Literature DB >> 24980589

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 12: pedicle screw fixation as an adjunct to posterolateral fusion.

Michael W Groff1, Andrew T Dailey, Zoher Ghogawala, Daniel K Resnick, William C Watters, Praveen V Mummaneni, Tanvir F Choudhri, Jason C Eck, Alok Sharan, Jeffrey C Wang, Sanjay S Dhall, Michael G Kaiser.   

Abstract

The utilization of pedicle screw fixation as an adjunct to posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) has become routine, but demonstration of a definitive benefit remains problematic. The medical evidence indicates that the addition of pedicle screw fixation to PLF increases fusion rates when assessed with dynamic radiographs. More recent evidence, since publication of the 2005 Lumbar Fusion Guidelines, suggests a stronger association between radiographic fusion and clinical outcome, although, even now, no clear correlation has been demonstrated. Although several reports suggest that clinical outcomes are improved with the addition of pedicle screw fixation, there are conflicting findings from similarly classified evidence. Furthermore, the largest contemporary, randomized, controlled study on this topic failed to demonstrate a significant clinical benefit with the use of pedicle screw fixation in patients undergoing PLF for chronic low-back pain. This absence of proof should not, however, be interpreted as proof of absence. Several limitations continue to compromise these investigations. For example, in the majority of studies the sample size is insufficient to detect small increments in clinical outcome that may be observed with pedicle screw fixation. Therefore, no definitive statement regarding the efficacy of pedicle screw fixation as a means to improve functional outcomes in patients undergoing PLF for chronic low-back pain can be made. There appears to be consistent evidence suggesting that pedicle screw fixation increases the costs and complication rate of PLF. High-risk patients, including (but not limited to) patients who smoke, patients who are undergoing revision surgery, or patients who suffer from medical conditions that may compromise fusion potential, may appreciate a greater benefit with supplemental pedicle screw fixation. It is recommended, therefore, that the use of pedicle screw fixation as a supplement to PLF be reserved for those patients in whom there is an increased risk of nonunion when treated with only PLF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DPQ = Dallas Pain Questionnaire; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; PLF = posterolateral lumbar fusion; SF-36 = 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; adjunct; lumbar spine; pedicle screw; posterolateral fusion; practice guidelines

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980589     DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  6 in total

1.  Deviating from the Recommended Torque on Set Screws Can Reduce the Stability and Fatigue Life of Pedicle Screw Fixation Devices.

Authors:  Lien-Chen Wu; Yueh-Ying Hsieh; Fon-Yih Tsuang; Yueh-Feng Chiang; Chang-Jung Chiang
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.948

2.  Combined transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with posterolateral instrumented fusion for degenerative disc disease can be a safe and effective treatment for lower back pain.

Authors:  Ara J Deukmedjian; Augusto J Cianciabella; Jason Cutright; Arias Deukmedjian
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

3.  Posterolateral lumbar fusion: Relationship between computed tomography Hounsfield units and symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.

Authors:  Ha Son Nguyen; Saman Shabani; Mohit Patel; Dennis Maiman
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-11-25

4.  Analysis of the correlative factors in the selection of interbody fusion cage height in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hongli Wang; Wenjie Chen; Jianyuan Jiang; Feizhou Lu; Xiaosheng Ma; Xinlei Xia
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Age, body mass index, and osteoporosis are more predictive than imaging for adjacent-segment reoperation after lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Nii-Kwanchie Ankrah; Ilyas M Eli; Subu N Magge; Robert G Whitmore; Andrew Y Yew
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-09-06

6.  Comparison of unilateral pedicle screw fixation and interbody fusion with PEEK cage vs. standalone expandable fusion cage for the treatment of unilateral lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Jinlei Zhang; Aixing Pan; Li Zhou; Jingyi Yu; Xiao Zhang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.318

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.