Literature DB >> 24980594

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17: bone growth stimulators as an adjunct for lumbar fusion.

Michael G Kaiser1, Jason C Eck, Michael W Groff, Zoher Ghogawala, William C Watters, Andrew T Dailey, Daniel K Resnick, Tanvir F Choudhri, Alok Sharan, Jeffrey C Wang, Sanjay S Dhall, Praveen V Mummaneni.   

Abstract

The relationship between the formation of a solid arthrodesis and electrical and electromagnetic energy is well established; most of the information on the topic, however, pertains to the healing of long bone fractures. The use of both invasive and noninvasive means to supply this energy and supplement spinal fusions has been investigated. Three forms of electrical stimulation are routinely used: direct current stimulation (DCS), pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation (PEMFS), and capacitive coupled electrical stimulation (CCES). Only DCS requires the placement of electrodes within the fusion substrate and is inserted at the time of surgery. Since publication of the original guidelines, few studies have investigated the use of bone growth stimulators. Based on the current review, no conflict with the previous recommendations was generated. The use of DCS is recommended as an option for patients younger than 60 years of age, since a positive effect on fusion has been observed. The same, however, cannot be stated for patients over 60, because DCS did not appear to have an impact on fusion rates in this population. No study was reviewed that investigated the use of CCES or the routine use of PEMFS. A single low-level study demonstrated a positive impact of PEMFS on patients undergoing revision surgery for pseudarthrosis, but this single study is insufficient to recommend for or against the use of PEMFS in this patient population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMP = bone morphogenetic protein; CCES = capacitive coupled electrical stimulation; DCS = direct current stimulation; DEXA = dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; DPQ = Dallas Pain Questionnaire; LBPRS = Low Back Pain Rating Scale; PEMFS = pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation; SF-36 = 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; VAS = visual analog scale; bone growth stimulator; lumbar fusion; lumbar spine; practice guidelines

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980594     DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of bilateral versus unilateral decompression incision of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Yongzhao Zhao; Yanjie Zhu; Hailong Zhang; Chuanfeng Wang; Shisheng He; Guangfei Gu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Failure in Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Current Management Modalities.

Authors:  Alex Cruz; Alexander E Ropper; David S Xu; Michael Bohl; Edward M Reece; Sebastian J Winocour; Edward Buchanan; Geoffrey Kaung
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Topping-Off Technology versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xiangyao Sun; Tongtong Zhang; Siyuan Sun; Chao Kong; Shibao Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Trends and Costs of External Electrical Bone Stimulators and Grafting Materials in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Anthony D'Oro; Zorica Buser; Darrel Scott Brodke; Jong-Beom Park; Sangwook Tim Yoon; Jim Aimen Youssef; Hans-Joerg Meisel; Kristen Emmanuel Radcliff; Patrick Hsieh; Jeffrey Chun Wang
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-10-16

5.  Comparison between topping-off technology and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of chronic low back pain: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xiangyao Sun; Tongtong Zhang; Siyuan Sun; Chao Kong; Junzhe Ding; Xiangyu Li; Shibao Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Capacitive-resistive radiofrequency therapy to treat postpartum perineal pain: A randomized study.

Authors:  Florence Bretelle; Chantal Fabre; Marine Golka; Vanessa Pauly; Brimbelle Roth; Valérie Bechadergue; Julie Blanc
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.