Literature DB >> 24982277

Clinical and radiographic success of mineral trioxide aggregate compared with formocresol as a pulpotomy treatment in primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abdullah A Marghalani1, Samah Omar2, Jung-Wei Chen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the long-term clinical and radiographic success of using mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and formocresol (FC) as a pulp-dressing material in pulpotomy treatment in primary molars. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors searched MEDLINE, Thomson Reuters Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from Jan. 1, 1990, to May 9, 2013. For an RCT to be included, the authors required that the primary molars treated with a pulpotomy procedure must have received stainless steel crowns as a final restoration and that rubber dam isolation was used during treatment; that the pulp must have been vital as determined clinically by means of hemorrhage control with a cotton pellet; and that the RCT must have included a follow-up period of at least two years. For each included RCT, two authors assessed the risk of bias independently.
RESULTS: The authors identified 20 trials and included five of them. A total of 377 primary molars were treated. The authors judged that none of the included RCTs had a low risk of bias. They noted no significant differences in clinical success (relative risk [RR] = 1.01; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.05) and radiographic success (RR = 1.09; 95 percent CI, 0.97-1.21) for primary molars treated with MTA versus those treated with FC. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: On the basis of the limited evidence, pulpotomy procedures performed in primary molars involving the use of MTA or FC showed comparable clinical success rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Formocresol; evidence-based dentistry; meta-analysis; mineral trioxide aggregate; pediatric dentistry; primary molar; pulpotomy; review literature; systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24982277     DOI: 10.14219/jada.2014.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  7 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars.

Authors:  P Juneja; S Kulkarni
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2017-08-05

2.  Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Four Bioceramic Materials with Different Restorative Materials and Timings.

Authors:  Abeer S Alqahtani; Ayman M Sulimany; Abdullah S Alayad; Abdulaziz S Alqahtani; Omar A Bawazir
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Clinical efficacy of Er:YAG laser application in pulpotomy of primary molars: a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Junhui Wang; Yujiang Chen; Baize Zhang; Xin Ge; Xiaojing Wang
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.555

4.  Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Diluted Formocresol Pulpotomy: Prospective and Retrospective Study Outcomes.

Authors:  Neehal Ghoniem; Veena Vaidyanathan; Cameron M Zealand; John M Sushynski; Sarah M Mettlach; Tatiana M Botero; Robert F Majewski; James R Boynton; Jan C-C Hu
Journal:  J Mich Dent Assoc       Date:  2018-04

Review 5.  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.

Authors:  Violaine Smaïl-Faugeron; Anne-Marie Glenny; Frédéric Courson; Pierre Durieux; Michele Muller-Bolla; Helene Fron Chabouis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-31

Review 6.  Vital and Nonvital Pulp Therapy in Primary Dentition: An Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Luísa Bandeira Lopes; Catarina Calvão; Filipa Salema Vieira; João Albernaz Neves; José João Mendes; Vanessa Machado; João Botelho
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of different materials in primary molar pulpotomies: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Chih-Yu Lin; Chun-Liang Kuo; Cheng-Yu Hsieh; Jen-Chang Yang; Kai-Ti Chang; Hsiao-Ting Huang; Sung-Chih Hsieh; Nai-Chia Teng
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.080

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.