Literature DB >> 24979616

Predictors of malignancy in patients with suspicious or indeterminate cytology on pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: a multivariate model.

Dennis Yang1, Koorosh MoezArdalan, Dennis P Collins, Shailendra S Chauhan, Peter V Draganov, Chris E Forsmark, Mihir S Wagh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate predictors of malignancy in pancreatic lesions with suspicious or indeterminate endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology.
METHODS: Suspicious/indeterminate EUS-FNA cytology was identified from our database. Stable imaging, benign pathology, or survival for 12 months after EUS-FNA was considered benign. Diagnosis of malignancy was based on positive pathology, local invasion/metastasis on imaging, or death within 12 months from cancer-associated causes. Univariate analysis was performed to compare variables between benign and malignant lesions. Multivariate analysis (covariates: age [<70 or ≥70], appearance [solid/cystic], size [<20 or ≥20 mm], and serum CA19-9 [<40 or ≥40]) was performed using binary logistic regression.
RESULTS: There were 81 patients with suspicious or indeterminate cytology. Final diagnosis was cancer in 55 (67.9%) of 81 (adenocarcinoma in 40/81 [49.4%], "other neoplasms" in 15/81 [18.5%]) and benign in 26 (32.1%) of 81. Univariate analysis revealed a difference in age, lesion size, solid/cystic characteristics, and serum CA 19-9 between benign and malignant lesions. Only elevated serum CA 19-9 was independently associated with a diagnosis of malignancy on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Age, lesion size, and solid/cystic characteristics on EUS were not independently associated with cancer. Pancreatic lesions with suspicious/indeterminate cytology and elevated serum CA 19-9 should be considered as concerning for a malignant diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24979616     DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreas        ISSN: 0885-3177            Impact factor:   3.327


  6 in total

Review 1.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

2.  Implication of suspicious cytology in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jiaqi Shi; Madelyn Lew; Mark M Zalupski; Michael H Roh; Richard S Kwon; Judy C Pang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2015-03

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasonography guided-fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of solid pancreaticobiliary lesions: Clinical aspects to improve the diagnosis.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Toru Matsui; Yohei Yabuuchi; Kenichiro Imai; Masaki Tanaka; Naomi Kakushima; Keiko Sasaki; Hiroyuki Ono
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of carcinoma pancreas.

Authors:  Rajesh Puri; Manish Manrai; Ragesh Babu Thandassery; Abdulrahman A Alfadda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-25

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapies in pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Dennis Yang; Christopher J DiMaio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Development and validation of a clinical prediction model to estimate the probability of malignancy in solid pancreatic lesions and explore its value in the atypical diagnostic category after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA).

Authors:  Ning Wei; Rui Hua Shi; Ting Yu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.