| Literature DB >> 24979703 |
Ba Wang1, Zhihua Liu1, Quanjiao Chen2, Zhimin Gao2, Fang Fang1, Haiyan Chang1, Jianjun Chen2, Bing Xu3, Ze Chen4.
Abstract
Three H9N2 avian influenza viruses were isolated from the Dongting Lake wetland, among which one was from fresh egret feces, the other two were from chicken cloacal swabs in poultry markets. Phylogenetic analyses suggested that eight genes of the egret-derived H9N2 virus might come from Korean-like or American-like lineages. The two poultry-derived H9N2 viruses were reassortants between the CK/BJ/94-like and G1-like viruses. Except the PB1 genes (90.6%), the nucleotide sequence of other internal genes of the two viruses exhibited high homology (>95%). In addition, they also exhibited high homology (96-98.3%) with some genes of the H7N9 virus that caused an epidemic in China in 2013. Nucleotide sequence of the poultry-derived and egret-derived H9N2 viruses shared low homology. Infection studies showed that the egret-derived H9N2 virus was non-pathogenic to both mice and chickens, and the virus was unable to infect chickens even through 8 passages continuously in the lung. On the other hand, the chickens infected by poultry-derived viruses showed obvious clinical symptoms and even died; the infected mice showed no noticeable clinical symptoms and weight loss, but viruses could be detected in their lungs. In conclusion, for the egret-derived H9N2 virus, it would take a long adaptation process to achieve cross-species transmission in poultry and mammals. H9N2 viruses isolated at different times from the same host species in the same geographical region presented different evolutionary status, and virus isolated from different hosts in the same geographical region exhibited genetic diversity. Therefore, it is important to continue the H9N2 virus surveillance for understanding their evolutionary trends so as to provide guidance for disease control and prevention.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24979703 PMCID: PMC4076334 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Comparisons of three H9N2 viruses with isolates in GenBank of highest nucleotide and amino acid identity (%).
| Gene | Virus | Site | Homologous virus | Homology (%) | Site | Homologous virus | Homology(%) |
| E1 | Jan-41 | WD/Korea/SNU50-5/09(H5N1) | 98 | 1-768 | CK/Netherlands/1/03(H7N7) | 99 | |
| PB2 | C1 | Jan-41 | CK/China/AH-10-01/10(H9N2) | 98 | 1-768 | CK/Netherlands/1/03(H7N7) | 99 |
| C12 | Jan-80 | CK/HB/1102/10(H5N2) | 95 | 1-759 | CK/HB/1102/2010(H5N2) | 99 | |
| E1 | Jan-41 | WD/Korea/SNU50-5/09(H5N1) | 98 | 1-757 | DK/Hokkaido/Vac-2/04(H7N7) | 99 | |
| PB1 | C1 | Jan-41 | WD/Korea/SH5-26/08(H4N6) | 98 | 1-757 | WG/Mongolia/1-125/08(H3N8) CK/Jiangsu/Q3/10(H9N2) | 99 |
| C12 | Jan-74 | CK/HB/1102/10(H5N2) | 99 | 1-757 | 99 | ||
| E1 | Jan-08 | Nor-sv/California/2810/11(H11N2) | 99 | 1-716 | MD/Alberta/569/08(H1N1] | 99 | |
| PA | C1 | Jan-33 | CK/China/AH-10-01/10(H9N2) | 99 | 1-716 | SW/Taizhou/5/08(H9N2) | 99 |
| C12 | Jan-62 | EQ/GX/3/11(H9N2) | 98 | 1-716 | CK/Zhejiang/607/11(H9N2) | 99 | |
| E1 | 1-1717 | Nor-sv/IA/8BM/08(H9N2) | 97 | 1-560 | Nor-sv/IA/8BM/08(H9N2) | 97 | |
| HA | C1 | 1-1742 | CK/SD/C/09(H9N2) | 98 | 1-560 | CK/Anhui/B11/10(H9N2) | 99 |
