Literature DB >> 24980580

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: assessment of economic outcome.

Zoher Ghogawala1, Robert G Whitmore, William C Watters, Alok Sharan, Praveen V Mummaneni, Andrew T Dailey, Tanvir F Choudhri, Jason C Eck, Michael W Groff, Jeffrey C Wang, Daniel K Resnick, Sanjay S Dhall, Michael G Kaiser.   

Abstract

A comprehensive economic analysis generally involves the calculation of indirect and direct health costs from a societal perspective as opposed to simply reporting costs from a hospital or payer perspective. Hospital charges for a surgical procedure must be converted to cost data when performing a cost-effectiveness analysis. Once cost data has been calculated, quality-adjusted life year data from a surgical treatment are calculated by using a preference-based health-related quality-of-life instrument such as the EQ-5D. A recent cost-utility analysis from a single study has demonstrated the long-term (over an 8-year time period) benefits of circumferential fusions over stand-alone posterolateral fusions. In addition, economic analysis from a single study has found that lumbar fusion for selected patients with low-back pain can be recommended from an economic perspective. Recent economic analysis, from a single study, finds that femoral ring allograft might be more cost-effective compared with a specific titanium cage when performing an anterior lumbar interbody fusion plus posterolateral fusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIF = anterior lumbar inter-body fusion; CCR = cost-to-charge ratio; CMS = Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services; CPT = Current Procedural Terminology; DRG = Diagnosis-Related Group; FRA = femoral ring allograft; HR-QOL = health-related quality of life; ICBG = iliac crest bone graft; ICD = International Classification of Diseases; ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; LOS = length of hospital stay; MIS = minimally invasive surgery; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; QALY = quality-adjusted life year; SEK = Swedish kronor; SF-36 = 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; SPORT = Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial; TC = titanium cage; TDR = total lumbar disc replacement; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; UK = United Kingdom; VAS = visual analog scale; cost-effectiveness; fusion; lumbar spine; outcomes; practice guidelines; rhBMP-2 = recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein–2

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980580     DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  3 in total

1.  Factors associated with lumbar fusion surgery: a case-control study.

Authors:  Anna Ialynytchev; Alan M Sear; Arthur R Williams; Barbara Langland-Orban; Nanhua Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Fast degradable citrate-based bone scaffold promotes spinal fusion.

Authors:  Jiajun Tang; Jinshan Guo; Zhen Li; Cheng Yang; Denghui Xie; Jian Chen; Shengfa Li; Shaolin Li; Gloria B Kim; Xiaochun Bai; Zhongmin Zhang; Jian Yang
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 6.331

3.  A Proposed Personalized Spine Care Protocol (SpineScreen) to Treat Visualized Pain Generators: An Illustrative Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Reoperations between Targeted Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery, Minimally Invasive TLIF and Open Laminectomy.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Ivo Abraham; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Albert E Telfeian; Morgan P Lorio; Stefan Hellinger; Martin Knight; Paulo Sérgio Teixeira De Carvalho; Max Rogério Freitas Ramos; Álvaro Dowling; Manuel Rodriguez Garcia; Fauziyya Muhammad; Namath Hussain; Vicky Yamamoto; Babak Kateb; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.