Literature DB >> 24980854

Suture versus preperitoneal polypropylene mesh for elective umbilical hernia repairs.

Rachel L Berger1, Linda T Li1, Stephanie C Hicks2, Mike K Liang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Repair of primary ventral hernias (PVH) such as umbilical hernias is a common surgical procedure. There is a paucity of risk-adjusted data comparing suture versus mesh repair of these hernias. We compared preperitoneal polypropylene (PP) repair versus suture repair for elective umbilical hernia repair.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all elective open PVH repairs at a single institution from 2000-2010 was performed. Only patients with suture or PP repair of umbilical hernias were included. Univariate analysis was conducted and propensity for treatment-adjusted multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: There were 442 elective open PVH repairs performed; 392 met our inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 126 (32.1%) had a PP repair and 266 (67.9%) underwent suture repair. Median (range) follow-up was 60 mo (1-143). Patients who underwent PP repair had more surgical site infections (SSIs; 19.8% versus 7.9%, P < 0.01) and seromas (14.3% versus 4.1%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in recurrence (5.6% versus 7.5%, P = 0.53). On propensity score-adjusted multivariate analysis, we found that body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 1.10) and smoking status (OR, 2.3) were associated with recurrence. Mesh (OR, 2.34) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (OR, 1.95) were associated with SSI. Only mesh (OR, 3.41) was associated with seroma formation.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a trend toward more recurrence with suture repair in our study, this was not statistically significant. Mesh repair was associated with more SSI and seromas. Further prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to clarify the role of suture and mesh repair in PVH.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mesh; Polypropylene; Recurrence; Seroma; Surgical site infection; Suture; Umbilical hernia; Ventral hernia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980854     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  6 in total

1.  Mesh migration following abdominal hernia repair: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  H B Cunningham; J J Weis; L R Taveras; S Huerta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Mesh Location in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julie L Holihan; Duyen H Nguyen; Mylan T Nguyen; Jiandi Mo; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in the Management of High-Grade Ventral Hernia Repairs.

Authors:  Nelson Rodriguez-Unda; Kevin C Soares; Saïd C Azoury; Pablo A Baltodano; Caitlin W Hicks; Karen K Burce; Peter Cornell; Carisa M Cooney; Frederic E Eckhauser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Use of imaging for pre- and post-operative characterisation of ventral hernia: systematic review.

Authors:  Steve Halligan; Sam G Parker; Andrew A O Plumb; Chris Pj Wood; Richard W Bolton; Susan Mallett; Alastair Cj Windsor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Mesh repair of paraumblical hernia, outcome of 58 cases.

Authors:  Deari Ahmed Ismaeil
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-13

6.  Mesh versus suture in elective repair of umbilical hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L J Madsen; E Oma; L N Jorgensen; K K Jensen
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-04-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.