Literature DB >> 24979734

Inter-laboratory validation of bioaccessibility testing for metals.

Rayetta G Henderson1, Violaine Verougstraete2, Kim Anderson3, José J Arbildua4, Thomas O Brock5, Tony Brouwers6, Danielle Cappellini7, Katrien Delbeke8, Gunilla Herting9, Greg Hixon10, Inger Odnevall Wallinder11, Patricio H Rodriguez12, Frank Van Assche13, Peter Wilrich14, Adriana R Oller15.   

Abstract

Bioelution assays are fast, simple alternatives to in vivo testing. In this study, the intra- and inter-laboratory variability in bioaccessibility data generated by bioelution tests were evaluated in synthetic fluids relevant to oral, inhalation, and dermal exposure. Using one defined protocol, five laboratories measured metal release from cobalt oxide, cobalt powder, copper concentrate, Inconel alloy, leaded brass alloy, and nickel sulfate hexahydrate. Standard deviations of repeatability (sr) and reproducibility (sR) were used to evaluate the intra- and inter-laboratory variability, respectively. Examination of the sR:sr ratios demonstrated that, while gastric and lysosomal fluids had reasonably good reproducibility, other fluids did not show as good concordance between laboratories. Relative standard deviation (RSD) analysis showed more favorable reproducibility outcomes for some data sets; overall results varied more between- than within-laboratories. RSD analysis of sr showed good within-laboratory variability for all conditions except some metals in interstitial fluid. In general, these findings indicate that absolute bioaccessibility results in some biological fluids may vary between different laboratories. However, for most applications, measures of relative bioaccessibility are needed, diminishing the requirement for high inter-laboratory reproducibility in absolute metal releases. The inter-laboratory exercise suggests that the degrees of freedom within the protocol need to be addressed.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alloys; Bioaccessibility; Bioelution; Classification; Inter-laboratory validation; Metals; Read-across; UVCBs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24979734     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  4 in total

1.  Physical, chemical, and toxicological characterization of fibrillated forms of cellulose using an in vitro gastrointestinal digestion and co-culture model.

Authors:  Sahar H Pradhan; Marina R Mulenos; London R Steele; Matthew Gibb; James D Ede; Kimberly J Ong; Jo Anne Shatkin; Christie M Sayes
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Migration protocol to estimate metal exposure from mouthing copper and tin alloy objects.

Authors:  Paola Urrestarazu; Germán Villavicencio; Margaret Opazo; José Arbildua; Craig Boreiko; Katrien Delbeke; Patricio H Rodriguez
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 5.984

3.  Bioelution, Bioavailability, and Toxicity of Cobalt Compounds Correlate.

Authors:  Ruth Danzeisen; David Lee Williams; Vanessa Viegas; Michael Dourson; Steven Verberckmoes; Arne Burzlaff
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Cell-biological effects of zinc oxide spheres and rods from the nano- to the microscale at sub-toxic levels.

Authors:  M Olejnik; M Kersting; N Rosenkranz; K Loza; M Breisch; A Rostek; O Prymak; L Schürmeyer; G Westphal; M Köller; J Bünger; M Epple; C Sengstock
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.691

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.