardiac dysrhythmias.[2] Elevated levels of myoglobin in the serum do not necessarily predispose an athlete to renal failure.[17] Of the deaths that occurred in athletes because of this condition, other factors, including recent illness and cardiac ischemia, were listed as potential causes as well. Prompt recognition of these symptoms is paramount.[2]

Treatment

In mild cases, ER may go undiagnosed and could be managed on an outpatient basis with oral hydration and rest.[14] For an athlete with severe symptoms (CK greater than 5 times the upper limit of normal or darkening of the urine), hospital admission is indicated for intravenous hydration with normal saline (1-2 L/h) maintaining a urine output of 200 mL/h.[15] Along with intravenous hydration, the tracking of CK levels, kidney function, and electrolyte values is much easier to manage in an inpatient setting where continuous venovenous hemodialysis and other services are readily available. CK levels should be monitored daily. If levels continue to elevate past 48 to 72 hours from the time of injury, consultation of a nephrologist or surgeon should be considered, depending on the severity of kidney disease or presence of compartment syndrome.[14] Continuous venovenous hemodialysis should be considered if the athlete is not be able to maintain appropriate volume or electrolyte balance.[14] Diuretics (thiazides and loop diuretics) can further deteriorate kidney function in this setting and should be prohibited.[14]

Return to Sport

There are no evidence-based guidelines for return to play after an episode of ER. Athletes may be at high risk or low risk (Table 1).[15] Athletes at high risk should be evaluated for myopathic disorders.[10,15] Testing may include electromyogram, genetic testing, muscle biopsy, exercise challenge, and caffeine-halothane muscle contracture testing.[15] In low-risk athletes, a gradual return is likely acceptable if the athlete is afebrile, symptom free, and well hydrated and CK levels are normal, myoglobin is no longer present in the serum or urine, the urine is clear, and there is no muscle pain.[3] A conservative return to sport was described at the Consortium for Health and Military Performance (Table 2).[15]
Table 1.

Exertional rhabdomyolysis

High-Risk AthleteLow-Risk Athlete
Delayed recovery (longer than 1 week)Rapid clinical recovery and CK normalization after exercise restrictions
Persistent elevation of CK despite rest for 2 weeksSufficiently fit or well-trained athlete with a history of intense training/exercise
Acute renal injury to any degreeNo personal or family history of rhabdomyolysis
Personal or family history of ERExistence of other group or team-related cases of ER during the same exercise sessions
Personal or family history of recurrent muscle crampsSuspected or documented concomitant viral illness
Personal or family history of malignant hyperthermiaIngestion of a drug or dietary supplement that could contribute to the development of ER
Personal or family history of sickle cell trait
Muscle injury after low to moderate workout activity
Personal history of significant heat injury
Serum CK peak of greater than 100,000 U/L

CK, creatine kinase; ER, exertional rhabdomyolysis.

Table 2.

CHAMP guidelines for return to sport following exertional rhabdomyolysis

Phase 1

Rest for 72 hours and encouragement of oral hydration

8 hours of sleep nightly

Remain in a thermally controlled environment if the episode of ER was in relation to heat illness

Follow-up after 72 hours with a repeat serum CK level and UA

If the CK has dropped to below 5 times the upper limit of normal and the UA is negative, the athlete can progress to phase 2; if not, reassessment in 72 additional hours is warranted

Should the UA remain abnormal or the CK remain elevated for 2 weeks, expert consultation is recommended

Phase 2

Begin light activities, no strenuous activity

Physical activity at own pace/distance

Follow-up with a care provider in 1 week

If there is no return of clinical symptoms, the athlete can progress to phase 3; if not, the athlete should remain in phase 2 checking with the health care professional every week for reassessment; if muscle pain persists beyond the fourth week, consider expert evaluation to include psychiatry

Phase 3

Gradual return to regular sport/physical training

Follow-up with care provider as needed

CHAMP, Consortium for Health and Military Performance; ER, exertional rhabdomyolysis; CK, creatine kinase; UA, urinalysis.

Exertional rhabdomyolysis CK, creatine kinase; ER, exertional rhabdomyolysis. CHAMP guidelines for return to sport following exertional rhabdomyolysis Rest for 72 hours and encouragement of oral hydration 8 hours of sleep nightly Remain in a thermally controlled environment if the episode of ER was in relation to heat illness Follow-up after 72 hours with a repeat serum CK level and UA If the CK has dropped to below 5 times the upper limit of normal and the UA is negative, the athlete can progress to phase 2; if not, reassessment in 72 additional hours is warranted Should the UA remain abnormal or the CK remain elevated for 2 weeks, expert consultation is recommended Begin light activities, no strenuous activity Physical activity at own pace/distance Follow-up with a care provider in 1 week If there is no return of clinical symptoms, the athlete can progress to phase 3; if not, the athlete should remain in phase 2 checking with the health care professional every week for reassessment; if muscle pain persists beyond the fourth week, consider expert evaluation to include psychiatry Gradual return to regular sport/physical training Follow-up with care provider as needed CHAMP, Consortium for Health and Military Performance; ER, exertional rhabdomyolysis; CK, creatine kinase; UA, urinalysis.

