Literature DB >> 24982494

Impact of referral letters on scheduling of hospital appointments: a randomised control trial.

Moyez Jiwa1, Xingqiong Meng2, Carolyn O'Shea3, Parker Magin4, Ann Dadich5, Vinita Pillai1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Communication is essential for triage, but intervention trials to improve it are scarce. Referral Writer (RW), a referral letter software program, enables documentation of clinical data and extracts relevant patient details from clinical software. AIM: To evaluate whether specialists are more confident about scheduling appointments when they receive more information in referral letters. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Single-blind, parallel-groups, controlled design with a 1:1 randomisation. Australian GPs watched video vignettes virtually.
METHOD: GPs wrote referral letters after watching vignettes of patients with cancer symptoms. Letter content was scored against a benchmark. The proportions of referral letters triagable by a specialist with confidence, and in which the specialist was confident the patient had potentially life-limiting pathology were determined. Categorical outcomes were tested with χ(2) and continuous outcomes with t-tests. A random-effects logistic model assessed the influence of group randomisation (RW versus control), GP demographics, clinical specialty, and specialist referral assessor on specialist confidence in the information provided.
RESULTS: The intervention (RW) group referred more patients and scored significantly higher on information relayed (mean difference 21.6 [95% confidence intervals {CI} = 20.1 to 23.2]). There was no difference in the proportion of letters for which specialists were confident they had sufficient information for appointment scheduling (RW 77.7% versus control 80.6%, P = 0.16). In the logistic model, limited agreement among specialists contributed substantially to the observed differences in appointment scheduling (P = 35% [95% CI 16% to 59%]).
CONCLUSION: In isolation, referral letter templates are unlikely to improve the scheduling of specialist appointments, even when more information is relayed. © British Journal of General Practice 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; general practice; interdisciplinary correspondence; neoplasms; randomised control trial; referral and consultation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24982494      PMCID: PMC4073727          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X680509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  19 in total

1.  Cancer recognition and primary care.

Authors:  Nicholas Summerton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Scripts and clinical reasoning.

Authors:  Bernard Charlin; Henny P A Boshuizen; Eugene J Custers; Paul J Feltovich
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 3.  Inequity in access to cancer care: a review of the Canadian literature.

Authors:  André R Maddison; Yukiko Asada; Robin Urquhart
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Factors influencing selection for rehabilitation after stroke: a questionnaire using case scenarios to investigate physician perspectives and level of agreement.

Authors:  Genevieve M Kennedy; Kim A Brock; Alison W Lunt; Susan J Black
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  [Referring patients with chronic renal failure: differences in referral criteria between hospitals].

Authors:  Loes J Meijer; François G Schellevis
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2012

6.  Modes of presentation and pathways to diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Queensland.

Authors:  Brigid M Lynch; Peter Baade; Lin Fritschi; Barbara Leggett; Neville Owen; Kenneth Pakenham; Beth Newman; Joanne F Aitken
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Does the primary-care gatekeeper control the costs of health care? Lessons from the SAFECO experience.

Authors:  S H Moore; D P Martin; W C Richardson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey.

Authors:  Annette J Berendsen; Annegriet Kuiken; Wim H G M Benneker; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Theo B Voorn; Jan Schuling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  GP letter writing in colorectal cancer: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa; Jennifer Burr
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.580

10.  The hidden inequity in health care.

Authors:  Barbara Starfield
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2011-04-20
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Improving quality of referral letters from primary to secondary care: a literature review and discussion paper.

Authors:  Patrick Tobin-Schnittger; Jane O'Doherty; Ray O'Connor; Andrew O'Regan
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.458

2.  Management of behavioural change in patients presenting with a diagnosis of dementia: a video vignette study with Australian general practitioners.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa; Pam Nichols; Parker Magin; Georgina Pagey; Xingqiong Meng; Richard Parsons; Vinita Pillai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  How do general practitioners manage patients with cancer symptoms? A video-vignette study.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa; Xingqiong Meng; Carolyn O'Shea; Parker Magin; Ann Dadich; Vinita Pillai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Electronic checklists improve referral letters in gastroenterology: a randomized vignette survey.

Authors:  Sigrun Losada Eskeland; Corina Silvia Rueegg; Cathrine Brunborg; Lars Aabakken; Thomas de Lange
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.038

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.