| C12 | 1-1683 | CK/Anhui/WBQ/11(H9N2) | 99 | 1-560 | CK/Anhui/WBQ/11(H9N2) | 99 | |
| E1 | 1-1565 | WD/Korea/SH5-60/08(H4N6) | 98 | 1-504 | SW/Fujian/1/03(H5N1) | 99 | |
| NP | C1 | 1-1594 | CK/China/AH-10-01/10(H9N2) | 99 | 1-498 | CK/HB/4/08(H9N2) | 99 |
| C12 | 1-1594 | CK/China/AH-10-01/10(H9N2) | 99 | 1-498 | CK/HB/4/08(H9N2) | 99 | |
| E1 | 1-1441 | SG/Montana/466771-4/06(H5N2) | 98 | 1-469 | SG/MTN/466771-4/06(H5N2) | 99 | |
| NA | C1 | 1-1432 | CK/China/AH-10-01/10(H9N2) | 98 | 1-466 | CK/Tongshan/1/11(H9N2) | 99 |
| C12 | 1-1432 | CK/China/AH-10-01/10(H9N2) | 98 | 1-466 | CK/Shandong/B2/07(H9N2) | 97 | |
| E1 | 1-1027 | WD/Korea/CSM4-28/10(H4N6) | 99 | 1-252 | WD/Korea/CSM4-28/10(H4N6) | 99 | |
| M | C1 | 1-1043 | CK/China/AH-10-01/10(H9N2) | 99 | 1-252 | CK/China/AH-10-01/10(H9N2) | 99 |
| C12 | 1-1043 | CK/China/AH-10-01/10(H9N2) | 99 | 1-252 | CK/China/AH-10-01/20(H9N2) | 99 | |
| E1 | 1-889 | SF/MST/W07-2241/07(H3N8) | 99 | 1-217 | SF/MST/W07-2241/07(H3N8) | 99 | |
| NS | C1 | 1-883 | CK/SD/03/10(H9N2) | 99 | 1-217 | CK/SD/03/10(H9N2) | 99 |
| C12 | 1-919 | CK/China/AH-10-01/10(H9N2) | 98 | 1-217 | CK/China/AH-10-01/10(H9N2) | 97 |
Nor-sv, northern shoveler; EQ equine; SG snow goose; SF, surfacewater; SW, swine; MD, mallard; WG, whitegoose; HB, Hubei; GX, Guangxi; SD, Shandong;
MST, Minnesota; MTN, Montana.
*E1: A/Egret/Hunan/1/2012. C1: A/Chicken/Hunan/1/2012. C12: A/Chicken/Hunan/12/2011.
Nucleotide sequence isolate with the highest homology.
Amino acid sequence isolate with the highest homology.
Homology (%) of nucleotide sequences of eight genes of virus from chickens and relevant sequences of birds or H7N9.
| Virus | Percent identity of nucleotide (%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| HA | NA | PB2 | PB1 | PA | NP | M | NS | |||||||||||||||||
| E1 | BJ16 | S69 | E1 | BJ16 | S69 | E1 | BJ16 | S69 | E1 | BJ16 | S69 | E1 | BJ16 | S69 | E1 | BJ16 | S69 | E1 | BJ16 | S69 | E1 | BJ16 | S69 | |
| C1 | 83.8 | 97.4 | - | 84.5 | 95.2 | - | 87.8 | 96.0 | 95.5 | 96.8 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 90.2 | 96.5 | 96.4 | 90.7 | 95.8 | 95.8 | 90.6 | 99.0 | 98.3 | 69.7 | 95.2 | 95.8 |
| C12 | 83.7 | 97.4 | - | 84.6 | 95.2 | - | 86.2 | 96.9 | 96.5 | 90.3 | 97.1 | 98.5 | 89.9 | 96.8 | 96.6 | 90.9 | 96.1 | 95.9 | 90.4 | 98.7 | 98.0 | 70.7 | 99.0 | 97.6 |
E1: A/Egret/Hunan/1/2012; C1: A/Chicken/Hunan/1/2012; C12: A/Chicken/Hunan/12/2011;
BJ16:A/Brambling/Beijing/16/2012(H9N2); S69: A/Pigeon/Shanghai/S1069/2013(H7N9).
The identity was not done.
Figure 1Phylogenetic trees for the HA, NA, PB2, PB1, PA, M, NS, NP genes of the H9N2 influenza A virus isolated in present study.
Trees were generated by using Maximum Likelihood analysis with 1000 bootstrap replicates in the MEGA program (version 5.2).
Gene constellation of H9N2 viruses isolated in this study.
| Virus | Lineage of gene segments | |||||||
| HA | NA | PB2 | PB1 | PA | NP | M | NS | |
| C1 | Ck/Bei | Ck/Bei | Dk1 | Korean-like | Ck/Bei | Ck/Bei | G1-like | Ck/Bei |
| C12 | Ck/Bei | Ck/Bei | Dk1 | Ck/Bei | Ck/Bei | Ck/Bei | G1-like | Ck/Bei |
| E1 | Korean-like | Korean-like | Korean-like | Korean-like | American-like | Korean-like | Korean-like | American-like |
E1: A/Egret/Hunan/1/2012 C1: A/Chicken/Hunan/1/2012 C12: A/Chicken/Hunan/12/2011.