Conclusion

Exertional rhabdomyolysis is a relatively uncommon condition but can have very serious consequences if not recognized and managed appropriately. The athlete will typically present with pain, tenderness, weakness, and swelling in the muscles affected after engaging in physical activity. Hyperthermia, changes in workout regimen, sickle cell anemia, certain medications (stimulants and NSAIDs), preexisting illness, and autoimmune or metabolic disorders may predispose an athlete to ER. NSAIDs and illness may predispose the athlete to renal failure, especially long-distance runners. The diagnosis of ER requires serum CK levels 5 times the upper limit of normal. Treatment should include rest and hydration. Further testing may be needed if the athlete is considered high risk.
  18 in total

1.  Exertional rhabdomyolysis in a bodybuilder following overexertion: a possible link to creatine overconsumption.

Authors:  Khoa D Do; Carlo Bellabarba; Sanjay M Bhananker
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.638

2.  Reference intervals for serum creatine kinase in athletes.

Authors:  Vassilis Mougios
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Exertional rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure in marathon runners.

Authors:  Priscilla M Clarkson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Rhabdomyolysis associated with phentermine.

Authors:  Kelly E Steidl; William Darko; Luke A Probst; John A Noviasky; Samer Nasser
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 2.637

5.  Serum creatine kinase after exercise: drawing the line between physiological response and exertional rhabdomyolysis.

Authors:  Kimbra Kenney; Mark E Landau; Rodney S Gonzalez; Julie Hundertmark; Karen O'Brien; William W Campbell
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  The syndrome of rhabdomyolysis: Pathophysiology and diagnosis.

Authors:  George D Giannoglou; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Gesthimani Misirli
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.487

7.  Dehydration, cramping, and exertional rhabdomyolysis: a case report with suggestions for recovery.

Authors:  Michelle Cleary; Daniel Ruiz; Lindsey Eberman; Israel Mitchell; Helen Binkley
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.931

8.  Myoglobinuria, rhabdomyolysis and marathon running.

Authors:  H B Schiff; E T MacSearraigh; J C Kallmeyer
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1978-10

9.  Relationship of ethnic origin, gender, and age to blood creatine kinase levels.

Authors:  Ryan C Neal; Keith C Ferdinand; Joseph Ycas; Elinor Miller
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 10.  Return to physical activity after exertional rhabdomyolysis.

Authors:  Francis G O'Connor; Fred H Brennan; William Campbell; Yuval Heled; Patricia Deuster
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.733

View more
  12 in total

1.  A case of exercise induced rhabdomyolysis from calf raises.

Authors:  Jeffrey Gardecki; Henry Schuitema; James Espinosa; Alan Lucerna
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2017

Review 2.  The Potential Role of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage in Exertional Heat Stroke.

Authors:  Zidong Li; Zachary J McKenna; Matthew R Kuennen; Flávio de Castro Magalhães; Christine M Mermier; Fabiano T Amorim
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Severe localized scapular pain after a strenuous weight-lifting session.

Authors:  Rosamond E Lougheed Simpson; Steven R Joseph; Lisa Fischer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Exertional Rhabdomyolysis After CrossFit Exercise.

Authors:  Prakash Adhikari; Adithya Hari; Laurent Morel; Yolin Bueno
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-01-11

5.  Low-Intensity Repetitive Exercise Induced Rhabdomyolysis.

Authors:  Mina Tran; Nicholas Hayden; Brandon Garcia; Veronica Tucci
Journal:  Case Rep Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-26

Review 6.  Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety.

Authors:  Stephen D Patterson; Luke Hughes; Stuart Warmington; Jamie Burr; Brendan R Scott; Johnny Owens; Takashi Abe; Jakob L Nielsen; Cleiton Augusto Libardi; Gilberto Laurentino; Gabriel Rodrigues Neto; Christopher Brandner; Juan Martin-Hernandez; Jeremy Loenneke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  External Workload Indicators of Muscle and Kidney Mechanical Injury in Endurance Trail Running.

Authors:  Daniel Rojas-Valverde; Braulio Sánchez-Ureña; José Pino-Ortega; Carlos Gómez-Carmona; Randall Gutiérrez-Vargas; Rafael Timón; Guillermo Olcina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Urinary Biomarkers: Diagnostic Tools for Monitoring Athletes' Health Status.

Authors:  Raffaela Pero; Mariarita Brancaccio; Cristina Mennitti; Luca Gentile; Sergio Arpino; Renato De Falco; Eleonora Leggiero; Annaluisa Ranieri; Chiara Pagliuca; Roberta Colicchio; Paola Salvatore; Giovanni D'Alicandro; Giulia Frisso; Barbara Lombardo; Cristina Mazzaccara; Raffaella Faraonio; Olga Scudiero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Recurrent Exercise-Induced Rhabdomyolysis in a Healthy Adolescent Girl.

Authors:  Nicolas C Longobardi; Yen Longobardi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-12

10.  Response: Commentary: Can Blood Flow Restricted Exercise Cause Muscle Damage? Commentary on Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety.

Authors:  Jamie F Burr; Luke Hughes; Stuart Warmington; Brendan R Scott; Johnny Owens; Takashi Abe; Jakob L Nielsen; Cleiton Augusto Libardi; Gilberto Laurentino; Gabriel Rodrigues Neto; Christopher Brandner; Juan Martin-Hernandez; Jeremy Loenneke; Stephen D Patterson
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.