Literature DB >> 24980579

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2: assessment of functional outcome following lumbar fusion.

Zoher Ghogawala1, Daniel K Resnick, William C Watters, Praveen V Mummaneni, Andrew T Dailey, Tanvir F Choudhri, Jason C Eck, Alok Sharan, Michael W Groff, Jeffrey C Wang, Sanjay S Dhall, Michael G Kaiser.   

Abstract

Assessment of functional patient-reported outcome following lumbar spinal fusion continues to be essential for comparing the effectiveness of different treatments for patients presenting with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. When assessing functional outcome in patients being treated with lumbar spinal fusion, a reliable, valid, and responsive outcomes instrument such as the Oswestry Disability Index should be used. The SF-36 and the SF-12 have emerged as dominant measures of general health-related quality of life. Research has established the minimum clinically important difference for major functional outcomes measures, and this should be considered when assessing clinical outcome. The results of recent studies suggest that a patient's pretreatment psychological state is a major independent variable that affects the ability to detect change in functional outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BIS = Balanced Inventory for Spinal Disorders; DRI = Disability Rating Index; HR-QOL = health-related quality of life; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; LSOQ = Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire; MCID = minimum clinically important difference; MCS = mental component summary; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PCS = physical component summary; RMDQ = Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; SF-12 = 12-Item Short Form Health Survey; SF-36 = 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; SIP = Sickness Impact Profile; SRS-22 = 22-Item Scoliosis Research Society; VAS = visual analog scale; fusion; lumbar spine; practice guidelines; treatment outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980579     DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  5 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Sara Khor; Danielle Lavallee; Amy M Cizik; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Christopher R Howe; Dawei Lu; A Alex Mohit; Rod J Oskouian; Jeffrey R Roh; Neal Shonnard; Armagan Dagal; David R Flum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Towards personalized and value-based spine care: objective patient monitoring with smartphone activity data.

Authors:  Hasan S Ahmad; Andrew I Yang; Gregory W Basil; William C Welch; Michael Y Wang; Jang W Yoon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

3.  Pain and disability after first-time spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niek Koenders; Alison Rushton; Martin L Verra; Paul C Willems; Thomas J Hoogeboom; J Bart Staal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Construct validity and responsiveness of commonly used patient reported outcome instruments in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Ian Braithwaite
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-01-13

5.  Influence of Gender on Health-Related Quality of Life and Disability at 1 Year After Surgery for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures.

Authors:  Tiberiu Maior; Gheorghe Ungureanu; Cristian Kakucs; Cristian Berce; Bobe Petrushev; Ioan-Stefan Florian
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-07-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.