Literature DB >> 24980873

Charged particle therapy versus photon therapy for paranasal sinus and nasal cavity malignant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Samir H Patel1, Zhen Wang2, William W Wong3, Mohammad Hassan Murad2, Courtney R Buckey3, Khaled Mohammed2, Fares Alahdab2, Osama Altayar2, Mohammed Nabhan2, Steven E Schild3, Robert L Foote4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant tumours arising within the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are rare and composed of several histological types, rendering controlled clinical trials to establish the best treatment impractical. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated with charged particle therapy with those of individuals receiving photon therapy.
METHODS: We identified studies of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus tumours through searches of databases including Embase, Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Collaboration. We included treatment-naive cohorts (both primary and adjuvant radiation therapy) and those with recurrent disease. Primary outcomes of interest were overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control, at 5 years and at longest follow-up. We used random-effect models to pool outcomes across studies and compared event rates of combined outcomes for charged particle therapy and photon therapy using an interaction test.
FINDINGS: 43 cohorts from 41 non-comparative observational studies were included. Median follow-up for the charged particle therapy group was 38 months (range 5-73) and for the photon therapy group was 40 months (14-97). Pooled overall survival was significantly higher at 5 years for charged particle therapy than for photon therapy (relative risk 1·51, 95% CI 1·14-1·99; p=0·0038) and at longest follow-up (1·27, 1·01-1·59; p=0·037). At 5 years, disease-free survival was significantly higher for charged particle therapy than for photon therapy (1·93, 1·36-2·75, p=0·0003) but, at longest follow-up, this event rate did not differ between groups (1·51, 1·00-2·30; p=0·052). Locoregional control did not differ between treatment groups at 5 years (1·06, 0·68-1·67; p=0·79) but it was higher for charged particle therapy than for photon therapy at longest follow-up (1·18, 1·01-1·37; p=0·031). A subgroup analysis comparing proton beam therapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy showed significantly higher disease-free survival at 5 years (relative risk 1·44, 95% CI 1·01-2·05; p=0·045) and locoregional control at longest follow-up (1·26, 1·05-1·51; p=0·011).
INTERPRETATION: Compared with photon therapy, charged particle therapy could be associated with better outcomes for patients with malignant diseases of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Prospective studies emphasising collection of patient-reported and functional outcomes are strongly encouraged. FUNDING: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980873     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70268-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  52 in total

1.  Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Photon Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer: First Comparative Results of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Terence T Sio; Huei-Kai Lin; Qiuling Shi; G Brandon Gunn; Charles S Cleeland; J Jack Lee; Mike Hernandez; Pierre Blanchard; Nikhil G Thaker; Jack Phan; David I Rosenthal; Adam S Garden; William H Morrison; C David Fuller; Tito R Mendoza; Radhe Mohan; Xin Shelley Wang; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2015.

Authors:  David G Pfister; Sharon Spencer; David M Brizel; Barbara Burtness; Paul M Busse; Jimmy J Caudell; Anthony J Cmelak; A Dimitrios Colevas; Frank Dunphy; David W Eisele; Robert L Foote; Jill Gilbert; Maura L Gillison; Robert I Haddad; Bruce H Haughey; Wesley L Hicks; Ying J Hitchcock; Antonio Jimeno; Merrill S Kies; William M Lydiatt; Ellie Maghami; Thomas McCaffrey; Loren K Mell; Bharat B Mittal; Harlan A Pinto; John A Ridge; Cristina P Rodriguez; Sandeep Samant; Jatin P Shah; Randal S Weber; Gregory T Wolf; Frank Worden; Sue S Yom; Nicole McMillian; Miranda Hughes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Unresectable Ameloblastoma Successfully Treated with Definitive Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Francesco Dionisi; Maurizio Amichetti; Carlo Algranati; Irene Giacomelli; Mattia Barbareschi; Mauro Recla; Cesare Grandi
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2017-09-26

Review 4.  Multimodal Therapy for Sinonasal Malignancies: Updates and Review of Current Treatment.

Authors:  Mayur D Mody; Nabil F Saba
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-01-16

Review 5.  Charged-particle therapy in cancer: clinical uses and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Roberto Orecchia; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Comparison of a Hybrid IMRT/VMAT technique with non-coplanar VMAT and non-coplanar IMRT for unresectable olfactory neuroblastoma using the RayStation treatment planning system-EUD, NTCP and planning study.

Authors:  Vijay P Raturi; Atsushi Motegi; Sadamoto Zenda; Naoki Nakamura; Hidehiro Hojo; Shin-Ichiro Kageyama; Masayuki Okumura; Toshiya Rachi; Hajime Ohyoshi; Hidenobu Tachibana; Kana Motegi; Takaki Ariji; Masaki Nakamura; Yasuhiro Hirano; Hidenari Hirata; Tetsuo Akimoto
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 7.  Proton therapy - Present and future.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; David Grosshans
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Outcomes and toxicities of definitive radiotherapy and reirradiation using 3-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated (pencil beam) proton therapy for patients with nasal cavity and paranasal sinus malignancies.

Authors:  Ming Fan; Jung Julie Kang; Anna Lee; Dan Fan; Huili Wang; Sarin Kitpanit; Pamela Fox; Kevin Sine; Dennis Mah; Sean M McBride; Chiaojung Jillian Tsai; Nadeem Riaz; Lara A Dunn; Eric J Sherman; Loren Michel; Bhuvanesh Singh; Ian Ganly; Richard J Wong; Jay O Boyle; Marc A Cohen; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Complications in Salvage Surgery for Nasal and Paranasal Malignant Tumors Involving the Skull Base.

Authors:  Masanori Teshima; Hirotaka Shinomiya; Naoki Otsuki; Hidehito Kimura; Masaaki Taniguchi; Kazunobu Hashikawa; Eiji Kohmura; Ken-Ichi Nibu
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-09-14

10.  Localized sinonasal mucosal melanoma: Outcomes and associations with stage, radiotherapy, and positron emission tomography response.

Authors:  Robert M Samstein; Richard D Carvajal; Michael A Postow; Margaret K Callahan; Alexander N Shoushtari; Snehal G Patel; Nancy Y Lee; Christopher A Barker
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.