AIMS: To investigate whether or not a stage tailored intervention is more effective than a non-stage tailored intervention of the same intensity in reducing alcohol use among job-seekers with unhealthy alcohol use, and whether initial motivation to change is a moderator of efficacy. DESIGN: A three-group randomized controlled trial with 3-, 6- and 15-month follow-ups. SETTING: Three job agencies in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1243 job-seekers with unhealthy alcohol use were randomized to (i) stage tailored intervention based on the transtheoretical model of change (ST), (ii) non-stage tailored intervention based on the theory of planned behaviour (NST) and (iii) assessment only (controls). Participants received feedback letters and manuals at baseline and 3 months later. MEASUREMENTS: Piecewise latent growth models were calculated measuring change in 'alcohol use' from baseline to month 3 (active intervention phase) and from months 3 to 15 (post-intervention phase, primary outcome). Motivation to change was included as a 4-point continuous measure. FINDINGS: All groups reduced alcohol use from months 0 to 3 (controls: mean = -0.866, NST: mean = -0.883, ST: mean = -0.718, Ps ≤ 0.001). Post-intervention (months 3-15), low-motivated individuals in the ST group showed a greater reduction than those in the control group (β = 0.135, P = 0.039, Cohen's d = 0.42) and in the NST group (β = 0.180, P = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.55). In contrast, compared to the ST group (β = 0.030, P = 0.361), alcohol use decreased more strongly with higher initial motivation in the NST group (β = -0.118, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Among job-seekers with high levels of alcohol consumption, an intervention tailored to motivational 'stage of change' was more effective than a non-stage tailored intervention for reducing alcohol use 15 months after baseline assessment in participants with low initial motivation to change.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To investigate whether or not a stage tailored intervention is more effective than a non-stage tailored intervention of the same intensity in reducing alcohol use among job-seekers with unhealthy alcohol use, and whether initial motivation to change is a moderator of efficacy. DESIGN: A three-group randomized controlled trial with 3-, 6- and 15-month follow-ups. SETTING: Three job agencies in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1243 job-seekers with unhealthy alcohol use were randomized to (i) stage tailored intervention based on the transtheoretical model of change (ST), (ii) non-stage tailored intervention based on the theory of planned behaviour (NST) and (iii) assessment only (controls). Participants received feedback letters and manuals at baseline and 3 months later. MEASUREMENTS: Piecewise latent growth models were calculated measuring change in 'alcohol use' from baseline to month 3 (active intervention phase) and from months 3 to 15 (post-intervention phase, primary outcome). Motivation to change was included as a 4-point continuous measure. FINDINGS: All groups reduced alcohol use from months 0 to 3 (controls: mean = -0.866, NST: mean = -0.883, ST: mean = -0.718, Ps ≤ 0.001). Post-intervention (months 3-15), low-motivated individuals in the ST group showed a greater reduction than those in the control group (β = 0.135, P = 0.039, Cohen's d = 0.42) and in the NST group (β = 0.180, P = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.55). In contrast, compared to the ST group (β = 0.030, P = 0.361), alcohol use decreased more strongly with higher initial motivation in the NST group (β = -0.118, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Among job-seekers with high levels of alcohol consumption, an intervention tailored to motivational 'stage of change' was more effective than a non-stage tailored intervention for reducing alcohol use 15 months after baseline assessment in participants with low initial motivation to change.
Authors: Jennis Freyer-Adam; Sophie Baumann; Gallus Bischof; Andreas Staudt; Christian Goeze; Beate Gaertner; Ulrich John Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2022-01-28
Authors: Andreas Staudt; Jennis Freyer-Adam; Christian Meyer; Gallus Bischof; Ulrich John; Sophie Baumann Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2022-06-30
Authors: Jennis Freyer-Adam; Florian Noetzel; Sophie Baumann; Ali Alexander Aghdassi; Ulrike Siewert-Markus; Beate Gaertner; Ulrich John Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-11-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jogé Boumans; Dike van de Mheen; Rik Crutzen; Hans Dupont; Rob Bovens; Andrea Rozema Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 3.390