Literature DB >> 24980044

Dose-volume response in acute dysphagia toxicity: Validating QUANTEC recommendations into clinical practice for head and neck radiotherapy.

Nigel J Anderson1, Morikatsu Wada, Michal Schneider-Kolsky, Maureen Rolfo, Daryl Lim Joon, Vincent Khoo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the validity of QUANTEC recommendations in predicting acute dysphagia using intensity-modulated head and neck radiotherapy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck +/- systemic therapy were analyzed. Multiple dose parameters for the larynx (V50Gy, Dmean and Dmax) were recorded. Acute dysphagia toxicity was prospectively scored in all treatment weeks (week 1-6 or 1-7) using CTCAEv3 by three blinded investigators. QUANTEC larynx recommendations (V50Gy < 27%, Dmean < 44 Gy, Dmean < 40 Gy, Dmax < 66 Gy) were used to group the cohort (i.e. V50Gy < 27% vs. V50Gy > 27%). The proportion of patients with Grade 3 dysphagia was compared within each group.
RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the incidence of grade 3 toxicity in the V50Gy < or > 27% group at week 5 (14.3% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.01) and 6 (25.9% vs. 65.9%, p < 0.01). A significant reduction at week 5 (14.7% vs. 50.0, p = 0.02) and 6 (32.4% vs. 67.6%, p = 0.01) was seen in Dmean < 44 Gy when compared to Dmean > 44 Gy. Dmean < 40 Gy also delivered a significant reduction at week 5 (5.6% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.01) and week 6 (23.5% vs. 59.3%, p = 0.01). A significant toxicity reduction at treatment week 6 (28.0% vs. 63.0%, p = 0 < 01) was seen from Dmax < 66 Gy to Dmax > 66 Gy. V50Gy > 27% (p < 0.01), Dmean > 40 Gy (p = 0.01) and Dmax > 66 Gy (p < 0.01) were also predictors of Grade 3 dysphagia when analyzed with multiple clinical risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: QUANTEC late toxicity recommendations for dose to larynx during IMRT are a useful predictor for acute dysphagia toxicity in this patient cohort. Furthermore, this included chemoradiotherapy regimes and post-operative radiotherapy patients, allowing for prophylactic implementation of supportive care measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980044     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.933874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  5 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting the dose constraints for head and neck OARs in the current era of IMRT.

Authors:  N Patrik Brodin; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 2.  Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART): Conceptual Considerations for the Informed Clinician.

Authors:  Jolien Heukelom; Clifton David Fuller
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.934

3.  Systematic Review of Normal Tissue Complication Models Relevant to Standard Fractionation Radiation Therapy of the Head and Neck Region Published After the QUANTEC Reports.

Authors:  N Patrik Brodin; Rafi Kabarriti; Madhur K Garg; Chandan Guha; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Dosimetric Evaluation of a Simple Planning Technique for Improving Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Mei Li; Bao-Tian Huang; Wen-Jia Xie; Liang-Xi Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Incorporating spatial dose metrics in machine learning-based normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models of severe acute dysphagia resulting from head and neck radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jamie Dean; Kee Wong; Hiram Gay; Liam Welsh; Ann-Britt Jones; Ulricke Schick; Jung Hun Oh; Aditya Apte; Kate Newbold; Shreerang Bhide; Kevin Harrington; Joseph Deasy; Christopher Nutting; Sarah Gulliford
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.