Literature DB >> 24978708

Pretreatment retroperitoneal para-aortic lymph node staging in advanced cervical cancer: a review.

Roos Marthe Smits1, Petra L M Zusterzeel, Ruud L M Bekkers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety and impact of pretreatment surgical para-aortic lymph node staging (PALNS) in advanced cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2-IVA) and to evaluate the preoperative imaging of PALNs.
METHODS: We searched in PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify data investigating the role of surgical PALNS. Selection criteria included English-language and advanced-stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2-IVA) articles.
RESULTS: Twenty-two articles were included. Para-aortic lymph node metastases were present in 18% (range, 8%-42%) of all patients with cervical cancer stage IB to IVA. The proportions of positive para-aortic nodes on histological analysis with suspicious para-aortic nodes on imaging (positive predictive value) were 20% to 66%, 0% to 27%, 86% to 100%, and 50% to 75% for computed tomographic (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, positron emission tomography (PET), and PET-CT, respectively. The negative predictive values of the imaging techniques were 53% to 92% for CT scan, 75% to 91% for MRI, 87% to 94% for PET, and 83% to 92% for PET-CT. The proportions of histologically proven PALN metastasis with normal findings on imaging were 9% to 35% for CT scan and MRI, 4% to 11% for PET, and 6% to 15% for PET-CT. The mean complication rate of PALNS is 9%, with a range of 4% to 24%, with lymphocysts being the most common complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment surgical PALN dissection or sampling is feasible, with low complication rates and short delay in starting treatment. Pretreatment PET or PET-CT is the most accurate imaging method in detecting PALN metastases but has limitations detecting microscopic tumor volumes. Even with normal findings on PET-CT, PALN metastases are present in 4% to 15% of patients. Positive PALNs in stage IB2 to IVA cervical cancer will lead to modification of treatment and may lead to better overall and disease-free survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24978708     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  14 in total

Review 1.  [The 2019 FIGO classification for cervical carcinoma-what's new?]

Authors:  L-C Horn; C E Brambs; S Opitz; U A Ulrich; A K Höhn
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Radical hysterectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy for patients with stage IB2, IIA2, and IIB cervical cancer: outcomes for a series of 308 patients.

Authors:  Tetsushi Tsuruga; Asaha Fujimoto; Kei Kawana; Mayuyo Mori; Yoko Hasumi; Nao Kino; Kensuke Tomio; Shiho Miura; Michihiro Tanikawa; Kenbun Sone; Yuichiro Miyamoto; Yuji Ikeda; Satoko Kojima; Katsuyuki Adachi; Kazunori Nagasaka; Yoko Matsumoto; Takahide Arimoto; Katsutoshi Oda; Shunsuke Nakagawa; Koji Horie; Toshiharu Yasugi; Harushige Yokota; Yutaka Osuga; Tomoyuki Fujii
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Surgical Staging of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Current Status and Research Progress.

Authors:  He Zhang; Weimin Kong; Shuning Chen; Xiaoling Zhao; Dan Luo; Yunkai Xie
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Image-guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer: Experience in the Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra.

Authors:  Elena Villafranca; Paola Navarrete; Amaya Sola; Juan Carlos Muruzabal; Sara Aguirre; Santiago Ostiz; Carmen Sanchez; Rosa Guarch; Nuria Lainez; Marta Barrado
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-10-19

5.  Use of Specific Duodenal Dose Constraints During Treatment Planning Reduces Toxicity After Definitive Paraaortic Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  David S Lakomy; Juliana Wu; Bhavana V Chapman; Zhiqian Henry Yu; Belinda Lee; Ann H Klopp; Anuja Jhingran; Patricia J Eifel; Lilie L Lin
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-12-25

Review 6.  Advances in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic cervical cancer.

Authors:  Haoran Li; Xiaohua Wu; Xi Cheng
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Therapeutic value of surgical paraaortic staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a multicenter cohort analysis from the FRANCOGYN study group.

Authors:  Yohann Dabi; Vanille Simon; Xavier Carcopino; Sofiane Bendifallah; Lobna Ouldamer; Vincent Lavoue; Geoffroy Canlorbe; Emilie Raimond; Charles Coutant; Olivier Graesslin; Pierre Collinet; Alexandre Bricou; Emile Daraï; Cyrille Huchon; Marcos Ballester; Bassam Haddad; Cyril Touboul
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Evaluation of the efficacy of prophylactic extended field irradiation in the concomitant chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, stage IIIB in the 2018 FIGO classification.

Authors:  Qingyu Meng; Xiaoliang Liu; Weiping Wang; Xiaorong Hou; Xin Lian; Shuai Sun; Junfang Yan; Zhikai Liu; Zheng Miao; Ke Hu; Fuquan Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Surgical or imaging lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ritchie Delara; Jie Yang; Skye Buckner-Petty; Paul Magtibay; Kristina Butler
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Extended-field radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Komsan Thamronganantasakul; Narudom Supakalin; Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Porjai Pattanittum; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.