Ck/Bei: A/Chicken/Beijing/1/94; G1-like: Quail/Hong Kong/G1/97; Dk1: Dk/ST/7488/04.
Molecular characterizations of HA, NA, PB2, PB1, PA, NP, M and NS at representative sites.
| Virus | HA | NA | PB2 | PB1-F2 | PA | M2 | NS1 | |||||||||
| Connecting peptide | RBS | Stalk deletion (63-65) | 627 | 701 | 66 | 356 | 372 | 26 | 27 | 30 | 31 | 34 | 37 | 41 | 92 | |
|
| ASDR↓G | LSG | - | E | D | N | K | E | L | V | A | S | G | H | W | D |
|
| RSSR↓G | LSG | + | E | D | N | K | E | L | V | A | N | G | H | W | D |
|
| RSSR↓G | LSG | + | E | D | S | K | E | L | V | A | N | G | H | W | D |
E1: A/Egret/Hunan/1/2012; C1: A/Chicken/Hunan/1/2012; C12: A/Chicken/Hunan/12/2011.
-: There was no deletion. +: There was deletion.
Pathogenicity and replication of the H9N2 viruses in chickens.
| Vrius | Infection route | Days post- infection | Oropharyngeal | Cloacal | No.of survivors/no. tested | ||
| No. of shedding virus/no.tested | Virus titer | No.of shedding virus/no.tested | Virus titer | ||||
|
| Intravenous | 1 | 6/8 | 1.3±0.0 | 3/8 | 1.0±0.6 | 8/8 |
| 3 | 8/8 | 1.7±0.7 | 5/8 | 1.4±0.7 | |||
| 5 | 8/8 | 1.3±0.6 | 1/8 | 1.0±0.0 | |||
| 7 | 5/8 | 1.0±0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Intranasal | 1 | 7/8 | 1.4±0.7 | 3/8 | 1.0±0.0 | 7/8 | |
| 3 | 7/8 | 3.1±0.2 | 8/8 | 2.2±0.2 | |||
| 5 | 7/8 | 2.8±0.4 | 6/8 | 1.7±0.6 | |||
| 7 | 5/7 | 1.8±0.4 | 0 | 0 | |||
|
| Intravenous | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8/8 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Intranasal | 1 | 1/8 | 1.0±0 | 1/8 | 1.0±0 | 8/8 | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
One group of eight six-week-old specific-pathogen-free white leghorn chickens were inoculated intravenously with 0.2 ml of 1∶10-diluted virus stock and observed for 14 days after infection.
E1: A/Egret/Hunan/1/2012 C12: A/Chicken/Hunan/12/2011.
Virus Titer: log10 EID50/ml, mean ±SD.
Significant difference (p<0.05).
Figure 2Bodyweight changes after challenge with the viruses.
BALB/c mice were intranasally inoculated with A/Egret/Hunan/1/2012, A/Chicken/Hunan/12/2011 viruses at 1×106.5 EID50. The bodyweights of 10 mice in each group were measured daily from the date of challenge to 21 days after challenge. Values represent mean ± SD of each group of mice.
Replication of the H9N2 viruses in mice.
| Virus | Days post- infection | Virus titer [log10(EID50/ml±SD)] | |||
| Brain | Lung | Spleen | Kidney | ||
| C12 | 3 | - | 2.2±0.9 | - | - |
| 5 | - | 2.8±0.4 | - | - | |
| 7 | - | - | - | - | |
| E1 | 3 | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | - | - | - | - | |
| 7 | - | - | - | - | |
Six-week-old BALB/c mice were infected intranasally with 106.5 EID50 of the viruses. Organs were collected on 3, 5, 7d after infection, and were titrated for virus infectivity in 10-day-old SPF embryonated chicken eggs.
E1: A/Egret/Hunan/1/2012 C12: A/Chicken/Hunan/12/2011.
Virus was not detected in these samples.
Significant difference (p<0.05).
Antigenic analysis of H9N2 influenza viruses.
| Virus | HI titers with post-infection antisera | |||
| Intravenous | Intranasal | |||
| E1 | C12 | E1 | C12 | |
| C12 | - | 5120 | - | 2560 |
| C1 | - | 2560 | - | 1280 |
| E1 | 16 | 20 | - | 40 |
E1: A/Egret/Hunan/1/2012 C1: A/Chicken/Hunan/1/2012 C12: A/Chicken/Hunan/12/2011.
The HI assay was started at a 1∶10 dilution.
Antisera were first diluted tenfold. HI titers represent the reciprocal of the dilution that resulted in complete inhibition of agglutination of 1.0% chicken RBCs. HI>16 was positive.
-HI titers were not detected.