Literature DB >> 24981159

Evaluating collaborative planning methods supporting programme-based planning in natural resource management.

Harald Vacik1, Mikko Kurttila2, Teppo Hujala3, Chiranjeewee Khadka4, Arto Haara5, Jouni Pykäläinen6, Päivi Honkakoski7, Bernhard Wolfslehner8, Jukka Tikkanen9.   

Abstract

Programme-based Planning of Natural Resources (PBPNR) is an evolving planning frame for solving complex land use, environmental and forest management problems within hierarchically administrated funding and decision-making schemes. PBPNR acknowledges that an effective planning process requires the combined consideration of environmental, technological, economic and socio-political factors. To reach acceptability, commitment and operability, PBPNR processes need to foster collaboration and learning. For this study, an analysis of 43 collaborative planning methods was conducted to examine their potential to be applied within PBPNR. We present the approach of screening the applicability of methods for specific needs that may occur in PBPNR. The approach is based on a list of key criteria for the phases of a collaborative planning process: problem identification, problem modelling and problem solving. The features of each method were qualitatively assessed and peer-reviewed by a team of experts. Most of the methods are able to deal with qualitative data, support processes to increase transparency in planning and capture the preferences of the participating stakeholders. They also produce understandable results for the three phases. Contrarily, many methods do not offer features to handle uncertainty, nor do they satisfactorily stimulate creativity and innovation in the planning process. The results show that the overall applicability of the reviewed methods for the three planning phases varies according to a cluster analysis basing on the capabilities of the methods. Methods such as "Planning for Real", "Open Space" and "A'WOT" seem to be particularly promising for a broad range of planning situations.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Group decision making; Natural resource management; Participatory planning; Problem identification; Problem modelling; Problem solving

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24981159     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  2 in total

1.  Knowledge that Acts: Evaluating the Outcomes of a Knowledge Brokering Intervention in Western Australia's Ningaloo Region.

Authors:  Kelly Chapman; Fabio Boschetti; Elizabeth Fulton; Pierre Horwitz; Tod Jones; Pascal Scherrer; Geoff Syme
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Consumer Decision-Making Creativity and Its Relation to Exploitation-Exploration Activities: Eye-Tracking Approach.

Authors:  Eunyoung Choi; Cheong Kim; Kun Chang Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.